Cargando…

How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction

People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between lingu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lev-Ari, Shiri, Shao, Zeshu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y
_version_ 1782517879042736128
author Lev-Ari, Shiri
Shao, Zeshu
author_facet Lev-Ari, Shiri
Shao, Zeshu
author_sort Lev-Ari, Shiri
collection PubMed
description People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between linguistic performance and 3 social network properties that should influence input variability, namely, network size, network heterogeneity, and network density. In particular, we examine how these social network properties influence lexical prediction, lexical access, and lexical use. To do so, in Study 1, participants predicted how people of different ages would name pictures, and in Study 2 participants named the pictures themselves. In both studies, we examined how participants’ social network properties related to their performance. In Study 3, we ran simulations on norms we collected to see how age variability in one’s network influences the distribution of different names in the input. In all studies, network age heterogeneity influenced performance leading to better prediction, faster response times for difficult-to-name items, and less entropy in input distribution. These results suggest that individual differences in social network properties can influence linguistic behavior. Specifically, they show that having a more heterogeneous network is associated with better performance. These results also show that the same factors influence lexical prediction and lexical production, suggesting the two might be related.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5368194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53681942017-04-11 How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction Lev-Ari, Shiri Shao, Zeshu Mem Cognit Article People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between linguistic performance and 3 social network properties that should influence input variability, namely, network size, network heterogeneity, and network density. In particular, we examine how these social network properties influence lexical prediction, lexical access, and lexical use. To do so, in Study 1, participants predicted how people of different ages would name pictures, and in Study 2 participants named the pictures themselves. In both studies, we examined how participants’ social network properties related to their performance. In Study 3, we ran simulations on norms we collected to see how age variability in one’s network influences the distribution of different names in the input. In all studies, network age heterogeneity influenced performance leading to better prediction, faster response times for difficult-to-name items, and less entropy in input distribution. These results suggest that individual differences in social network properties can influence linguistic behavior. Specifically, they show that having a more heterogeneous network is associated with better performance. These results also show that the same factors influence lexical prediction and lexical production, suggesting the two might be related. Springer US 2016-11-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5368194/ /pubmed/27896710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Lev-Ari, Shiri
Shao, Zeshu
How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title_full How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title_fullStr How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title_full_unstemmed How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title_short How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
title_sort how social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y
work_keys_str_mv AT levarishiri howsocialnetworkheterogeneityfacilitateslexicalaccessandlexicalprediction
AT shaozeshu howsocialnetworkheterogeneityfacilitateslexicalaccessandlexicalprediction