Cargando…

The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost

This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of a hybrid, volumetric arc therapy technique that used two 90° coplanar arcs and two three-dimensional conformal tangential beams in the simultaneous-integrated boost radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. A t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuan-Gui, Li, An-Chuan, Li, Wen-Yao, Huang, Miao-Yun, Li, Xiao-Bo, Chen, Ming-Qiu, Zhang, Mutian, Xu, Ben-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405101
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_105_16
_version_ 1782518219033018368
author Chen, Yuan-Gui
Li, An-Chuan
Li, Wen-Yao
Huang, Miao-Yun
Li, Xiao-Bo
Chen, Ming-Qiu
Zhang, Mutian
Xu, Ben-Hua
author_facet Chen, Yuan-Gui
Li, An-Chuan
Li, Wen-Yao
Huang, Miao-Yun
Li, Xiao-Bo
Chen, Ming-Qiu
Zhang, Mutian
Xu, Ben-Hua
author_sort Chen, Yuan-Gui
collection PubMed
description This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of a hybrid, volumetric arc therapy technique that used two 90° coplanar arcs and two three-dimensional conformal tangential beams in the simultaneous-integrated boost radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. A total of nine patients with stage I, left-sided breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery were selected for this retrospective study. For each patient, a hybrid arc plan was generated and then compared with two hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. All plans were optimized using the same objectives and dose constraints. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume with simultaneous boost to 60 Gy to the expanded gross target volume in 28 fractions. The differences among these hybrid plans were analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The hybrid arc plans achieved the clinical requirements of target dose coverage and normal tissue (NT) dose constraints. It was found that the hybrid arc plans showed advantages in the conformity index of the expanded gross target volume, the V(5) of the heart, the D(2) of the left ventricle, and the D(2) and V(50.4) of NTs. The average beam-on time and monitor units of the hybrid arc plans were significantly lower (P < 0.001).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53703322017-04-12 The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost Chen, Yuan-Gui Li, An-Chuan Li, Wen-Yao Huang, Miao-Yun Li, Xiao-Bo Chen, Ming-Qiu Zhang, Mutian Xu, Ben-Hua J Med Phys Original Article This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of a hybrid, volumetric arc therapy technique that used two 90° coplanar arcs and two three-dimensional conformal tangential beams in the simultaneous-integrated boost radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. A total of nine patients with stage I, left-sided breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery were selected for this retrospective study. For each patient, a hybrid arc plan was generated and then compared with two hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. All plans were optimized using the same objectives and dose constraints. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume with simultaneous boost to 60 Gy to the expanded gross target volume in 28 fractions. The differences among these hybrid plans were analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The hybrid arc plans achieved the clinical requirements of target dose coverage and normal tissue (NT) dose constraints. It was found that the hybrid arc plans showed advantages in the conformity index of the expanded gross target volume, the V(5) of the heart, the D(2) of the left ventricle, and the D(2) and V(50.4) of NTs. The average beam-on time and monitor units of the hybrid arc plans were significantly lower (P < 0.001). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5370332/ /pubmed/28405101 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_105_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Yuan-Gui
Li, An-Chuan
Li, Wen-Yao
Huang, Miao-Yun
Li, Xiao-Bo
Chen, Ming-Qiu
Zhang, Mutian
Xu, Ben-Hua
The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title_full The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title_fullStr The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title_full_unstemmed The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title_short The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost
title_sort feasibility study of a hybrid coplanar arc technique versus hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy in treatment of early-stage left-sided breast cancer with simultaneous-integrated boost
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405101
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_105_16
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuangui thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT lianchuan thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT liwenyao thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT huangmiaoyun thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT lixiaobo thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT chenmingqiu thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT zhangmutian thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT xubenhua thefeasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT chenyuangui feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT lianchuan feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT liwenyao feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT huangmiaoyun feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT lixiaobo feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT chenmingqiu feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT zhangmutian feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT xubenhua feasibilitystudyofahybridcoplanararctechniqueversushybridintensitymodulatedradiotherapyintreatmentofearlystageleftsidedbreastcancerwithsimultaneousintegratedboost