Cargando…

Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND: Besides ‘definitive rejection’, the Banff classification includes categories for ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and phenotypes of rejection episodes in 316 consecutive renal transplants from 2009 to 2014 grouped into patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehmeier, Caroline, Amico, Patrizia, Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia, Georgalis, Argyrios, Höenger, Gideon, Menter, Thomas, Mihatsch, Michael, Burkhalter, Felix, Steiger, Juerg, Dickenmann, Michael, Hopfer, Helmut, Schaub, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000650
_version_ 1782517825509785600
author Wehmeier, Caroline
Amico, Patrizia
Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia
Georgalis, Argyrios
Höenger, Gideon
Menter, Thomas
Mihatsch, Michael
Burkhalter, Felix
Steiger, Juerg
Dickenmann, Michael
Hopfer, Helmut
Schaub, Stefan
author_facet Wehmeier, Caroline
Amico, Patrizia
Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia
Georgalis, Argyrios
Höenger, Gideon
Menter, Thomas
Mihatsch, Michael
Burkhalter, Felix
Steiger, Juerg
Dickenmann, Michael
Hopfer, Helmut
Schaub, Stefan
author_sort Wehmeier, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Besides ‘definitive rejection’, the Banff classification includes categories for ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and phenotypes of rejection episodes in 316 consecutive renal transplants from 2009 to 2014 grouped into patients without/with pretransplant HLA-DSA (ptDSA(neg), n = 251; ptDSA(pos), n = 65). METHODS: All adequate indication (n = 125) and surveillance biopsies (n = 538) performed within the first year posttransplant were classified according to the current Banff criteria. RESULTS: ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were 3 times more common than ‘definitive rejection’ phenotypes in biopsies from ptDSA(neg) patients (35% vs 11%) and equally common in biopsies from ptDSA(pos) patients (25% vs 27%). In both groups, ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were more frequent in surveillance than in indication biopsies (28% vs 16% in ptDSA(neg) patients, and 37% vs 29% in ptDSA(pos) patients). ‘Borderline changes: ‘Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection’ (91%) were the dominant ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotype in ptDSA(neg) patients, whereas ‘borderline changes’ (58%) and ‘suspicious for acute/active antibody-mediated rejection’ (42%) were equally frequent in biopsies from ptDSA(pos) patients. Inclusion of ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes increased the 1-year incidence of clinical (ptDSA(neg) patients: 18% vs 8%, P = 0.0005; ptDSA(pos) patients: 24% vs 18%, P = 0.31) and (sub)clinical rejection (ptDSA(neg) patients: 59% vs 22%, P < 0.0001; ptDSA(pos) patients: 68% vs 40%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes are very common in the current era and outnumber the frequency of ‘definitive rejection’ within the first year posttransplant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5367753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53677532017-03-30 Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis Wehmeier, Caroline Amico, Patrizia Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia Georgalis, Argyrios Höenger, Gideon Menter, Thomas Mihatsch, Michael Burkhalter, Felix Steiger, Juerg Dickenmann, Michael Hopfer, Helmut Schaub, Stefan Transplant Direct Kidney Transplantation BACKGROUND: Besides ‘definitive rejection’, the Banff classification includes categories for ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and phenotypes of rejection episodes in 316 consecutive renal transplants from 2009 to 2014 grouped into patients without/with pretransplant HLA-DSA (ptDSA(neg), n = 251; ptDSA(pos), n = 65). METHODS: All adequate indication (n = 125) and surveillance biopsies (n = 538) performed within the first year posttransplant were classified according to the current Banff criteria. RESULTS: ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were 3 times more common than ‘definitive rejection’ phenotypes in biopsies from ptDSA(neg) patients (35% vs 11%) and equally common in biopsies from ptDSA(pos) patients (25% vs 27%). In both groups, ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were more frequent in surveillance than in indication biopsies (28% vs 16% in ptDSA(neg) patients, and 37% vs 29% in ptDSA(pos) patients). ‘Borderline changes: ‘Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection’ (91%) were the dominant ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotype in ptDSA(neg) patients, whereas ‘borderline changes’ (58%) and ‘suspicious for acute/active antibody-mediated rejection’ (42%) were equally frequent in biopsies from ptDSA(pos) patients. Inclusion of ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes increased the 1-year incidence of clinical (ptDSA(neg) patients: 18% vs 8%, P = 0.0005; ptDSA(pos) patients: 24% vs 18%, P = 0.31) and (sub)clinical rejection (ptDSA(neg) patients: 59% vs 22%, P < 0.0001; ptDSA(pos) patients: 68% vs 40%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes are very common in the current era and outnumber the frequency of ‘definitive rejection’ within the first year posttransplant. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5367753/ /pubmed/28361120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000650 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Kidney Transplantation
Wehmeier, Caroline
Amico, Patrizia
Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia
Georgalis, Argyrios
Höenger, Gideon
Menter, Thomas
Mihatsch, Michael
Burkhalter, Felix
Steiger, Juerg
Dickenmann, Michael
Hopfer, Helmut
Schaub, Stefan
Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title_full Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title_fullStr Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title_short Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis
title_sort acute rejection phenotypes in the current era of immunosuppression: a single-center analysis
topic Kidney Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000650
work_keys_str_mv AT wehmeiercaroline acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT amicopatrizia acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT hirtminkowskipatricia acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT georgalisargyrios acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT hoengergideon acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT menterthomas acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT mihatschmichael acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT burkhalterfelix acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT steigerjuerg acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT dickenmannmichael acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT hopferhelmut acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis
AT schaubstefan acuterejectionphenotypesinthecurrenteraofimmunosuppressionasinglecenteranalysis