Cargando…

Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods

BACKGROUND: The fourth round of the Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI) Contest (www.casmi-contest.org) was held in 2016, with two new categories for automated methods. This article covers the 208 challenges in Categories 2 and 3, without and with metadata, from organization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schymanski, Emma L., Ruttkies, Christoph, Krauss, Martin, Brouard, Céline, Kind, Tobias, Dührkop, Kai, Allen, Felicity, Vaniya, Arpana, Verdegem, Dries, Böcker, Sebastian, Rousu, Juho, Shen, Huibin, Tsugawa, Hiroshi, Sajed, Tanvir, Fiehn, Oliver, Ghesquière, Bart, Neumann, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29086042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0207-1
_version_ 1782517860055121920
author Schymanski, Emma L.
Ruttkies, Christoph
Krauss, Martin
Brouard, Céline
Kind, Tobias
Dührkop, Kai
Allen, Felicity
Vaniya, Arpana
Verdegem, Dries
Böcker, Sebastian
Rousu, Juho
Shen, Huibin
Tsugawa, Hiroshi
Sajed, Tanvir
Fiehn, Oliver
Ghesquière, Bart
Neumann, Steffen
author_facet Schymanski, Emma L.
Ruttkies, Christoph
Krauss, Martin
Brouard, Céline
Kind, Tobias
Dührkop, Kai
Allen, Felicity
Vaniya, Arpana
Verdegem, Dries
Böcker, Sebastian
Rousu, Juho
Shen, Huibin
Tsugawa, Hiroshi
Sajed, Tanvir
Fiehn, Oliver
Ghesquière, Bart
Neumann, Steffen
author_sort Schymanski, Emma L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The fourth round of the Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI) Contest (www.casmi-contest.org) was held in 2016, with two new categories for automated methods. This article covers the 208 challenges in Categories 2 and 3, without and with metadata, from organization, participation, results and post-contest evaluation of CASMI 2016 through to perspectives for future contests and small molecule annotation/identification. RESULTS: The Input Output Kernel Regression (CSI:IOKR) machine learning approach performed best in “Category 2: Best Automatic Structural Identification—In Silico Fragmentation Only”, won by Team Brouard with 41% challenge wins. The winner of “Category 3: Best Automatic Structural Identification—Full Information” was Team Kind (MS-FINDER), with 76% challenge wins. The best methods were able to achieve over 30% Top 1 ranks in Category 2, with all methods ranking the correct candidate in the Top 10 in around 50% of challenges. This success rate rose to 70% Top 1 ranks in Category 3, with candidates in the Top 10 in over 80% of the challenges. The machine learning and chemistry-based approaches are shown to perform in complementary ways. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in (semi-)automated fragmentation methods for small molecule identification has been substantial. The achieved high rates of correct candidates in the Top 1 and Top 10, despite large candidate numbers, open up great possibilities for high-throughput annotation of untargeted analysis for “known unknowns”. As more high quality training data becomes available, the improvements in machine learning methods will likely continue, but the alternative approaches still provide valuable complementary information. Improved integration of experimental context will also improve identification success further for “real life” annotations. The true “unknown unknowns” remain to be evaluated in future CASMI contests. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0207-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5368104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53681042017-04-12 Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods Schymanski, Emma L. Ruttkies, Christoph Krauss, Martin Brouard, Céline Kind, Tobias Dührkop, Kai Allen, Felicity Vaniya, Arpana Verdegem, Dries Böcker, Sebastian Rousu, Juho Shen, Huibin Tsugawa, Hiroshi Sajed, Tanvir Fiehn, Oliver Ghesquière, Bart Neumann, Steffen J Cheminform Research Article BACKGROUND: The fourth round of the Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI) Contest (www.casmi-contest.org) was held in 2016, with two new categories for automated methods. This article covers the 208 challenges in Categories 2 and 3, without and with metadata, from organization, participation, results and post-contest evaluation of CASMI 2016 through to perspectives for future contests and small molecule annotation/identification. RESULTS: The Input Output Kernel Regression (CSI:IOKR) machine learning approach performed best in “Category 2: Best Automatic Structural Identification—In Silico Fragmentation Only”, won by Team Brouard with 41% challenge wins. The winner of “Category 3: Best Automatic Structural Identification—Full Information” was Team Kind (MS-FINDER), with 76% challenge wins. The best methods were able to achieve over 30% Top 1 ranks in Category 2, with all methods ranking the correct candidate in the Top 10 in around 50% of challenges. This success rate rose to 70% Top 1 ranks in Category 3, with candidates in the Top 10 in over 80% of the challenges. The machine learning and chemistry-based approaches are shown to perform in complementary ways. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in (semi-)automated fragmentation methods for small molecule identification has been substantial. The achieved high rates of correct candidates in the Top 1 and Top 10, despite large candidate numbers, open up great possibilities for high-throughput annotation of untargeted analysis for “known unknowns”. As more high quality training data becomes available, the improvements in machine learning methods will likely continue, but the alternative approaches still provide valuable complementary information. Improved integration of experimental context will also improve identification success further for “real life” annotations. The true “unknown unknowns” remain to be evaluated in future CASMI contests. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0207-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5368104/ /pubmed/29086042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0207-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schymanski, Emma L.
Ruttkies, Christoph
Krauss, Martin
Brouard, Céline
Kind, Tobias
Dührkop, Kai
Allen, Felicity
Vaniya, Arpana
Verdegem, Dries
Böcker, Sebastian
Rousu, Juho
Shen, Huibin
Tsugawa, Hiroshi
Sajed, Tanvir
Fiehn, Oliver
Ghesquière, Bart
Neumann, Steffen
Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title_full Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title_fullStr Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title_full_unstemmed Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title_short Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification 2016: automated methods
title_sort critical assessment of small molecule identification 2016: automated methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29086042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0207-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schymanskiemmal criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT ruttkieschristoph criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT kraussmartin criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT brouardceline criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT kindtobias criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT duhrkopkai criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT allenfelicity criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT vaniyaarpana criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT verdegemdries criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT bockersebastian criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT rousujuho criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT shenhuibin criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT tsugawahiroshi criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT sajedtanvir criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT fiehnoliver criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT ghesquierebart criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods
AT neumannsteffen criticalassessmentofsmallmoleculeidentification2016automatedmethods