Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys

Bacterial taxonomic community analyses using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing has become a cornerstone in microbiology research. To reliably detect the members, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), that make up bacterial communities, taxonomic surveys rely on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thijs, Sofie, Op De Beeck, Michiel, Beckers, Bram, Truyens, Sascha, Stevens, Vincent, Van Hamme, Jonathan D., Weyens, Nele, Vangronsveld, Jaco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00494
_version_ 1782517886432051200
author Thijs, Sofie
Op De Beeck, Michiel
Beckers, Bram
Truyens, Sascha
Stevens, Vincent
Van Hamme, Jonathan D.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
author_facet Thijs, Sofie
Op De Beeck, Michiel
Beckers, Bram
Truyens, Sascha
Stevens, Vincent
Van Hamme, Jonathan D.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
author_sort Thijs, Sofie
collection PubMed
description Bacterial taxonomic community analyses using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing has become a cornerstone in microbiology research. To reliably detect the members, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), that make up bacterial communities, taxonomic surveys rely on the use of the most informative PCR primers to amplify the broad range of phylotypes present in up-to-date reference databases. However, primers specific for the domain Bacteria were often developed some time ago against database versions that are now out of date. Here we evaluated the performance of four bacterial primers for characterizing complex microbial communities in explosives contaminated and non-contaminated forest soil and by in silico evaluation against the current SILVA123 database. Primer pair 341f/785r produced the highest number of bacterial OTUs, phylogenetic richness, Shannon diversity, low non-specificity and most reproducible results, followed by 967f/1391r and 799f/1193r. Primer pair 68f/518r showed overall low coverage and a bias toward Alphaproteobacteria. In silico, primer pair 341f/785r showed the highest coverage of the domain Bacteria (96.1%) with no obvious bias toward the majority of bacterial species. This suggests the high utility of primer pair 341f/785r for soil and plant-associated bacterial microbiome studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5368227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53682272017-04-11 Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys Thijs, Sofie Op De Beeck, Michiel Beckers, Bram Truyens, Sascha Stevens, Vincent Van Hamme, Jonathan D. Weyens, Nele Vangronsveld, Jaco Front Microbiol Microbiology Bacterial taxonomic community analyses using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing has become a cornerstone in microbiology research. To reliably detect the members, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), that make up bacterial communities, taxonomic surveys rely on the use of the most informative PCR primers to amplify the broad range of phylotypes present in up-to-date reference databases. However, primers specific for the domain Bacteria were often developed some time ago against database versions that are now out of date. Here we evaluated the performance of four bacterial primers for characterizing complex microbial communities in explosives contaminated and non-contaminated forest soil and by in silico evaluation against the current SILVA123 database. Primer pair 341f/785r produced the highest number of bacterial OTUs, phylogenetic richness, Shannon diversity, low non-specificity and most reproducible results, followed by 967f/1391r and 799f/1193r. Primer pair 68f/518r showed overall low coverage and a bias toward Alphaproteobacteria. In silico, primer pair 341f/785r showed the highest coverage of the domain Bacteria (96.1%) with no obvious bias toward the majority of bacterial species. This suggests the high utility of primer pair 341f/785r for soil and plant-associated bacterial microbiome studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5368227/ /pubmed/28400755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00494 Text en Copyright © 2017 Thijs, Op De Beeck, Beckers, Truyens, Stevens, Van Hamme, Weyens and Vangronsveld. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Thijs, Sofie
Op De Beeck, Michiel
Beckers, Bram
Truyens, Sascha
Stevens, Vincent
Van Hamme, Jonathan D.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys
title_sort comparative evaluation of four bacteria-specific primer pairs for 16s rrna gene surveys
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00494
work_keys_str_mv AT thijssofie comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT opdebeeckmichiel comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT beckersbram comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT truyenssascha comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT stevensvincent comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT vanhammejonathand comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT weyensnele comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys
AT vangronsveldjaco comparativeevaluationoffourbacteriaspecificprimerpairsfor16srrnagenesurveys