Cargando…

The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatch, Robert, Young, Duncan, Barber, Vicki, Harrison, David A, Watkinson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3
_version_ 1782518039888003072
author Hatch, Robert
Young, Duncan
Barber, Vicki
Harrison, David A
Watkinson, Peter
author_facet Hatch, Robert
Young, Duncan
Barber, Vicki
Harrison, David A
Watkinson, Peter
author_sort Hatch, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group randomised controlled trial. We assigned patients by computer-based randomisation to one of two questionnaire packs (Group A and Group B). Setting: Patients from 26 ICUs in the United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria: Patients who had received at least 24 h of level 3 care and were 16 years of age or older. Patients did not know that there were different questionnaire burdens. The study included 18,490 patients. 12,170 were eligible to be sent a questionnaire pack at 3 months. We sent 12,105 questionnaires (6112 to group A and 5993 to group B). Interventions: The Group A pack contained demographic and EuroQol group 5 Dimensions 3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) questionnaires, making four questionnaire pages. The Group B pack also contained the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List-Civilian (PCL-C) questionnaires, making eight questionnaire pages in total. Main outcome measure: Questionnaire return rate 3 months after ICU discharge by group. RESULTS: In group A, 2466/6112 (40.3%) participants responded at 3 months. In group B 2315/ 5993 (38.6%) participants responded (difference 1.7% CI for difference 0–3.5% p = 0.053). Group A reported better functionality than group B in the EQ-5D-3 L mobility (41% versus 37% reporting no problems p = 0.003) and anxiety/depression (59% versus 55% reporting no problems p = 0.017) domains. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of intensive care, questionnaire burden had no effect on return rates. However, questionnaire burden affected answers to the same questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69112866 (assigned 02/05/2006). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5368992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53689922017-03-30 The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial Hatch, Robert Young, Duncan Barber, Vicki Harrison, David A Watkinson, Peter BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group randomised controlled trial. We assigned patients by computer-based randomisation to one of two questionnaire packs (Group A and Group B). Setting: Patients from 26 ICUs in the United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria: Patients who had received at least 24 h of level 3 care and were 16 years of age or older. Patients did not know that there were different questionnaire burdens. The study included 18,490 patients. 12,170 were eligible to be sent a questionnaire pack at 3 months. We sent 12,105 questionnaires (6112 to group A and 5993 to group B). Interventions: The Group A pack contained demographic and EuroQol group 5 Dimensions 3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) questionnaires, making four questionnaire pages. The Group B pack also contained the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List-Civilian (PCL-C) questionnaires, making eight questionnaire pages in total. Main outcome measure: Questionnaire return rate 3 months after ICU discharge by group. RESULTS: In group A, 2466/6112 (40.3%) participants responded at 3 months. In group B 2315/ 5993 (38.6%) participants responded (difference 1.7% CI for difference 0–3.5% p = 0.053). Group A reported better functionality than group B in the EQ-5D-3 L mobility (41% versus 37% reporting no problems p = 0.003) and anxiety/depression (59% versus 55% reporting no problems p = 0.017) domains. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of intensive care, questionnaire burden had no effect on return rates. However, questionnaire burden affected answers to the same questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69112866 (assigned 02/05/2006). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5368992/ /pubmed/28347296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hatch, Robert
Young, Duncan
Barber, Vicki
Harrison, David A
Watkinson, Peter
The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hatchrobert theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT youngduncan theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barbervicki theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisondavida theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watkinsonpeter theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hatchrobert effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT youngduncan effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barbervicki effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisondavida effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watkinsonpeter effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial