Cargando…

Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with 75% of stromal dissection (predescemetic group) and femtosecond laser-assisted DALK using big-bubble technique with total stromal resection (descemetic g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yan, Grisolia, Ana Beatriz Diniz, Ge, Yi-Rui, Xue, Chun-Yan, Cao, Qian, Yang, Li-Ping, Huang, Zhen-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300735
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_688_16
_version_ 1782518099292979200
author Lu, Yan
Grisolia, Ana Beatriz Diniz
Ge, Yi-Rui
Xue, Chun-Yan
Cao, Qian
Yang, Li-Ping
Huang, Zhen-Ping
author_facet Lu, Yan
Grisolia, Ana Beatriz Diniz
Ge, Yi-Rui
Xue, Chun-Yan
Cao, Qian
Yang, Li-Ping
Huang, Zhen-Ping
author_sort Lu, Yan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with 75% of stromal dissection (predescemetic group) and femtosecond laser-assisted DALK using big-bubble technique with total stromal resection (descemetic group) for the treatment of keratoconus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty eyes of 17 patients with keratoconus were studied. There were 10 eyes of 9 patients in predescemetic group and 10 eyes of 8 patients in descemetic group. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, keratometry, endothelial cell density (ECD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed uneventfully. At 1 year after surgery, the BCVA, corneal astigmatism, keratometry, CCT, and ECD between two groups were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). However, the mean manifest refraction was −9.43 ± 7.44 diopter (D) and −1.03 ± 1.13D in predescemetic and descemetic groups, respectively, which was statistically significant between two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of BCVA and corneal astigmatism, keratometry, ECD, and CCT were comparable between two groups. However, the mean postoperative manifest refraction was lower in descemetic group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5369287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53692872017-04-11 Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus Lu, Yan Grisolia, Ana Beatriz Diniz Ge, Yi-Rui Xue, Chun-Yan Cao, Qian Yang, Li-Ping Huang, Zhen-Ping Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with 75% of stromal dissection (predescemetic group) and femtosecond laser-assisted DALK using big-bubble technique with total stromal resection (descemetic group) for the treatment of keratoconus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty eyes of 17 patients with keratoconus were studied. There were 10 eyes of 9 patients in predescemetic group and 10 eyes of 8 patients in descemetic group. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, keratometry, endothelial cell density (ECD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed uneventfully. At 1 year after surgery, the BCVA, corneal astigmatism, keratometry, CCT, and ECD between two groups were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). However, the mean manifest refraction was −9.43 ± 7.44 diopter (D) and −1.03 ± 1.13D in predescemetic and descemetic groups, respectively, which was statistically significant between two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of BCVA and corneal astigmatism, keratometry, ECD, and CCT were comparable between two groups. However, the mean postoperative manifest refraction was lower in descemetic group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5369287/ /pubmed/28300735 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_688_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lu, Yan
Grisolia, Ana Beatriz Diniz
Ge, Yi-Rui
Xue, Chun-Yan
Cao, Qian
Yang, Li-Ping
Huang, Zhen-Ping
Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title_full Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title_fullStr Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title_short Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
title_sort comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetic and predescemetic lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300735
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_688_16
work_keys_str_mv AT luyan comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT grisoliaanabeatrizdiniz comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT geyirui comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT xuechunyan comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT caoqian comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT yangliping comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus
AT huangzhenping comparisonoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemeticandpredescemeticlamellarkeratoplastyforkeratoconus