Cargando…

Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis

Data regarding the association between surgical margin status and the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy (RC) are conflicting. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess the associations between the outcomes of bladder cancer, in terms of recurrence-free surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Xuwei, Li, Tieqiu, Ling, Fengsheng, Yang, Dashan, Hou, Lina, Li, Fei, Tan, Wanlong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27791991
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12907
_version_ 1782518174353195008
author Hong, Xuwei
Li, Tieqiu
Ling, Fengsheng
Yang, Dashan
Hou, Lina
Li, Fei
Tan, Wanlong
author_facet Hong, Xuwei
Li, Tieqiu
Ling, Fengsheng
Yang, Dashan
Hou, Lina
Li, Fei
Tan, Wanlong
author_sort Hong, Xuwei
collection PubMed
description Data regarding the association between surgical margin status and the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy (RC) are conflicting. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess the associations between the outcomes of bladder cancer, in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), and the presence of positive surgical margins versus negative surgical margins following treatment with RC. Research articles published prior to April 2016 were identified from Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. A total of 36 articles were included, with a sample size of 38,384 bladder cancer patients. Of these, 4,354 patients were reported to have positive surgical margins. Significant associations were detected between positive surgical margins following RC and unfavorable RFS [summary relative risk estimate (SRRE), 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-1.83; P = 0.105], CSS (SRRE, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.63-2.04; P = 0.001) and OS (SRRE, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.58-1.80; P = 0.805), by fixed or random effects models. The findings were consistent independently of age, sample size, publication year, follow-up duration, study type and geographical region. In summary, the present findings demonstrate that the presence of positive surgical margins is associated with poor survival outcomes in bladder cancer following RC, indicating that avoidance of positive surgical margins during surgery is helpful to improve the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53700382017-04-17 Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis Hong, Xuwei Li, Tieqiu Ling, Fengsheng Yang, Dashan Hou, Lina Li, Fei Tan, Wanlong Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper Data regarding the association between surgical margin status and the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy (RC) are conflicting. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess the associations between the outcomes of bladder cancer, in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), and the presence of positive surgical margins versus negative surgical margins following treatment with RC. Research articles published prior to April 2016 were identified from Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. A total of 36 articles were included, with a sample size of 38,384 bladder cancer patients. Of these, 4,354 patients were reported to have positive surgical margins. Significant associations were detected between positive surgical margins following RC and unfavorable RFS [summary relative risk estimate (SRRE), 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-1.83; P = 0.105], CSS (SRRE, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.63-2.04; P = 0.001) and OS (SRRE, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.58-1.80; P = 0.805), by fixed or random effects models. The findings were consistent independently of age, sample size, publication year, follow-up duration, study type and geographical region. In summary, the present findings demonstrate that the presence of positive surgical margins is associated with poor survival outcomes in bladder cancer following RC, indicating that avoidance of positive surgical margins during surgery is helpful to improve the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer. Impact Journals LLC 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5370038/ /pubmed/27791991 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12907 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Hong, Xuwei
Li, Tieqiu
Ling, Fengsheng
Yang, Dashan
Hou, Lina
Li, Fei
Tan, Wanlong
Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_full Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_short Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_sort impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27791991
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12907
work_keys_str_mv AT hongxuwei impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT litieqiu impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT lingfengsheng impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT yangdashan impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT houlina impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT lifei impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis
AT tanwanlong impactofsurgicalmarginstatusontheoutcomeofbladdercancertreatedbyradicalcystectomyametaanalysis