Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289 |
_version_ | 1782518542289076224 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Qiong Chen, Zhao-Hong Wang, Shun-Bin Chen, Xiao-Dong |
author_facet | Jiang, Qiong Chen, Zhao-Hong Wang, Shun-Bin Chen, Xiao-Dong |
author_sort | Jiang, Qiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect evidence of wound dressings in the management of PTB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the wound-healing effect of a wound dressing in the management of PTB. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register and CINAHL. A comprehensive search strategy is developed to retrieve articles reporting potentially eligible RCTs. Besides, we will contact the experts in the field and review the conference proceedings to locate non-published studies. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed for any candidate studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of the candidate articles. All eligible RCTs will be obtained in full text to perform a review. Disagreement on eligibility of an RCT will be solved by group discussion. The information of participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes from included RCTs will be recorded and summarised. The primary outcome is time to complete wound healing. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of burns completely healed at the end of treatment, change in wound surface area at the end of treatment, incidence of adverse events, etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The result of this review will provide evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings in the management of PTB. It will also facilitate decision-making in choosing a suitable wound dressing. We will disseminate the review through a peer-review journal and conference abstracts or posters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42016041574; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5372024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53720242017-04-12 Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis Jiang, Qiong Chen, Zhao-Hong Wang, Shun-Bin Chen, Xiao-Dong BMJ Open Dermatology INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect evidence of wound dressings in the management of PTB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the wound-healing effect of a wound dressing in the management of PTB. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register and CINAHL. A comprehensive search strategy is developed to retrieve articles reporting potentially eligible RCTs. Besides, we will contact the experts in the field and review the conference proceedings to locate non-published studies. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed for any candidate studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of the candidate articles. All eligible RCTs will be obtained in full text to perform a review. Disagreement on eligibility of an RCT will be solved by group discussion. The information of participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes from included RCTs will be recorded and summarised. The primary outcome is time to complete wound healing. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of burns completely healed at the end of treatment, change in wound surface area at the end of treatment, incidence of adverse events, etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The result of this review will provide evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings in the management of PTB. It will also facilitate decision-making in choosing a suitable wound dressing. We will disseminate the review through a peer-review journal and conference abstracts or posters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42016041574; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5372024/ /pubmed/28336737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Jiang, Qiong Chen, Zhao-Hong Wang, Shun-Bin Chen, Xiao-Dong Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a bayesian framework network meta-analysis |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangqiong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis AT chenzhaohong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis AT wangshunbin comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis AT chenxiaodong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis |