Cargando…

Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types

Plants take up silicon as mono-silicic acid, which is released to soil by the weathering of silicate minerals. Silicic acid can be taken up by plant roots passively or actively, and later it is deposited in its polymerized form as amorphous hydrated silica. Major silica depositions in grasses occur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Santosh, Soukup, Milan, Elbaum, Rivka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00438
_version_ 1782517893664079872
author Kumar, Santosh
Soukup, Milan
Elbaum, Rivka
author_facet Kumar, Santosh
Soukup, Milan
Elbaum, Rivka
author_sort Kumar, Santosh
collection PubMed
description Plants take up silicon as mono-silicic acid, which is released to soil by the weathering of silicate minerals. Silicic acid can be taken up by plant roots passively or actively, and later it is deposited in its polymerized form as amorphous hydrated silica. Major silica depositions in grasses occur in root endodermis, leaf epidermal cells, and outer epidermal cells of inflorescence bracts. Debates are rife about the mechanism of silica deposition, and two contrasting scenarios are often proposed to explain it. According to the passive mode of silicification, silica deposition is a result of silicic acid condensation due to dehydration, such as during transpirational loss of water from the aboveground organs. In general, silicification and transpiration are positively correlated, and continued silicification is sometimes observed after cell and tissue maturity. The other mode of silicification proposes the involvement of some biological factors, and is based on observations that silicification is not necessarily coupled with transpiration. Here, we review evidence for both mechanisms of silicification, and propose that the deposition mechanism is specific to the cell type. Considering all the cell types together, our conclusion is that grass silica deposition can be divided into three modes: spontaneous cell wall silicification, directed cell wall silicification, and directed paramural silicification in silica cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5368260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53682602017-04-11 Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types Kumar, Santosh Soukup, Milan Elbaum, Rivka Front Plant Sci Plant Science Plants take up silicon as mono-silicic acid, which is released to soil by the weathering of silicate minerals. Silicic acid can be taken up by plant roots passively or actively, and later it is deposited in its polymerized form as amorphous hydrated silica. Major silica depositions in grasses occur in root endodermis, leaf epidermal cells, and outer epidermal cells of inflorescence bracts. Debates are rife about the mechanism of silica deposition, and two contrasting scenarios are often proposed to explain it. According to the passive mode of silicification, silica deposition is a result of silicic acid condensation due to dehydration, such as during transpirational loss of water from the aboveground organs. In general, silicification and transpiration are positively correlated, and continued silicification is sometimes observed after cell and tissue maturity. The other mode of silicification proposes the involvement of some biological factors, and is based on observations that silicification is not necessarily coupled with transpiration. Here, we review evidence for both mechanisms of silicification, and propose that the deposition mechanism is specific to the cell type. Considering all the cell types together, our conclusion is that grass silica deposition can be divided into three modes: spontaneous cell wall silicification, directed cell wall silicification, and directed paramural silicification in silica cells. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5368260/ /pubmed/28400787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00438 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kumar, Soukup and Elbaum. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Kumar, Santosh
Soukup, Milan
Elbaum, Rivka
Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title_full Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title_fullStr Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title_full_unstemmed Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title_short Silicification in Grasses: Variation between Different Cell Types
title_sort silicification in grasses: variation between different cell types
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00438
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarsantosh silicificationingrassesvariationbetweendifferentcelltypes
AT soukupmilan silicificationingrassesvariationbetweendifferentcelltypes
AT elbaumrivka silicificationingrassesvariationbetweendifferentcelltypes