Cargando…

Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution

We measured the distribution of sugar solution within groups of caged honey bees (Apis mellifera) under standard in vitro laboratory conditions using (14)C polyethylene glycol as a radioactive marker to analyze ingestion by individual bees after group feeding. We studied the impact of different expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodschneider, Robert, Libor, Anika, Kupelwieser, Vera, Crailsheim, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174684
_version_ 1782518407679180800
author Brodschneider, Robert
Libor, Anika
Kupelwieser, Vera
Crailsheim, Karl
author_facet Brodschneider, Robert
Libor, Anika
Kupelwieser, Vera
Crailsheim, Karl
author_sort Brodschneider, Robert
collection PubMed
description We measured the distribution of sugar solution within groups of caged honey bees (Apis mellifera) under standard in vitro laboratory conditions using (14)C polyethylene glycol as a radioactive marker to analyze ingestion by individual bees after group feeding. We studied the impact of different experimental setups by varying the number of bees, age of bees, origin of bees, duration of experiment, the amount of available diet, and the influence of the neurotoxic pesticide imidacloprid in the diet on the feeding and food sharing behavior (trophallaxis). Sugar solution was non-uniformly distributed in bees in 36 out of 135 cages. As a measure of the extent to which the sugar diet was equally distributed between caged bees, we calculated the (inner 80%) intake ratio by dividing the intake of the 90(th) percentile bee by the intake of the 10(th) percentile bee. This intake ratio ranged from 1.3 to 94.8 in 133 individual cages, further supporting a non-uniform distribution of food among caged bees. We can expect a cage with 10 or 30 bees containing one bee that ingests, on average, the 8.8-fold of the bee in the same cage ingesting the smallest quantity of food. Inner 80% intake ratios were lower in experiments with a permanent or chronic offering of labelled sugar solution compared to temporary or acute feedings. After pooling the data of replicates to achieve a higher statistical power we compared different experimental setups. We found that uniform food distribution is best approached with 10 newly emerged bees per cage, which originate from a brood comb from a single colony. We also investigated the trophallaxis between caged honey bees which originally consumed the diet and newly added bees. Color marked bees were starved and added to the cages in a ratio of 10:5 or 20:20 after the initial set of bees consumed all the labelled sugar solution. The distribution of the labelled sugar solution by trophallaxis within 48 hours to added bees was 25% (10:5) or 45% (20:20) of the initial sugar solution. Imidacloprid at its median lethal dose (LD(50)) in the sugar solution reduced this post-feeding food transmission to 27% (20:20). Our results show that differences in food intake exist within caged bees that may lead to differential exposure that can influence the interpretation of toxicity tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5371368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53713682017-04-07 Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution Brodschneider, Robert Libor, Anika Kupelwieser, Vera Crailsheim, Karl PLoS One Research Article We measured the distribution of sugar solution within groups of caged honey bees (Apis mellifera) under standard in vitro laboratory conditions using (14)C polyethylene glycol as a radioactive marker to analyze ingestion by individual bees after group feeding. We studied the impact of different experimental setups by varying the number of bees, age of bees, origin of bees, duration of experiment, the amount of available diet, and the influence of the neurotoxic pesticide imidacloprid in the diet on the feeding and food sharing behavior (trophallaxis). Sugar solution was non-uniformly distributed in bees in 36 out of 135 cages. As a measure of the extent to which the sugar diet was equally distributed between caged bees, we calculated the (inner 80%) intake ratio by dividing the intake of the 90(th) percentile bee by the intake of the 10(th) percentile bee. This intake ratio ranged from 1.3 to 94.8 in 133 individual cages, further supporting a non-uniform distribution of food among caged bees. We can expect a cage with 10 or 30 bees containing one bee that ingests, on average, the 8.8-fold of the bee in the same cage ingesting the smallest quantity of food. Inner 80% intake ratios were lower in experiments with a permanent or chronic offering of labelled sugar solution compared to temporary or acute feedings. After pooling the data of replicates to achieve a higher statistical power we compared different experimental setups. We found that uniform food distribution is best approached with 10 newly emerged bees per cage, which originate from a brood comb from a single colony. We also investigated the trophallaxis between caged honey bees which originally consumed the diet and newly added bees. Color marked bees were starved and added to the cages in a ratio of 10:5 or 20:20 after the initial set of bees consumed all the labelled sugar solution. The distribution of the labelled sugar solution by trophallaxis within 48 hours to added bees was 25% (10:5) or 45% (20:20) of the initial sugar solution. Imidacloprid at its median lethal dose (LD(50)) in the sugar solution reduced this post-feeding food transmission to 27% (20:20). Our results show that differences in food intake exist within caged bees that may lead to differential exposure that can influence the interpretation of toxicity tests. Public Library of Science 2017-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5371368/ /pubmed/28355267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174684 Text en © 2017 Brodschneider et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brodschneider, Robert
Libor, Anika
Kupelwieser, Vera
Crailsheim, Karl
Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title_full Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title_fullStr Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title_full_unstemmed Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title_short Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
title_sort food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174684
work_keys_str_mv AT brodschneiderrobert foodconsumptionandfoodexchangeofcagedhoneybeesusingaradioactivelabelledsugarsolution
AT liboranika foodconsumptionandfoodexchangeofcagedhoneybeesusingaradioactivelabelledsugarsolution
AT kupelwieservera foodconsumptionandfoodexchangeofcagedhoneybeesusingaradioactivelabelledsugarsolution
AT crailsheimkarl foodconsumptionandfoodexchangeofcagedhoneybeesusingaradioactivelabelledsugarsolution