Cargando…

Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,

OBJECTIVE: The research evaluated the perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services at one of Canada’s largest acute care teaching hospitals for the purpose of continuous quality improvement and investigation of relationships between variables that can impact user satisfactio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKeown, Sandra, Konrad, Shauna-Lee, McTavish, Jill, Boyce, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377674
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.201
_version_ 1782518261542289408
author McKeown, Sandra
Konrad, Shauna-Lee
McTavish, Jill
Boyce, Erin
author_facet McKeown, Sandra
Konrad, Shauna-Lee
McTavish, Jill
Boyce, Erin
author_sort McKeown, Sandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The research evaluated the perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services at one of Canada’s largest acute care teaching hospitals for the purpose of continuous quality improvement and investigation of relationships between variables that can impact user satisfaction. METHODS: An online survey was constructed using evidence-based methodologies. A systematic sample of staff and physicians requesting literature searches at London Health Sciences Centre were invited to participate in the study over a one-year period. Data analyses included descriptive statistics of closed-ended questions and coding of open-ended questions. RESULTS: A range of staff including clinicians, researchers, educators, leaders, and analysts submitted a total of 137 surveys, representing a response rate of 71%. Staff requested literature searches for the following “primary” purposes: research or publication (34%), teaching or training (20%), informing a policy or standard practice (16%), patient care (15%), and “other” purposes (15%). While the majority of staff (76%) submitted search requests using methods of written communication, including email and search request forms, staff using methods of verbal communication, including face-to-face and telephone conversations, were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request (p=0.004) and to rate the perceived quality of the search results as excellent (p=0.005). In most cases, librarians followed up with staff to clarify the details of their search requests (72%), and these staff were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the limitations of written communication in the context of librarian-mediated literature searching and suggest a multifaceted approach to quality improvement efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medical Library Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53706022017-04-04 Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services, McKeown, Sandra Konrad, Shauna-Lee McTavish, Jill Boyce, Erin J Med Libr Assoc Surveys and Studies OBJECTIVE: The research evaluated the perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services at one of Canada’s largest acute care teaching hospitals for the purpose of continuous quality improvement and investigation of relationships between variables that can impact user satisfaction. METHODS: An online survey was constructed using evidence-based methodologies. A systematic sample of staff and physicians requesting literature searches at London Health Sciences Centre were invited to participate in the study over a one-year period. Data analyses included descriptive statistics of closed-ended questions and coding of open-ended questions. RESULTS: A range of staff including clinicians, researchers, educators, leaders, and analysts submitted a total of 137 surveys, representing a response rate of 71%. Staff requested literature searches for the following “primary” purposes: research or publication (34%), teaching or training (20%), informing a policy or standard practice (16%), patient care (15%), and “other” purposes (15%). While the majority of staff (76%) submitted search requests using methods of written communication, including email and search request forms, staff using methods of verbal communication, including face-to-face and telephone conversations, were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request (p=0.004) and to rate the perceived quality of the search results as excellent (p=0.005). In most cases, librarians followed up with staff to clarify the details of their search requests (72%), and these staff were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the limitations of written communication in the context of librarian-mediated literature searching and suggest a multifaceted approach to quality improvement efforts. Medical Library Association 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5370602/ /pubmed/28377674 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.201 Text en Copyright: © 2017, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surveys and Studies
McKeown, Sandra
Konrad, Shauna-Lee
McTavish, Jill
Boyce, Erin
Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title_full Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title_fullStr Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title_short Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
title_sort evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services,
topic Surveys and Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377674
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.201
work_keys_str_mv AT mckeownsandra evaluationofhospitalstaffsperceivedqualityoflibrarianmediatedliteraturesearchingservices
AT konradshaunalee evaluationofhospitalstaffsperceivedqualityoflibrarianmediatedliteraturesearchingservices
AT mctavishjill evaluationofhospitalstaffsperceivedqualityoflibrarianmediatedliteraturesearchingservices
AT boyceerin evaluationofhospitalstaffsperceivedqualityoflibrarianmediatedliteraturesearchingservices