Cargando…
The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3 |
_version_ | 1782518039888003072 |
---|---|
author | Hatch, Robert Young, Duncan Barber, Vicki Harrison, David A Watkinson, Peter |
author_facet | Hatch, Robert Young, Duncan Barber, Vicki Harrison, David A Watkinson, Peter |
author_sort | Hatch, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group randomised controlled trial. We assigned patients by computer-based randomisation to one of two questionnaire packs (Group A and Group B). Setting: Patients from 26 ICUs in the United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria: Patients who had received at least 24 h of level 3 care and were 16 years of age or older. Patients did not know that there were different questionnaire burdens. The study included 18,490 patients. 12,170 were eligible to be sent a questionnaire pack at 3 months. We sent 12,105 questionnaires (6112 to group A and 5993 to group B). Interventions: The Group A pack contained demographic and EuroQol group 5 Dimensions 3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) questionnaires, making four questionnaire pages. The Group B pack also contained the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List-Civilian (PCL-C) questionnaires, making eight questionnaire pages in total. Main outcome measure: Questionnaire return rate 3 months after ICU discharge by group. RESULTS: In group A, 2466/6112 (40.3%) participants responded at 3 months. In group B 2315/ 5993 (38.6%) participants responded (difference 1.7% CI for difference 0–3.5% p = 0.053). Group A reported better functionality than group B in the EQ-5D-3 L mobility (41% versus 37% reporting no problems p = 0.003) and anxiety/depression (59% versus 55% reporting no problems p = 0.017) domains. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of intensive care, questionnaire burden had no effect on return rates. However, questionnaire burden affected answers to the same questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69112866 (assigned 02/05/2006). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5368992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53689922017-03-30 The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial Hatch, Robert Young, Duncan Barber, Vicki Harrison, David A Watkinson, Peter BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The effects of postal questionnaire burden on return rates and answers given are unclear following treatment on an intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to establish the effects of different postal questionnaire burdens on return rates and answers given. METHODS: Design: A parallel group randomised controlled trial. We assigned patients by computer-based randomisation to one of two questionnaire packs (Group A and Group B). Setting: Patients from 26 ICUs in the United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria: Patients who had received at least 24 h of level 3 care and were 16 years of age or older. Patients did not know that there were different questionnaire burdens. The study included 18,490 patients. 12,170 were eligible to be sent a questionnaire pack at 3 months. We sent 12,105 questionnaires (6112 to group A and 5993 to group B). Interventions: The Group A pack contained demographic and EuroQol group 5 Dimensions 3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) questionnaires, making four questionnaire pages. The Group B pack also contained the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List-Civilian (PCL-C) questionnaires, making eight questionnaire pages in total. Main outcome measure: Questionnaire return rate 3 months after ICU discharge by group. RESULTS: In group A, 2466/6112 (40.3%) participants responded at 3 months. In group B 2315/ 5993 (38.6%) participants responded (difference 1.7% CI for difference 0–3.5% p = 0.053). Group A reported better functionality than group B in the EQ-5D-3 L mobility (41% versus 37% reporting no problems p = 0.003) and anxiety/depression (59% versus 55% reporting no problems p = 0.017) domains. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of intensive care, questionnaire burden had no effect on return rates. However, questionnaire burden affected answers to the same questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69112866 (assigned 02/05/2006). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5368992/ /pubmed/28347296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hatch, Robert Young, Duncan Barber, Vicki Harrison, David A Watkinson, Peter The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title | The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of postal questionnaire burden on response rate and answer patterns following admission to intensive care: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5368992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0319-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatchrobert theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT youngduncan theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT barbervicki theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisondavida theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watkinsonpeter theeffectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hatchrobert effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT youngduncan effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT barbervicki effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisondavida effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watkinsonpeter effectofpostalquestionnaireburdenonresponserateandanswerpatternsfollowingadmissiontointensivecarearandomisedcontrolledtrial |