Cargando…
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is impo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410161 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/cancer.3905 |
_version_ | 1782517809338646528 |
---|---|
author | Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H |
author_facet | Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H |
author_sort | Kilsdonk, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). METHODS: A total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone. Results: Overall, 58.1% (436/750) of the CCSs participated in the survey. Participation rates were equal in all 3 study arms with 57.4% (143/249) in arm 1, 60.6% (152/251) in arm 2, and 56.4% (141/250) in arm 3 (P=.09). Participation rates of CCSs who received an initial invitation for the Web-based questionnaire only and CCSs who received an invitation to complete either a paper-based or Web-based questionnaire did not differ (P=.55). After the first postal reminder, participation rates of CCSs invited for the Web-based questionnaire only also did not differ compared with CCSs invited for both the Web-based and paper-based questionnaires (P=.48). In general, CCSs preferred the paper-based over the Web-based questionnaire, and those completing the paper-based questionnaire were more often unemployed (P=.004) and lower educated (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Invitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5367669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53676692017-04-14 Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H JMIR Cancer Original Paper BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). METHODS: A total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone. Results: Overall, 58.1% (436/750) of the CCSs participated in the survey. Participation rates were equal in all 3 study arms with 57.4% (143/249) in arm 1, 60.6% (152/251) in arm 2, and 56.4% (141/250) in arm 3 (P=.09). Participation rates of CCSs who received an initial invitation for the Web-based questionnaire only and CCSs who received an invitation to complete either a paper-based or Web-based questionnaire did not differ (P=.55). After the first postal reminder, participation rates of CCSs invited for the Web-based questionnaire only also did not differ compared with CCSs invited for both the Web-based and paper-based questionnaires (P=.48). In general, CCSs preferred the paper-based over the Web-based questionnaire, and those completing the paper-based questionnaire were more often unemployed (P=.004) and lower educated (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Invitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX) JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5367669/ /pubmed/28410161 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/cancer.3905 Text en ©Ellen Kilsdonk, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Helena J van der Pal, Nynke Hollema, Leontien C Kremer, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Flora E van Leeuwen, Monique W Jaspers, Marleen H van den Berg. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (http://cancer.jmir.org), 24.11.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cancer, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://cancer.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effect of web-based versus paper-based questionnaires and follow-up strategies on participation rates of dutch childhood cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410161 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/cancer.3905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilsdonkellen effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandulmendenbroedereline effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderpalhelenaj effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hollemanynke effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kremerleontienc effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenheuveleibrinkmarrym effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanleeuwenflorae effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jaspersmoniquew effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenbergmarleenh effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |