Cargando…

An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cockayne, Sarah, Fairhurst, Caroline, Adamson, Joy, Hewitt, Catherine, Hull, Robin, Hicks, Kate, Keenan, Anne-Maree, Lamb, Sarah E., Green, Lorraine, McIntosh, Caroline, Menz, Hylton B., Redmond, Anthony C., Rodgers, Sara, Torgerson, David J., Vernon, Wesley, Watson, Judith, Knapp, Peter, Rick, Jo, Bower, Peter, Eldridge, Sandra, Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W., Graffy, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7
_version_ 1782518244126490624
author Cockayne, Sarah
Fairhurst, Caroline
Adamson, Joy
Hewitt, Catherine
Hull, Robin
Hicks, Kate
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Lamb, Sarah E.
Green, Lorraine
McIntosh, Caroline
Menz, Hylton B.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Rodgers, Sara
Torgerson, David J.
Vernon, Wesley
Watson, Judith
Knapp, Peter
Rick, Jo
Bower, Peter
Eldridge, Sandra
Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W.
Graffy, Jonathan
author_facet Cockayne, Sarah
Fairhurst, Caroline
Adamson, Joy
Hewitt, Catherine
Hull, Robin
Hicks, Kate
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Lamb, Sarah E.
Green, Lorraine
McIntosh, Caroline
Menz, Hylton B.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Rodgers, Sara
Torgerson, David J.
Vernon, Wesley
Watson, Judith
Knapp, Peter
Rick, Jo
Bower, Peter
Eldridge, Sandra
Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W.
Graffy, Jonathan
author_sort Cockayne, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. METHODS: A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention (REFORM) cohort randomised controlled trial. Routine National Health Service podiatry patients over the age of 65 were randomised to receive either the control patient information sheet (PIS) for the host trial or one of two optimised versions, a bespoke user-tested PIS or a template-developed PIS. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group who went on to be randomised to the host trial. RESULTS: Six thousand and nine hundred patients were randomised 1:1:1 into the embedded trial. A total of 193 (2.8%) went on to be randomised into the main REFORM trial (control n = 62, template-developed n = 68; bespoke user-tested n = 63). Information sheet allocation did not improve recruitment to the trial (odds ratios for the three pairwise comparisons: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77–1.56, p = 0.60); user-tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.45, p = 0.94); and user-tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65–1.31, p = 0.65)). CONCLUSIONS: This embedded methodology trial has demonstrated limited evidence as to the benefit of using optimised information materials on recruitment and retention rates in the REFORM study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ISRCTN68240461. Registered on 01 July 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53704662017-03-30 An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial Cockayne, Sarah Fairhurst, Caroline Adamson, Joy Hewitt, Catherine Hull, Robin Hicks, Kate Keenan, Anne-Maree Lamb, Sarah E. Green, Lorraine McIntosh, Caroline Menz, Hylton B. Redmond, Anthony C. Rodgers, Sara Torgerson, David J. Vernon, Wesley Watson, Judith Knapp, Peter Rick, Jo Bower, Peter Eldridge, Sandra Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W. Graffy, Jonathan Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. METHODS: A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention (REFORM) cohort randomised controlled trial. Routine National Health Service podiatry patients over the age of 65 were randomised to receive either the control patient information sheet (PIS) for the host trial or one of two optimised versions, a bespoke user-tested PIS or a template-developed PIS. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group who went on to be randomised to the host trial. RESULTS: Six thousand and nine hundred patients were randomised 1:1:1 into the embedded trial. A total of 193 (2.8%) went on to be randomised into the main REFORM trial (control n = 62, template-developed n = 68; bespoke user-tested n = 63). Information sheet allocation did not improve recruitment to the trial (odds ratios for the three pairwise comparisons: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77–1.56, p = 0.60); user-tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.45, p = 0.94); and user-tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65–1.31, p = 0.65)). CONCLUSIONS: This embedded methodology trial has demonstrated limited evidence as to the benefit of using optimised information materials on recruitment and retention rates in the REFORM study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ISRCTN68240461. Registered on 01 July 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5370466/ /pubmed/28351376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cockayne, Sarah
Fairhurst, Caroline
Adamson, Joy
Hewitt, Catherine
Hull, Robin
Hicks, Kate
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Lamb, Sarah E.
Green, Lorraine
McIntosh, Caroline
Menz, Hylton B.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Rodgers, Sara
Torgerson, David J.
Vernon, Wesley
Watson, Judith
Knapp, Peter
Rick, Jo
Bower, Peter
Eldridge, Sandra
Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W.
Graffy, Jonathan
An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title_full An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title_fullStr An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title_full_unstemmed An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title_short An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
title_sort optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cockaynesarah anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT fairhurstcaroline anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT adamsonjoy anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hewittcatherine anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hullrobin anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hickskate anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT keenanannemaree anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT lambsarahe anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT greenlorraine anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT mcintoshcaroline anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT menzhyltonb anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT redmondanthonyc anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT rodgerssara anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT torgersondavidj anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT vernonwesley anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT watsonjudith anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT knapppeter anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT rickjo anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT bowerpeter anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT eldridgesandra anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT madurasinghevichithraniew anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT graffyjonathan anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT cockaynesarah optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT fairhurstcaroline optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT adamsonjoy optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hewittcatherine optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hullrobin optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT hickskate optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT keenanannemaree optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT lambsarahe optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT greenlorraine optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT mcintoshcaroline optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT menzhyltonb optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT redmondanthonyc optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT rodgerssara optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT torgersondavidj optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT vernonwesley optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT watsonjudith optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT knapppeter optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT rickjo optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT bowerpeter optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT eldridgesandra optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT madurasinghevichithraniew optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial
AT graffyjonathan optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial