Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Qiong, Chen, Zhao-Hong, Wang, Shun-Bin, Chen, Xiao-Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289
_version_ 1782518542289076224
author Jiang, Qiong
Chen, Zhao-Hong
Wang, Shun-Bin
Chen, Xiao-Dong
author_facet Jiang, Qiong
Chen, Zhao-Hong
Wang, Shun-Bin
Chen, Xiao-Dong
author_sort Jiang, Qiong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect evidence of wound dressings in the management of PTB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the wound-healing effect of a wound dressing in the management of PTB. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register and CINAHL. A comprehensive search strategy is developed to retrieve articles reporting potentially eligible RCTs. Besides, we will contact the experts in the field and review the conference proceedings to locate non-published studies. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed for any candidate studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of the candidate articles. All eligible RCTs will be obtained in full text to perform a review. Disagreement on eligibility of an RCT will be solved by group discussion. The information of participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes from included RCTs will be recorded and summarised. The primary outcome is time to complete wound healing. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of burns completely healed at the end of treatment, change in wound surface area at the end of treatment, incidence of adverse events, etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The result of this review will provide evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings in the management of PTB. It will also facilitate decision-making in choosing a suitable wound dressing. We will disseminate the review through a peer-review journal and conference abstracts or posters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42016041574; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53720242017-04-12 Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis Jiang, Qiong Chen, Zhao-Hong Wang, Shun-Bin Chen, Xiao-Dong BMJ Open Dermatology INTRODUCTION: Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect evidence of wound dressings in the management of PTB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the wound-healing effect of a wound dressing in the management of PTB. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register and CINAHL. A comprehensive search strategy is developed to retrieve articles reporting potentially eligible RCTs. Besides, we will contact the experts in the field and review the conference proceedings to locate non-published studies. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed for any candidate studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of the candidate articles. All eligible RCTs will be obtained in full text to perform a review. Disagreement on eligibility of an RCT will be solved by group discussion. The information of participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes from included RCTs will be recorded and summarised. The primary outcome is time to complete wound healing. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of burns completely healed at the end of treatment, change in wound surface area at the end of treatment, incidence of adverse events, etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The result of this review will provide evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings in the management of PTB. It will also facilitate decision-making in choosing a suitable wound dressing. We will disseminate the review through a peer-review journal and conference abstracts or posters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42016041574; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5372024/ /pubmed/28336737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Dermatology
Jiang, Qiong
Chen, Zhao-Hong
Wang, Shun-Bin
Chen, Xiao-Dong
Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a bayesian framework network meta-analysis
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangqiong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenzhaohong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangshunbin comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenxiaodong comparativeeffectivenessofdifferentwounddressingsforpatientswithpartialthicknessburnsstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandabayesianframeworknetworkmetaanalysis