Cargando…
Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management
BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for posto...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0 |
_version_ | 1782518389273526272 |
---|---|
author | Skraastad, Erlend Ræder, Johan Dahl, Vegard Bjertnæs, Lars J. Kuklin, Vladimir |
author_facet | Skraastad, Erlend Ræder, Johan Dahl, Vegard Bjertnæs, Lars J. Kuklin, Vladimir |
author_sort | Skraastad, Erlend |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for postoperative care and a call-out algorithm for need of extra help. The aim of this investigation was to validate the score. METHODS: After suggesting a prototype score from a pilot study in 182 postoperative patients, we performed a Delphi process by using international experts to create consensus on the final score contents and called the revised tool the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS). Then, we performed a prospective observational study with the ESS throughout the first 24 h postoperatively in 207 surgical in-patients. We compared ESS with Modified Early Warning Systems (MEWS), and postoperative journal information. We subsequently validated ESS by addressing recognized quality criteria for measurement of health status questionnaires. RESULTS: A call-out value of ESS ≥10 correlated with MEWS > 0 values and journal information about postoperative concerns with a sensitivity of 94% and 92%, respectively. All serious safety issues were identified with the ESS ≥ 10, and a higher number of quality issues were identified than with routine care or MEWS. We obtained positive ratings for six out of seven tested criteria of questionnaire quality; one criterion had an indeterminate rating. CONCLUSION: ESS fulfils suggested criteria for score quality validation and reflects the patient’s postoperative status adequately and with high sensitivity. Further clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of ESS as a simple tool for assessment of the postoperative safety and quality of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5371277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53712772017-03-30 Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management Skraastad, Erlend Ræder, Johan Dahl, Vegard Bjertnæs, Lars J. Kuklin, Vladimir BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that postoperative monitoring of general safety and quality issues, including pain treatment, after discharge from recovery is often non-systematic and inadequate. We suggest a new score with assessment of key recovery parameters, as a supportive tool for postoperative care and a call-out algorithm for need of extra help. The aim of this investigation was to validate the score. METHODS: After suggesting a prototype score from a pilot study in 182 postoperative patients, we performed a Delphi process by using international experts to create consensus on the final score contents and called the revised tool the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS). Then, we performed a prospective observational study with the ESS throughout the first 24 h postoperatively in 207 surgical in-patients. We compared ESS with Modified Early Warning Systems (MEWS), and postoperative journal information. We subsequently validated ESS by addressing recognized quality criteria for measurement of health status questionnaires. RESULTS: A call-out value of ESS ≥10 correlated with MEWS > 0 values and journal information about postoperative concerns with a sensitivity of 94% and 92%, respectively. All serious safety issues were identified with the ESS ≥ 10, and a higher number of quality issues were identified than with routine care or MEWS. We obtained positive ratings for six out of seven tested criteria of questionnaire quality; one criterion had an indeterminate rating. CONCLUSION: ESS fulfils suggested criteria for score quality validation and reflects the patient’s postoperative status adequately and with high sensitivity. Further clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of ESS as a simple tool for assessment of the postoperative safety and quality of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5371277/ /pubmed/28351349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Skraastad, Erlend Ræder, Johan Dahl, Vegard Bjertnæs, Lars J. Kuklin, Vladimir Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title | Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title_full | Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title_short | Development and validation of the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
title_sort | development and validation of the efficacy safety score (ess), a novel tool for postoperative patient management |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28351349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0344-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skraastaderlend developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement AT ræderjohan developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement AT dahlvegard developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement AT bjertnæslarsj developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement AT kuklinvladimir developmentandvalidationoftheefficacysafetyscoreessanoveltoolforpostoperativepatientmanagement |