Cargando…
How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between lingu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y |
_version_ | 1782517879042736128 |
---|---|
author | Lev-Ari, Shiri Shao, Zeshu |
author_facet | Lev-Ari, Shiri Shao, Zeshu |
author_sort | Lev-Ari, Shiri |
collection | PubMed |
description | People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between linguistic performance and 3 social network properties that should influence input variability, namely, network size, network heterogeneity, and network density. In particular, we examine how these social network properties influence lexical prediction, lexical access, and lexical use. To do so, in Study 1, participants predicted how people of different ages would name pictures, and in Study 2 participants named the pictures themselves. In both studies, we examined how participants’ social network properties related to their performance. In Study 3, we ran simulations on norms we collected to see how age variability in one’s network influences the distribution of different names in the input. In all studies, network age heterogeneity influenced performance leading to better prediction, faster response times for difficult-to-name items, and less entropy in input distribution. These results suggest that individual differences in social network properties can influence linguistic behavior. Specifically, they show that having a more heterogeneous network is associated with better performance. These results also show that the same factors influence lexical prediction and lexical production, suggesting the two might be related. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5368194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53681942017-04-11 How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction Lev-Ari, Shiri Shao, Zeshu Mem Cognit Article People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between linguistic performance and 3 social network properties that should influence input variability, namely, network size, network heterogeneity, and network density. In particular, we examine how these social network properties influence lexical prediction, lexical access, and lexical use. To do so, in Study 1, participants predicted how people of different ages would name pictures, and in Study 2 participants named the pictures themselves. In both studies, we examined how participants’ social network properties related to their performance. In Study 3, we ran simulations on norms we collected to see how age variability in one’s network influences the distribution of different names in the input. In all studies, network age heterogeneity influenced performance leading to better prediction, faster response times for difficult-to-name items, and less entropy in input distribution. These results suggest that individual differences in social network properties can influence linguistic behavior. Specifically, they show that having a more heterogeneous network is associated with better performance. These results also show that the same factors influence lexical prediction and lexical production, suggesting the two might be related. Springer US 2016-11-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5368194/ /pubmed/27896710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Lev-Ari, Shiri Shao, Zeshu How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title | How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title_full | How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title_fullStr | How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title_short | How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
title_sort | how social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levarishiri howsocialnetworkheterogeneityfacilitateslexicalaccessandlexicalprediction AT shaozeshu howsocialnetworkheterogeneityfacilitateslexicalaccessandlexicalprediction |