Cargando…

How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting

The cytotoxicity of the venom of 25 species of Old World elapid snake was tested and compared with the morphological and behavioural adaptations of hooding and spitting. We determined that, contrary to previous assumptions, the venoms of spitting species are not consistently more cytotoxic than thos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagides, Nadya, Jackson, Timothy N.W., Ikonomopoulou, Maria P., Arbuckle, Kevin, Pretzler, Rudolf, Yang, Daryl C., Ali, Syed A., Koludarov, Ivan, Dobson, James, Sanker, Brittany, Asselin, Angelique, Santana, Renan C., Hendrikx, Iwan, van der Ploeg, Harold, Tai-A-Pin, Jeremie, van den Bergh, Romilly, Kerkkamp, Harald M.I., Vonk, Freek J., Naude, Arno, Strydom, Morné A., Jacobsz, Louis, Dunstan, Nathan, Jaeger, Marc, Hodgson, Wayne C., Miles, John, Fry, Bryan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9030103
_version_ 1782518507121934336
author Panagides, Nadya
Jackson, Timothy N.W.
Ikonomopoulou, Maria P.
Arbuckle, Kevin
Pretzler, Rudolf
Yang, Daryl C.
Ali, Syed A.
Koludarov, Ivan
Dobson, James
Sanker, Brittany
Asselin, Angelique
Santana, Renan C.
Hendrikx, Iwan
van der Ploeg, Harold
Tai-A-Pin, Jeremie
van den Bergh, Romilly
Kerkkamp, Harald M.I.
Vonk, Freek J.
Naude, Arno
Strydom, Morné A.
Jacobsz, Louis
Dunstan, Nathan
Jaeger, Marc
Hodgson, Wayne C.
Miles, John
Fry, Bryan G.
author_facet Panagides, Nadya
Jackson, Timothy N.W.
Ikonomopoulou, Maria P.
Arbuckle, Kevin
Pretzler, Rudolf
Yang, Daryl C.
Ali, Syed A.
Koludarov, Ivan
Dobson, James
Sanker, Brittany
Asselin, Angelique
Santana, Renan C.
Hendrikx, Iwan
van der Ploeg, Harold
Tai-A-Pin, Jeremie
van den Bergh, Romilly
Kerkkamp, Harald M.I.
Vonk, Freek J.
Naude, Arno
Strydom, Morné A.
Jacobsz, Louis
Dunstan, Nathan
Jaeger, Marc
Hodgson, Wayne C.
Miles, John
Fry, Bryan G.
author_sort Panagides, Nadya
collection PubMed
description The cytotoxicity of the venom of 25 species of Old World elapid snake was tested and compared with the morphological and behavioural adaptations of hooding and spitting. We determined that, contrary to previous assumptions, the venoms of spitting species are not consistently more cytotoxic than those of closely related non-spitting species. While this correlation between spitting and non-spitting was found among African cobras, it was not present among Asian cobras. On the other hand, a consistent positive correlation was observed between cytotoxicity and utilisation of the defensive hooding display that cobras are famous for. Hooding and spitting are widely regarded as defensive adaptations, but it has hitherto been uncertain whether cytotoxicity serves a defensive purpose or is somehow useful in prey subjugation. The results of this study suggest that cytotoxicity evolved primarily as a defensive innovation and that it has co-evolved twice alongside hooding behavior: once in the Hemachatus + Naja and again independently in the king cobras (Ophiophagus). There was a significant increase of cytotoxicity in the Asian Naja linked to the evolution of bold aposematic hood markings, reinforcing the link between hooding and the evolution of defensive cytotoxic venoms. In parallel, lineages with increased cytotoxicity but lacking bold hood patterns evolved aposematic markers in the form of high contrast body banding. The results also indicate that, secondary to the evolution of venom rich in cytotoxins, spitting has evolved three times independently: once within the African Naja, once within the Asian Naja, and once in the Hemachatus genus. The evolution of cytotoxic venom thus appears to facilitate the evolution of defensive spitting behaviour. In contrast, a secondary loss of cytotoxicity and reduction of the hood occurred in the water cobra Naja annulata, which possesses streamlined neurotoxic venom similar to that of other aquatic elapid snakes (e.g., hydrophiine sea snakes). The results of this study make an important contribution to our growing understanding of the selection pressures shaping the evolution of snake venom and its constituent toxins. The data also aid in elucidating the relationship between these selection pressures and the medical impact of human snakebite in the developing world, as cytotoxic cobras cause considerable morbidity including loss-of-function injuries that result in economic and social burdens in the tropics of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5371858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53718582017-04-10 How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting Panagides, Nadya Jackson, Timothy N.W. Ikonomopoulou, Maria P. Arbuckle, Kevin Pretzler, Rudolf Yang, Daryl C. Ali, Syed A. Koludarov, Ivan Dobson, James Sanker, Brittany Asselin, Angelique Santana, Renan C. Hendrikx, Iwan van der Ploeg, Harold Tai-A-Pin, Jeremie van den Bergh, Romilly Kerkkamp, Harald M.I. Vonk, Freek J. Naude, Arno Strydom, Morné A. Jacobsz, Louis Dunstan, Nathan Jaeger, Marc Hodgson, Wayne C. Miles, John Fry, Bryan G. Toxins (Basel) Article The cytotoxicity of the venom of 25 species of Old World elapid snake was tested and compared with the morphological and behavioural adaptations of hooding and spitting. We determined that, contrary to previous assumptions, the venoms of spitting species are not consistently more cytotoxic than those of closely related non-spitting species. While this correlation between spitting and non-spitting was found among African cobras, it was not present among Asian cobras. On the other hand, a consistent positive correlation was observed between cytotoxicity and utilisation of the defensive hooding display that cobras are famous for. Hooding and spitting are widely regarded as defensive adaptations, but it has hitherto been uncertain whether cytotoxicity serves a defensive purpose or is somehow useful in prey subjugation. The results of this study suggest that cytotoxicity evolved primarily as a defensive innovation and that it has co-evolved twice alongside hooding behavior: once in the Hemachatus + Naja and again independently in the king cobras (Ophiophagus). There was a significant increase of cytotoxicity in the Asian Naja linked to the evolution of bold aposematic hood markings, reinforcing the link between hooding and the evolution of defensive cytotoxic venoms. In parallel, lineages with increased cytotoxicity but lacking bold hood patterns evolved aposematic markers in the form of high contrast body banding. The results also indicate that, secondary to the evolution of venom rich in cytotoxins, spitting has evolved three times independently: once within the African Naja, once within the Asian Naja, and once in the Hemachatus genus. The evolution of cytotoxic venom thus appears to facilitate the evolution of defensive spitting behaviour. In contrast, a secondary loss of cytotoxicity and reduction of the hood occurred in the water cobra Naja annulata, which possesses streamlined neurotoxic venom similar to that of other aquatic elapid snakes (e.g., hydrophiine sea snakes). The results of this study make an important contribution to our growing understanding of the selection pressures shaping the evolution of snake venom and its constituent toxins. The data also aid in elucidating the relationship between these selection pressures and the medical impact of human snakebite in the developing world, as cytotoxic cobras cause considerable morbidity including loss-of-function injuries that result in economic and social burdens in the tropics of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. MDPI 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5371858/ /pubmed/28335411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9030103 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panagides, Nadya
Jackson, Timothy N.W.
Ikonomopoulou, Maria P.
Arbuckle, Kevin
Pretzler, Rudolf
Yang, Daryl C.
Ali, Syed A.
Koludarov, Ivan
Dobson, James
Sanker, Brittany
Asselin, Angelique
Santana, Renan C.
Hendrikx, Iwan
van der Ploeg, Harold
Tai-A-Pin, Jeremie
van den Bergh, Romilly
Kerkkamp, Harald M.I.
Vonk, Freek J.
Naude, Arno
Strydom, Morné A.
Jacobsz, Louis
Dunstan, Nathan
Jaeger, Marc
Hodgson, Wayne C.
Miles, John
Fry, Bryan G.
How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title_full How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title_fullStr How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title_full_unstemmed How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title_short How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting
title_sort how the cobra got its flesh-eating venom: cytotoxicity as a defensive innovation and its co-evolution with hooding, aposematic marking, and spitting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9030103
work_keys_str_mv AT panagidesnadya howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT jacksontimothynw howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT ikonomopouloumariap howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT arbucklekevin howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT pretzlerrudolf howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT yangdarylc howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT alisyeda howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT koludarovivan howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT dobsonjames howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT sankerbrittany howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT asselinangelique howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT santanarenanc howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT hendrikxiwan howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT vanderploegharold howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT taiapinjeremie howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT vandenberghromilly howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT kerkkampharaldmi howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT vonkfreekj howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT naudearno howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT strydommornea howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT jacobszlouis howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT dunstannathan howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT jaegermarc howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT hodgsonwaynec howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT milesjohn howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting
AT frybryang howthecobragotitsflesheatingvenomcytotoxicityasadefensiveinnovationanditscoevolutionwithhoodingaposematicmarkingandspitting