Cargando…

Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review

Distal biceps tendon (DBT) conditions comprise a spectrum of disorders including bicipitoradial bursitis, partial tears, acute and chronic complete tears. In low-demand patients with complete DBT tears, non-operative treatment may be entertained provided the patient understands the potential for res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alentorn-Geli, Eduard, Assenmacher, Andrew T., Sánchez-Sotelo, Joaquín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053
_version_ 1782517788309454848
author Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Assenmacher, Andrew T.
Sánchez-Sotelo, Joaquín
author_facet Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Assenmacher, Andrew T.
Sánchez-Sotelo, Joaquín
author_sort Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
collection PubMed
description Distal biceps tendon (DBT) conditions comprise a spectrum of disorders including bicipitoradial bursitis, partial tears, acute and chronic complete tears. In low-demand patients with complete DBT tears, non-operative treatment may be entertained provided the patient understands the potential for residual weakness, particularly in forearm supination. Most acute tears are best treated by primary repair using either single-incision or double-incision techniques with good clinical outcomes. Single-incision techniques may carry a higher risk of nerve-related complications, whereas double-incision techniques have historically been considered to carry a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, particularly if the ulna is exposed. Various fixation techniques, including bone tunnels, cortical buttons, suture anchors, interference screws or a combination seem to provide different fixation strength but similar clinical outcomes. Some chronic tears may be repaired primarily, provided tendon tissue can be identified; alternatively, autograft or allograft reconstruction can be considered, and good outcomes have been reported with both techniques. Cite this article: Alentorn-Geli E, Assenmacher AT, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Distal biceps tendon injuries: a clinically relevant current concepts review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:316-324. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5367534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53675342017-05-01 Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review Alentorn-Geli, Eduard Assenmacher, Andrew T. Sánchez-Sotelo, Joaquín EFORT Open Rev Shoulder & Elbow Distal biceps tendon (DBT) conditions comprise a spectrum of disorders including bicipitoradial bursitis, partial tears, acute and chronic complete tears. In low-demand patients with complete DBT tears, non-operative treatment may be entertained provided the patient understands the potential for residual weakness, particularly in forearm supination. Most acute tears are best treated by primary repair using either single-incision or double-incision techniques with good clinical outcomes. Single-incision techniques may carry a higher risk of nerve-related complications, whereas double-incision techniques have historically been considered to carry a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, particularly if the ulna is exposed. Various fixation techniques, including bone tunnels, cortical buttons, suture anchors, interference screws or a combination seem to provide different fixation strength but similar clinical outcomes. Some chronic tears may be repaired primarily, provided tendon tissue can be identified; alternatively, autograft or allograft reconstruction can be considered, and good outcomes have been reported with both techniques. Cite this article: Alentorn-Geli E, Assenmacher AT, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Distal biceps tendon injuries: a clinically relevant current concepts review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:316-324. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2016-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5367534/ /pubmed/28461963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053 Text en © 2016 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Assenmacher, Andrew T.
Sánchez-Sotelo, Joaquín
Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title_full Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title_fullStr Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title_full_unstemmed Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title_short Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review
title_sort distal biceps tendon injuries: a clinically relevant current concepts review
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053
work_keys_str_mv AT alentorngelieduard distalbicepstendoninjuriesaclinicallyrelevantcurrentconceptsreview
AT assenmacherandrewt distalbicepstendoninjuriesaclinicallyrelevantcurrentconceptsreview
AT sanchezsotelojoaquin distalbicepstendoninjuriesaclinicallyrelevantcurrentconceptsreview