Cargando…
Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients
INTRODUCTION: Cryptosporidium species is the most common opportunistic enteric parasite encountered in the immunocompromised patients. Considering the need to diagnose them early relies mostly on rapid tests such as antigen detection by immunochromatographic test (ICT), ELISA, and microscopy. Howeve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28459014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tp.TP_66_16 |
_version_ | 1782518096448192512 |
---|---|
author | Vanathy, K Parija, Subhash Chandra Mandal, Jharna Hamide, Abdoul Krishnamurthy, Sriram |
author_facet | Vanathy, K Parija, Subhash Chandra Mandal, Jharna Hamide, Abdoul Krishnamurthy, Sriram |
author_sort | Vanathy, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cryptosporidium species is the most common opportunistic enteric parasite encountered in the immunocompromised patients. Considering the need to diagnose them early relies mostly on rapid tests such as antigen detection by immunochromatographic test (ICT), ELISA, and microscopy. However, the sensitivity and specificity varies with different methods and different kits used. This study was conducted to determine the intestinal parasitic profile in immunocompromised patients and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ICT using ImmunoCard STAT kit in detecting Cryptosporidium spp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients in this study were divided into two groups: one group was immunocompromised patients (n = 73) and the other was nonimmunocompromised individuals (n = 73). Stool microscopy, ICT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were carried out for all stool samples. RESULTS: Totally, 4 (5.4%) of 73 patients of the study group were positive for Cryptosporidium. The species detected were Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis. PCR was taken as gold standard in the current study. PCR detected Cryptosporidium in four samples while ICT in two samples and microscopy in one sample. CONCLUSION: Cryptosporidium was found to be the most common enteric parasite in the immunocompromised patients studied, followed by Cystoisospora, Entamoeba histolytica, and Strongyloides stercoralis. Although the ICT is a rapid test, it was less sensitive and more expensive in comparison to the PCR; hence, its utility appears to be limited in our setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5369273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53692732017-04-28 Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients Vanathy, K Parija, Subhash Chandra Mandal, Jharna Hamide, Abdoul Krishnamurthy, Sriram Trop Parasitol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Cryptosporidium species is the most common opportunistic enteric parasite encountered in the immunocompromised patients. Considering the need to diagnose them early relies mostly on rapid tests such as antigen detection by immunochromatographic test (ICT), ELISA, and microscopy. However, the sensitivity and specificity varies with different methods and different kits used. This study was conducted to determine the intestinal parasitic profile in immunocompromised patients and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ICT using ImmunoCard STAT kit in detecting Cryptosporidium spp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients in this study were divided into two groups: one group was immunocompromised patients (n = 73) and the other was nonimmunocompromised individuals (n = 73). Stool microscopy, ICT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were carried out for all stool samples. RESULTS: Totally, 4 (5.4%) of 73 patients of the study group were positive for Cryptosporidium. The species detected were Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis. PCR was taken as gold standard in the current study. PCR detected Cryptosporidium in four samples while ICT in two samples and microscopy in one sample. CONCLUSION: Cryptosporidium was found to be the most common enteric parasite in the immunocompromised patients studied, followed by Cystoisospora, Entamoeba histolytica, and Strongyloides stercoralis. Although the ICT is a rapid test, it was less sensitive and more expensive in comparison to the PCR; hence, its utility appears to be limited in our setting. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5369273/ /pubmed/28459014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tp.TP_66_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Tropical Parasitology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vanathy, K Parija, Subhash Chandra Mandal, Jharna Hamide, Abdoul Krishnamurthy, Sriram Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title | Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title_full | Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title_fullStr | Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title_short | Detection of Cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
title_sort | detection of cryptosporidium in stool samples of immunocompromised patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28459014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tp.TP_66_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanathyk detectionofcryptosporidiuminstoolsamplesofimmunocompromisedpatients AT parijasubhashchandra detectionofcryptosporidiuminstoolsamplesofimmunocompromisedpatients AT mandaljharna detectionofcryptosporidiuminstoolsamplesofimmunocompromisedpatients AT hamideabdoul detectionofcryptosporidiuminstoolsamplesofimmunocompromisedpatients AT krishnamurthysriram detectionofcryptosporidiuminstoolsamplesofimmunocompromisedpatients |