Cargando…

Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)

Individuals with late-onset essential tremor (ET) (e.g., older adults) seem to have an increased prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia, and a higher risk of incident dementia. It is well-known that education has a protective role against dementia in individuals without a pre-existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benito-León, Julián, Contador, Israel, Louis, Elan D., Cosentino, Stephanie, Bermejo-Pareja, Félix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004607
_version_ 1782518304724746240
author Benito-León, Julián
Contador, Israel
Louis, Elan D.
Cosentino, Stephanie
Bermejo-Pareja, Félix
author_facet Benito-León, Julián
Contador, Israel
Louis, Elan D.
Cosentino, Stephanie
Bermejo-Pareja, Félix
author_sort Benito-León, Julián
collection PubMed
description Individuals with late-onset essential tremor (ET) (e.g., older adults) seem to have an increased prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia, and a higher risk of incident dementia. It is well-known that education has a protective role against dementia in individuals without a pre-existing neurologic disorder, but evidence regarding the maintenance of this effect during the premotor and motor phases of ET is unknown. Our aim was to determine the influence of education on the risk of dementia in a population-based cohort of ET patients and controls. In a prospective study (Neurological Disorders in Central Spain), participants ≥65 years old were evaluated twice: at baseline (1994–1995) and at follow-up (1997–1998). There were 3 groups: premotor (i.e., participants first diagnosed with incident ET at follow-up), prevalent ET (i.e., participants diagnosed with ET at baseline and at follow-up), and controls. Participants were stratified into lower education (≤primary studies) versus higher education (≥secondary studies) categories. Dementia risk was estimated using Cox proportional-hazards models (higher education control group = reference category). Among the participants, 3878 had a mean duration of follow-up of 3.2 years. Eight (16.7%) of 48 lower education premotor ET patients developed incident dementia versus 1 (3.3%) of 30 higher education premotor ET patients, 9 (7.1%) of 126 lower education prevalent ET patients, 7 (8.8%) of 80 higher education prevalent ET patients, and 92 (4.9%) of 1892 lower education controls (P < 0.001). In comparison to the higher education controls, the adjusted hazard ratios for incident dementia were 5.84 (lower education premotor ET, P < 0.001); 1.36 (higher education premotor ET, P = 0.76); 2.13 (lower education prevalent ET, P = 0.04); 2.79 (higher education prevalent ET, P = 0.01); and 1.66 (lower education controls, P = 0.01). Our results suggest that a higher educational attainment may ameliorate the risk of incident dementia during the premotor phase of ET, but not in the motor phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5370823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53708232017-03-31 Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES) Benito-León, Julián Contador, Israel Louis, Elan D. Cosentino, Stephanie Bermejo-Pareja, Félix Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 Individuals with late-onset essential tremor (ET) (e.g., older adults) seem to have an increased prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia, and a higher risk of incident dementia. It is well-known that education has a protective role against dementia in individuals without a pre-existing neurologic disorder, but evidence regarding the maintenance of this effect during the premotor and motor phases of ET is unknown. Our aim was to determine the influence of education on the risk of dementia in a population-based cohort of ET patients and controls. In a prospective study (Neurological Disorders in Central Spain), participants ≥65 years old were evaluated twice: at baseline (1994–1995) and at follow-up (1997–1998). There were 3 groups: premotor (i.e., participants first diagnosed with incident ET at follow-up), prevalent ET (i.e., participants diagnosed with ET at baseline and at follow-up), and controls. Participants were stratified into lower education (≤primary studies) versus higher education (≥secondary studies) categories. Dementia risk was estimated using Cox proportional-hazards models (higher education control group = reference category). Among the participants, 3878 had a mean duration of follow-up of 3.2 years. Eight (16.7%) of 48 lower education premotor ET patients developed incident dementia versus 1 (3.3%) of 30 higher education premotor ET patients, 9 (7.1%) of 126 lower education prevalent ET patients, 7 (8.8%) of 80 higher education prevalent ET patients, and 92 (4.9%) of 1892 lower education controls (P < 0.001). In comparison to the higher education controls, the adjusted hazard ratios for incident dementia were 5.84 (lower education premotor ET, P < 0.001); 1.36 (higher education premotor ET, P = 0.76); 2.13 (lower education prevalent ET, P = 0.04); 2.79 (higher education prevalent ET, P = 0.01); and 1.66 (lower education controls, P = 0.01). Our results suggest that a higher educational attainment may ameliorate the risk of incident dementia during the premotor phase of ET, but not in the motor phase. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5370823/ /pubmed/27537597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004607 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Benito-León, Julián
Contador, Israel
Louis, Elan D.
Cosentino, Stephanie
Bermejo-Pareja, Félix
Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title_full Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title_fullStr Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title_full_unstemmed Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title_short Education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (NEDICES)
title_sort education and risk of incident dementia during the premotor and motor phases of essential tremor (nedices)
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004607
work_keys_str_mv AT benitoleonjulian educationandriskofincidentdementiaduringthepremotorandmotorphasesofessentialtremornedices
AT contadorisrael educationandriskofincidentdementiaduringthepremotorandmotorphasesofessentialtremornedices
AT louiseland educationandriskofincidentdementiaduringthepremotorandmotorphasesofessentialtremornedices
AT cosentinostephanie educationandriskofincidentdementiaduringthepremotorandmotorphasesofessentialtremornedices
AT bermejoparejafelix educationandriskofincidentdementiaduringthepremotorandmotorphasesofessentialtremornedices