Cargando…
Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy
BACKGROUND: In newborns and children, body fat estimation equations are often used at different ages than the age used to develop the equations. Limited validation studies exist for newborn body fat estimation equations at birth or later in infancy. The study purpose was to validate 4 newborn fat ma...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0844-6 |
_version_ | 1782518039026073600 |
---|---|
author | Cauble, Jennifer S. Dewi, Mira Hull, Holly R. |
author_facet | Cauble, Jennifer S. Dewi, Mira Hull, Holly R. |
author_sort | Cauble, Jennifer S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In newborns and children, body fat estimation equations are often used at different ages than the age used to develop the equations. Limited validation studies exist for newborn body fat estimation equations at birth or later in infancy. The study purpose was to validate 4 newborn fat mass (FM) estimation equations in comparison to FM measured by air displacement plethysmography (ADP; the Pea Pod) at birth and 3 months. METHODS: Ninety-five newborns (1–3 days) had their body composition measured by ADP and anthropometrics assessed by skinfolds. Sixty-three infants had repeat measures taken (3 months). FM measured by ADP was compared to FM from the skinfold estimation equations (Deierlein, Catalano, Lingwood, and Aris). Paired t-tests assessed mean differences, linear regression assessed accuracy, precision was assessed by R(2) and standard error of the estimate (SEE), and bias was assessed by Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: At birth, FM measured by ADP differed from FM estimated by Deierlein, Lingwood and Aris equations, but did not differ from the Catalano equation. At 3 months, FM measured by ADP was different from all equations. At both time points, poor precision and accuracy was detected. Bias was detected in most all equations. CONCLUSIONS: Poor agreement, precision, and accuracy were found between prediction equations and the criterion at birth and 3 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5368988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53689882017-03-30 Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy Cauble, Jennifer S. Dewi, Mira Hull, Holly R. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: In newborns and children, body fat estimation equations are often used at different ages than the age used to develop the equations. Limited validation studies exist for newborn body fat estimation equations at birth or later in infancy. The study purpose was to validate 4 newborn fat mass (FM) estimation equations in comparison to FM measured by air displacement plethysmography (ADP; the Pea Pod) at birth and 3 months. METHODS: Ninety-five newborns (1–3 days) had their body composition measured by ADP and anthropometrics assessed by skinfolds. Sixty-three infants had repeat measures taken (3 months). FM measured by ADP was compared to FM from the skinfold estimation equations (Deierlein, Catalano, Lingwood, and Aris). Paired t-tests assessed mean differences, linear regression assessed accuracy, precision was assessed by R(2) and standard error of the estimate (SEE), and bias was assessed by Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: At birth, FM measured by ADP differed from FM estimated by Deierlein, Lingwood and Aris equations, but did not differ from the Catalano equation. At 3 months, FM measured by ADP was different from all equations. At both time points, poor precision and accuracy was detected. Bias was detected in most all equations. CONCLUSIONS: Poor agreement, precision, and accuracy were found between prediction equations and the criterion at birth and 3 months. BioMed Central 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5368988/ /pubmed/28347278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0844-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cauble, Jennifer S. Dewi, Mira Hull, Holly R. Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title | Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title_full | Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title_fullStr | Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title_short | Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
title_sort | validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0844-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caublejennifers validityofanthropometricequationstoestimateinfantfatmassatbirthandinearlyinfancy AT dewimira validityofanthropometricequationstoestimateinfantfatmassatbirthandinearlyinfancy AT hullhollyr validityofanthropometricequationstoestimateinfantfatmassatbirthandinearlyinfancy |