Cargando…
Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams
Response of Al(2)O(3):C-based nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter was studied for the dosimetry of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV therapeutic electron beams. With reference to ionization chamber, no change in the response was observed with the change in the energy of electron beams f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.202424 |
_version_ | 1782518220112003072 |
---|---|
author | Ponmalar, Y. Retna Manickam, Ravikumar Sathiyan, S. Ganesh, K. M. Arun, R. Godson, Henry Finlay |
author_facet | Ponmalar, Y. Retna Manickam, Ravikumar Sathiyan, S. Ganesh, K. M. Arun, R. Godson, Henry Finlay |
author_sort | Ponmalar, Y. Retna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Response of Al(2)O(3):C-based nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter was studied for the dosimetry of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV therapeutic electron beams. With reference to ionization chamber, no change in the response was observed with the change in the energy of electron beams for the field size from 6 cm × 6 cm to 25 cm × 25 cm, dose rates from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min, and the linearity in the response up to 300 cGy. The fading of the transient signal was higher for 20 MeV electron beam than that of 6 MeV electron beam by about 5% as compared to value at 20 min after irradiation. The depletion of OSL signal per readout in 200 successive readouts was also found to change with dose and energy of electron beam from 6 MeV (9% and 12% per readout at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively) to 20 MeV (9% and 16% at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively). The OSL sensitivity changed in the range from 2% to 6% with accumulated doses from 2 to 8 Gy and with electron energy from 6 to 20 MeV, but the sensitivity could be reset using an optical annealing treatment. Although negligible fading for postirradiation storage from 20 min to several months, acceptable precision and linearity in the desired range, and high reproducibility makes nanoDot dosimeters very attractive for the dosimetry of therapeutic electron beams, a note should be made for changes in sensitivity at doses beyond 2 Gy and electron beams energy dependence in reuse, short-term fading, and signal depletion on repeated readout. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5370337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53703372017-04-12 Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams Ponmalar, Y. Retna Manickam, Ravikumar Sathiyan, S. Ganesh, K. M. Arun, R. Godson, Henry Finlay J Med Phys Technical Note Response of Al(2)O(3):C-based nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter was studied for the dosimetry of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV therapeutic electron beams. With reference to ionization chamber, no change in the response was observed with the change in the energy of electron beams for the field size from 6 cm × 6 cm to 25 cm × 25 cm, dose rates from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min, and the linearity in the response up to 300 cGy. The fading of the transient signal was higher for 20 MeV electron beam than that of 6 MeV electron beam by about 5% as compared to value at 20 min after irradiation. The depletion of OSL signal per readout in 200 successive readouts was also found to change with dose and energy of electron beam from 6 MeV (9% and 12% per readout at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively) to 20 MeV (9% and 16% at 2 and 10 Gy, respectively). The OSL sensitivity changed in the range from 2% to 6% with accumulated doses from 2 to 8 Gy and with electron energy from 6 to 20 MeV, but the sensitivity could be reset using an optical annealing treatment. Although negligible fading for postirradiation storage from 20 min to several months, acceptable precision and linearity in the desired range, and high reproducibility makes nanoDot dosimeters very attractive for the dosimetry of therapeutic electron beams, a note should be made for changes in sensitivity at doses beyond 2 Gy and electron beams energy dependence in reuse, short-term fading, and signal depletion on repeated readout. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5370337/ /pubmed/28405107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.202424 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Ponmalar, Y. Retna Manickam, Ravikumar Sathiyan, S. Ganesh, K. M. Arun, R. Godson, Henry Finlay Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title | Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title_full | Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title_fullStr | Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title_short | Response of Nanodot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters to Therapeutic Electron Beams |
title_sort | response of nanodot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters to therapeutic electron beams |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.202424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ponmalaryretna responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams AT manickamravikumar responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams AT sathiyans responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams AT ganeshkm responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams AT arunr responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams AT godsonhenryfinlay responseofnanodotopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterstotherapeuticelectronbeams |