Cargando…

MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?

BACKGROUND: Device-associated infections due to biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been recently associated with the failure of antibiotic treatment and decolonization measures. The goal of our study was to evaluate the extent to which the formation of biofilms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Frank, Blessing, Brigitte, Tacconelli, Evelina, Mutters, Nico T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28360994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0192-1
_version_ 1782518403481731072
author Günther, Frank
Blessing, Brigitte
Tacconelli, Evelina
Mutters, Nico T.
author_facet Günther, Frank
Blessing, Brigitte
Tacconelli, Evelina
Mutters, Nico T.
author_sort Günther, Frank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Device-associated infections due to biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been recently associated with the failure of antibiotic treatment and decolonization measures. The goal of our study was to evaluate the extent to which the formation of biofilms influenced the efficacy of topical decolonization agents or disinfectants such as mupirocin (MUP), octenidine (OCT), chlorhexidine (CHG), polyhexanide (POL), and chloroxylenol (CLO). METHODS: Bacterial killing in biofilms by the disinfectants and MUP was determined as the reduction [%] in metabolic activity determined by a biofilm viability assay that uses kinetic analysis of metabolic activity. The test substances were diluted in water with standardized hardness (WSH) at 25 °C at the standard concentration as well as half the standard concentration to demonstrate the dilution effects in a practical setting. The tested concentrations were: CHG 1%, 2%; OCT 0.1%, 0.05%; PH 0.04%, 0.02%; and CLO 0.12%, 0.24%. A test organism suspension, 1 mL containing ~1 × 10(9) bacterial cells/mL, and 1 mL of sterile WSH were mixed and incubated for six different exposure times (15 s, 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 min) after the test substance was added. Additionally, the bactericidal effects of all substances were tested on planktonic bacteria and measured as the log10 reduction. RESULTS: The disinfectants OCT and CHG showed good efficacy in inhibiting MRSA in biofilms with reduction rates of 94 ± 1% and 91 ± 1%, respectively. POL, on the other hand, had a maximum efficacy of only 81 ± 7%. Compared to the tested disinfectants, MUP showed a significantly lower efficacy with <20% inhibition (p < .05). Bactericidal effects were the greatest for CHG (log10 reduction of 9.0), followed by OCT (7.7), POL (5.1), and CLO (6.8). MUP, however, showed a very low bactericidal effect of only 2.1. Even when the exposure time was increased to 24 h, 2% MUP did not show sufficient bactericidal effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that OCT and CHG are effective components for disinfection of MRSA-biofilms. On the other hand, exposure to MUP at the standard concentrations in topical preparations did not effectively inhibit MRSA-biofilms and also did not show adequate bactericidal effects. Combining an MUP-based decolonization regimen with a disinfectant such as OCT or CHG could decrease decolonization failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5371339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53713392017-03-30 MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link? Günther, Frank Blessing, Brigitte Tacconelli, Evelina Mutters, Nico T. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Device-associated infections due to biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been recently associated with the failure of antibiotic treatment and decolonization measures. The goal of our study was to evaluate the extent to which the formation of biofilms influenced the efficacy of topical decolonization agents or disinfectants such as mupirocin (MUP), octenidine (OCT), chlorhexidine (CHG), polyhexanide (POL), and chloroxylenol (CLO). METHODS: Bacterial killing in biofilms by the disinfectants and MUP was determined as the reduction [%] in metabolic activity determined by a biofilm viability assay that uses kinetic analysis of metabolic activity. The test substances were diluted in water with standardized hardness (WSH) at 25 °C at the standard concentration as well as half the standard concentration to demonstrate the dilution effects in a practical setting. The tested concentrations were: CHG 1%, 2%; OCT 0.1%, 0.05%; PH 0.04%, 0.02%; and CLO 0.12%, 0.24%. A test organism suspension, 1 mL containing ~1 × 10(9) bacterial cells/mL, and 1 mL of sterile WSH were mixed and incubated for six different exposure times (15 s, 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 min) after the test substance was added. Additionally, the bactericidal effects of all substances were tested on planktonic bacteria and measured as the log10 reduction. RESULTS: The disinfectants OCT and CHG showed good efficacy in inhibiting MRSA in biofilms with reduction rates of 94 ± 1% and 91 ± 1%, respectively. POL, on the other hand, had a maximum efficacy of only 81 ± 7%. Compared to the tested disinfectants, MUP showed a significantly lower efficacy with <20% inhibition (p < .05). Bactericidal effects were the greatest for CHG (log10 reduction of 9.0), followed by OCT (7.7), POL (5.1), and CLO (6.8). MUP, however, showed a very low bactericidal effect of only 2.1. Even when the exposure time was increased to 24 h, 2% MUP did not show sufficient bactericidal effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that OCT and CHG are effective components for disinfection of MRSA-biofilms. On the other hand, exposure to MUP at the standard concentrations in topical preparations did not effectively inhibit MRSA-biofilms and also did not show adequate bactericidal effects. Combining an MUP-based decolonization regimen with a disinfectant such as OCT or CHG could decrease decolonization failure. BioMed Central 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5371339/ /pubmed/28360994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0192-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Günther, Frank
Blessing, Brigitte
Tacconelli, Evelina
Mutters, Nico T.
MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title_full MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title_fullStr MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title_full_unstemmed MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title_short MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
title_sort mrsa decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28360994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0192-1
work_keys_str_mv AT guntherfrank mrsadecolonizationfailurearebiofilmsthemissinglink
AT blessingbrigitte mrsadecolonizationfailurearebiofilmsthemissinglink
AT tacconellievelina mrsadecolonizationfailurearebiofilmsthemissinglink
AT muttersnicot mrsadecolonizationfailurearebiofilmsthemissinglink