Cargando…
An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The curren...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7 |
_version_ | 1782518244126490624 |
---|---|
author | Cockayne, Sarah Fairhurst, Caroline Adamson, Joy Hewitt, Catherine Hull, Robin Hicks, Kate Keenan, Anne-Maree Lamb, Sarah E. Green, Lorraine McIntosh, Caroline Menz, Hylton B. Redmond, Anthony C. Rodgers, Sara Torgerson, David J. Vernon, Wesley Watson, Judith Knapp, Peter Rick, Jo Bower, Peter Eldridge, Sandra Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W. Graffy, Jonathan |
author_facet | Cockayne, Sarah Fairhurst, Caroline Adamson, Joy Hewitt, Catherine Hull, Robin Hicks, Kate Keenan, Anne-Maree Lamb, Sarah E. Green, Lorraine McIntosh, Caroline Menz, Hylton B. Redmond, Anthony C. Rodgers, Sara Torgerson, David J. Vernon, Wesley Watson, Judith Knapp, Peter Rick, Jo Bower, Peter Eldridge, Sandra Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W. Graffy, Jonathan |
author_sort | Cockayne, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. METHODS: A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention (REFORM) cohort randomised controlled trial. Routine National Health Service podiatry patients over the age of 65 were randomised to receive either the control patient information sheet (PIS) for the host trial or one of two optimised versions, a bespoke user-tested PIS or a template-developed PIS. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group who went on to be randomised to the host trial. RESULTS: Six thousand and nine hundred patients were randomised 1:1:1 into the embedded trial. A total of 193 (2.8%) went on to be randomised into the main REFORM trial (control n = 62, template-developed n = 68; bespoke user-tested n = 63). Information sheet allocation did not improve recruitment to the trial (odds ratios for the three pairwise comparisons: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77–1.56, p = 0.60); user-tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.45, p = 0.94); and user-tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65–1.31, p = 0.65)). CONCLUSIONS: This embedded methodology trial has demonstrated limited evidence as to the benefit of using optimised information materials on recruitment and retention rates in the REFORM study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ISRCTN68240461. Registered on 01 July 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5370466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53704662017-03-30 An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial Cockayne, Sarah Fairhurst, Caroline Adamson, Joy Hewitt, Catherine Hull, Robin Hicks, Kate Keenan, Anne-Maree Lamb, Sarah E. Green, Lorraine McIntosh, Caroline Menz, Hylton B. Redmond, Anthony C. Rodgers, Sara Torgerson, David J. Vernon, Wesley Watson, Judith Knapp, Peter Rick, Jo Bower, Peter Eldridge, Sandra Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W. Graffy, Jonathan Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. METHODS: A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention (REFORM) cohort randomised controlled trial. Routine National Health Service podiatry patients over the age of 65 were randomised to receive either the control patient information sheet (PIS) for the host trial or one of two optimised versions, a bespoke user-tested PIS or a template-developed PIS. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group who went on to be randomised to the host trial. RESULTS: Six thousand and nine hundred patients were randomised 1:1:1 into the embedded trial. A total of 193 (2.8%) went on to be randomised into the main REFORM trial (control n = 62, template-developed n = 68; bespoke user-tested n = 63). Information sheet allocation did not improve recruitment to the trial (odds ratios for the three pairwise comparisons: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77–1.56, p = 0.60); user-tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.45, p = 0.94); and user-tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65–1.31, p = 0.65)). CONCLUSIONS: This embedded methodology trial has demonstrated limited evidence as to the benefit of using optimised information materials on recruitment and retention rates in the REFORM study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ISRCTN68240461. Registered on 01 July 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5370466/ /pubmed/28351376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Cockayne, Sarah Fairhurst, Caroline Adamson, Joy Hewitt, Catherine Hull, Robin Hicks, Kate Keenan, Anne-Maree Lamb, Sarah E. Green, Lorraine McIntosh, Caroline Menz, Hylton B. Redmond, Anthony C. Rodgers, Sara Torgerson, David J. Vernon, Wesley Watson, Judith Knapp, Peter Rick, Jo Bower, Peter Eldridge, Sandra Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W. Graffy, Jonathan An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title | An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title_full | An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title_fullStr | An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title_full_unstemmed | An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title_short | An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
title_sort | optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cockaynesarah anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT fairhurstcaroline anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT adamsonjoy anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hewittcatherine anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hullrobin anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hickskate anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT keenanannemaree anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT lambsarahe anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT greenlorraine anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT mcintoshcaroline anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT menzhyltonb anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT redmondanthonyc anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT rodgerssara anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT torgersondavidj anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT vernonwesley anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT watsonjudith anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT knapppeter anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT rickjo anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT bowerpeter anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT eldridgesandra anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT madurasinghevichithraniew anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT graffyjonathan anoptimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT cockaynesarah optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT fairhurstcaroline optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT adamsonjoy optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hewittcatherine optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hullrobin optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT hickskate optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT keenanannemaree optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT lambsarahe optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT greenlorraine optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT mcintoshcaroline optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT menzhyltonb optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT redmondanthonyc optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT rodgerssara optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT torgersondavidj optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT vernonwesley optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT watsonjudith optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT knapppeter optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT rickjo optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT bowerpeter optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT eldridgesandra optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT madurasinghevichithraniew optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial AT graffyjonathan optimisedpatientinformationsheetdidnotsignificantlyincreaserecruitmentorretentioninafallspreventionstudyanembeddedrandomisedrecruitmenttrial |