Cargando…
Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation
The scientific foundation for the criticism on the use of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) in evaluations of individual researchers and their publications was laid between 1989 and 1997 in a series of articles by Per O. Seglen. His basic work has since influenced initiatives such as the San Francisco...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174205 |
_version_ | 1782518132356677632 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lin Rousseau, Ronald Sivertsen, Gunnar |
author_facet | Zhang, Lin Rousseau, Ronald Sivertsen, Gunnar |
author_sort | Zhang, Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The scientific foundation for the criticism on the use of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) in evaluations of individual researchers and their publications was laid between 1989 and 1997 in a series of articles by Per O. Seglen. His basic work has since influenced initiatives such as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, and The Metric Tide review on the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Seglen studied the publications of only 16 senior biomedical scientists. We investigate whether Seglen’s main findings still hold when using the same methods for a much larger group of Norwegian biomedical scientists with more than 18,000 publications. Our results support and add new insights to Seglen’s basic work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5369779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53697792017-04-06 Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation Zhang, Lin Rousseau, Ronald Sivertsen, Gunnar PLoS One Research Article The scientific foundation for the criticism on the use of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) in evaluations of individual researchers and their publications was laid between 1989 and 1997 in a series of articles by Per O. Seglen. His basic work has since influenced initiatives such as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, and The Metric Tide review on the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Seglen studied the publications of only 16 senior biomedical scientists. We investigate whether Seglen’s main findings still hold when using the same methods for a much larger group of Norwegian biomedical scientists with more than 18,000 publications. Our results support and add new insights to Seglen’s basic work. Public Library of Science 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5369779/ /pubmed/28350849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174205 Text en © 2017 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Lin Rousseau, Ronald Sivertsen, Gunnar Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title | Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title_full | Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title_fullStr | Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title_short | Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
title_sort | science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: revisiting seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglin sciencedeservestobejudgedbyitscontentsnotbyitswrappingrevisitingseglensworkonjournalimpactandresearchevaluation AT rousseauronald sciencedeservestobejudgedbyitscontentsnotbyitswrappingrevisitingseglensworkonjournalimpactandresearchevaluation AT sivertsengunnar sciencedeservestobejudgedbyitscontentsnotbyitswrappingrevisitingseglensworkonjournalimpactandresearchevaluation |