Increasing number of small hole diameter microfracture compared with traditional microfracture in same size cartilage defects and effect of HA based aselluler scaffold. An animal study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is small hole microfracure method comparing with traditional microfracture method and investigation of effect of HA based acellular matrix scaffold on microfracture area. MATERIALS-METHODS: 21 Twenty-one New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vitro portion of this study, bilateral knee joint from the same rabbit were same technic. An articular cartilage defect was established in the femoral trochlear groove about 5 mm. Control group was established alone microfracture (MF). 6 groups were formed in this study and each group has 3 rabbits and their six knees. In 3 groups were applied different number of small diameter hole microfracture (4,5,6 small holes microfracture respectively)and the other 3 groups were applied different number of small diameter hole microfracture (4,5,6 small holes micro fracture respectively added HA based acellular matrix scaffold in the same size ostechondral lesion. The regenerated tissues were harvested for gross morphology, histology at 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Cartilage were regenerated, maintaining a constant thickness of cartilage. MF group has worse Wakitani scores than 6 small diameter holes mıcrofracture groups(group 6 and group 7) in either parameter of the score. (p=0,043, p=0,016) Matrix addition did not contribute to healing. (p=1,000) CONCLUSIONS: Increasing number of the small diameter holes microfracture (minimum %15 of defect size) improves cartilage repair compared with traditional MF in the same size ostechondral lesion. Also small diameter holes microfracture combined with HA-based AM implantation didn’t result in improved quality of the regenerated cartilage tissue.