Cargando…

(18)F-Fluoride and (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: Case–Control Study

BACKGROUND—: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) can assess both anatomy and biology of carotid atherosclerosis. We sought to assess whether (18)F-fluoride or (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose can identify culprit and high-risk carotid plaque. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vesey, Alex T., Jenkins, William S. A., Irkle, Agnese, Moss, Alastair, Sng, Greg, Forsythe, Rachael O., Clark, Tim, Roberts, Gemma, Fletcher, Alison, Lucatelli, Christophe, Rudd, James H. F., Davenport, Anthony P., Mills, Nicholas L., Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam, Dennis, Martin, Whiteley, William N., van Beek, Edwin J. R., Dweck, Marc R., Newby, David E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004976
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND—: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) can assess both anatomy and biology of carotid atherosclerosis. We sought to assess whether (18)F-fluoride or (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose can identify culprit and high-risk carotid plaque. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We performed (18)F-fluoride and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in 26 patients after recent transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: 18 patients with culprit carotid stenosis awaiting carotid endarterectomy and 8 controls without culprit carotid atheroma. We compared standardized uptake values in the clinically adjudicated culprit to the contralateral asymptomatic artery, and assessed the relationship between radiotracer uptake and plaque phenotype or predicted cardiovascular risk (ASSIGN score [Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Using SIGN Guidelines to Assign Preventive Treatment]). We also performed micro PET/CT and histological analysis of excised plaque. On histological and micro PET/CT analysis, (18)F-fluoride selectively highlighted microcalcification. Carotid (18)F-fluoride uptake was increased in clinically adjudicated culprit plaques compared with asymptomatic contralateral plaques (log(10)standardized uptake value(mean) 0.29±0.10 versus 0.23±0.11, P=0.001) and compared with control patients (log(10)standardized uptake value(mean) 0.29±0.10 versus 0.12±0.11, P=0.001). (18)F-Fluoride uptake correlated with high-risk plaque features (remodeling index [r=0.53, P=0.003], plaque burden [r=0.51, P=0.004]), and predicted cardiovascular risk [r=0.65, P=0.002]). Carotid (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake appeared to be increased in 7 of 16 culprit plaques, but no overall differences in uptake were observed in culprit versus contralateral plaques or control patients. However, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose did correlate with predicted cardiovascular risk (r=0.53, P=0.019), but not with plaque phenotype. CONCLUSIONS—: (18)F-Fluoride PET/CT highlights culprit and phenotypically high-risk carotid plaque. This has the potential to improve risk stratification and selection of patients who may benefit from intervention.