Cargando…

Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter ablation vs. direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to define baseline features of patients that will get more benefit from ablation. METHODS: Fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Maojing, Cai, Shanglang, Ding, Wei, Deng, Yujie, Zhao, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174510
_version_ 1782518187876679680
author Wang, Maojing
Cai, Shanglang
Ding, Wei
Deng, Yujie
Zhao, Qing
author_facet Wang, Maojing
Cai, Shanglang
Ding, Wei
Deng, Yujie
Zhao, Qing
author_sort Wang, Maojing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter ablation vs. direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to define baseline features of patients that will get more benefit from ablation. METHODS: From July 2013 to October 2014, 97 consecutive single-center patients with persistent AF and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%) underwent DCC followed by amiodarone (n = 40) or circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 57) according to patient’s preference were recruited in the study. Post-ablation recurrence was treated with atrial roof and mitral isthmus lines ablation with or without PVI based on restoration or not of pulmonary vein (PV) potential conduction. Study outcomes were 12-month rate of sustained sinus rhythm (SR) and cardiac function. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without cardiac function improvement post ablation. RESULTS: With similarly distributed characteristics at baseline, ablation (mean 1.8 procedures) relative to DCC yielded significantly higher level of 12-month SR maintenance rate (68.42% vs. 35%, P = 0.001); and better LVEF and New York Heart Association class. with significant effect for DCC only in maintained SR cases. Post ablation LVEF increased (>20% or to over 55%) in 31 (54.39%) patients with worse baseline cardiac function and ventricular rate control. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation relative to cardioversion of persistent AF with symptomatic heart failure yielded better 12-month SR maintenance and cardiac function. Compared with non-responders, patients with improved LVEF post-ablation had poorer ventricular rate control and cardiac function at baseline, suggesting a significant component of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in this group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53701312017-04-06 Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction Wang, Maojing Cai, Shanglang Ding, Wei Deng, Yujie Zhao, Qing PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter ablation vs. direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to define baseline features of patients that will get more benefit from ablation. METHODS: From July 2013 to October 2014, 97 consecutive single-center patients with persistent AF and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%) underwent DCC followed by amiodarone (n = 40) or circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 57) according to patient’s preference were recruited in the study. Post-ablation recurrence was treated with atrial roof and mitral isthmus lines ablation with or without PVI based on restoration or not of pulmonary vein (PV) potential conduction. Study outcomes were 12-month rate of sustained sinus rhythm (SR) and cardiac function. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without cardiac function improvement post ablation. RESULTS: With similarly distributed characteristics at baseline, ablation (mean 1.8 procedures) relative to DCC yielded significantly higher level of 12-month SR maintenance rate (68.42% vs. 35%, P = 0.001); and better LVEF and New York Heart Association class. with significant effect for DCC only in maintained SR cases. Post ablation LVEF increased (>20% or to over 55%) in 31 (54.39%) patients with worse baseline cardiac function and ventricular rate control. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation relative to cardioversion of persistent AF with symptomatic heart failure yielded better 12-month SR maintenance and cardiac function. Compared with non-responders, patients with improved LVEF post-ablation had poorer ventricular rate control and cardiac function at baseline, suggesting a significant component of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in this group. Public Library of Science 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5370131/ /pubmed/28350861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174510 Text en © 2017 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Maojing
Cai, Shanglang
Ding, Wei
Deng, Yujie
Zhao, Qing
Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_full Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_fullStr Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_short Efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_sort efficacy and effects on cardiac function of radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. direct current cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174510
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmaojing efficacyandeffectsoncardiacfunctionofradiofrequencycatheterablationvsdirectcurrentcardioversionofpersistentatrialfibrillationwithleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT caishanglang efficacyandeffectsoncardiacfunctionofradiofrequencycatheterablationvsdirectcurrentcardioversionofpersistentatrialfibrillationwithleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT dingwei efficacyandeffectsoncardiacfunctionofradiofrequencycatheterablationvsdirectcurrentcardioversionofpersistentatrialfibrillationwithleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT dengyujie efficacyandeffectsoncardiacfunctionofradiofrequencycatheterablationvsdirectcurrentcardioversionofpersistentatrialfibrillationwithleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT zhaoqing efficacyandeffectsoncardiacfunctionofradiofrequencycatheterablationvsdirectcurrentcardioversionofpersistentatrialfibrillationwithleftventricularsystolicdysfunction