Cargando…

Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management

BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for posto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skraastad, Erlend, Ræder, Johan, Dahl, Vegard, Bjertnæs, Lars J., Kuklin, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0
_version_ 1782518389273526272
author Skraastad, Erlend
Ræder, Johan
Dahl, Vegard
Bjertnæs, Lars J.
Kuklin, Vladimir
author_facet Skraastad, Erlend
Ræder, Johan
Dahl, Vegard
Bjertnæs, Lars J.
Kuklin, Vladimir
author_sort Skraastad, Erlend
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for postoperative care and a call-out algorithm for need of extra help. The aim of this investigation was to validate the score. METHODS: After suggesting a prototype score from a pilot study in 182 postoperative patients, we performed a Delphi process by using international experts to create consensus on the final score contents and called the revised tool the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS). Then, we performed a prospective observational study with the ESS throughout the first 24 h postoperatively in 207 surgical in-patients. We compared ESS with Modified Early Warning Systems (MEWS), and postoperative journal information. We subsequently validated ESS by addressing recognized quality criteria for measurement of health status questionnaires. RESULTS: A call-out value of ESS ≥10 correlated with MEWS > 0 values and journal information about postoperative concerns with a sensitivity of 94% and 92%, respectively. All serious safety issues were identified with the ESS ≥ 10, and a higher number of quality issues were identified than with routine care or MEWS. We obtained positive ratings for six out of seven tested criteria of questionnaire quality; one criterion had an indeterminate rating. CONCLUSION: ESS fulfils suggested criteria for score quality validation and reflects the patient’s postoperative status adequately and with high sensitivity. Further clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of ESS as a simple tool for assessment of the postoperative safety and quality of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5371277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53712772017-03-30 Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management Skraastad, Erlend Ræder, Johan Dahl, Vegard Bjertnæs, Lars J. Kuklin, Vladimir BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for postoperative care and a call-out algorithm for need of extra help. The aim of this investigation was to validate the score. METHODS: After suggesting a prototype score from a pilot study in 182 postoperative patients, we performed a Delphi process by using international experts to create consensus on the final score contents and called the revised tool the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS). Then, we performed a prospective observational study with the ESS throughout the first 24 h postoperatively in 207 surgical in-patients. We compared ESS with Modified Early Warning Systems (MEWS), and postoperative journal information. We subsequently validated ESS by addressing recognized quality criteria for measurement of health status questionnaires. RESULTS: A call-out value of ESS ≥10 correlated with MEWS > 0 values and journal information about postoperative concerns with a sensitivity of 94% and 92%, respectively. All serious safety issues were identified with the ESS ≥ 10, and a higher number of quality issues were identified than with routine care or MEWS. We obtained positive ratings for six out of seven tested criteria of questionnaire quality; one criterion had an indeterminate rating. CONCLUSION: ESS fulfils suggested criteria for score quality validation and reflects the patient’s postoperative status adequately and with high sensitivity. Further clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of ESS as a simple tool for assessment of the postoperative safety and quality of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5371277/ /pubmed/28351349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skraastad, Erlend
Ræder, Johan
Dahl, Vegard
Bjertnæs, Lars J.
Kuklin, Vladimir
Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title_full Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title_short Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
title_sort development and validation of the efficacy safety score (ess), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0
work_keys_str_mv AT skraastaderlend developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement
AT ræderjohan developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement
AT dahlvegard developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement
AT bjertnæslarsj developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement
AT kuklinvladimir developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement