Cargando…

Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool

OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). DESIGN: All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deilkås, Ellen Tveter, Risberg, Madeleine Borgstedt, Haugen, Marion, Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer, Nylén, Urban, Rutberg, Hans, Michael, Soop
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492
_version_ 1782518545340432384
author Deilkås, Ellen Tveter
Risberg, Madeleine Borgstedt
Haugen, Marion
Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer
Nylén, Urban
Rutberg, Hans
Michael, Soop
author_facet Deilkås, Ellen Tveter
Risberg, Madeleine Borgstedt
Haugen, Marion
Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer
Nylén, Urban
Rutberg, Hans
Michael, Soop
author_sort Deilkås, Ellen Tveter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). DESIGN: All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway. Records were randomly selected from all eligible admissions in 2013. Eligible admissions were patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing care with an in-hospital stay of at least 24 hours, excluding psychiatric and care and rehabilitation. Reviews were done according to GTT methodology. SETTING: Similar contexts for healthcare and similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics have inspired the Nordic countries to exchange experiences from measuring and monitoring quality and patient safety in healthcare. The co-operation has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national and local rates of AEs in hospital care. PARTICIPANTS: 10 986 medical records were reviewed in Norway and 19 141 medical records in Sweden. RESULTS: No significant difference between overall AE rates was found between the two countries. The rate was 13.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) in Norway and 14.4% (95% CI 12.6% to 16.3%) in Sweden. There were significantly higher AE rates of surgical complications in Norwegian hospitals compared with Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and ‘other’ AEs. Among more severe AEs, Norwegian hospitals had significantly higher rates of surgical complications than Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of postpartum AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The level of patient safety in acute care hospitals, as assessed by GTT, was essentially the same in both countries. The differences between the countries in the rates of several types of AEs provide new incentives for Norwegian and Swedish governing bodies to address patient safety issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53720412017-04-12 Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool Deilkås, Ellen Tveter Risberg, Madeleine Borgstedt Haugen, Marion Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer Nylén, Urban Rutberg, Hans Michael, Soop BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). DESIGN: All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway. Records were randomly selected from all eligible admissions in 2013. Eligible admissions were patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing care with an in-hospital stay of at least 24 hours, excluding psychiatric and care and rehabilitation. Reviews were done according to GTT methodology. SETTING: Similar contexts for healthcare and similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics have inspired the Nordic countries to exchange experiences from measuring and monitoring quality and patient safety in healthcare. The co-operation has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national and local rates of AEs in hospital care. PARTICIPANTS: 10 986 medical records were reviewed in Norway and 19 141 medical records in Sweden. RESULTS: No significant difference between overall AE rates was found between the two countries. The rate was 13.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) in Norway and 14.4% (95% CI 12.6% to 16.3%) in Sweden. There were significantly higher AE rates of surgical complications in Norwegian hospitals compared with Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and ‘other’ AEs. Among more severe AEs, Norwegian hospitals had significantly higher rates of surgical complications than Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of postpartum AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The level of patient safety in acute care hospitals, as assessed by GTT, was essentially the same in both countries. The differences between the countries in the rates of several types of AEs provide new incentives for Norwegian and Swedish governing bodies to address patient safety issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5372041/ /pubmed/28320786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Deilkås, Ellen Tveter
Risberg, Madeleine Borgstedt
Haugen, Marion
Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer
Nylén, Urban
Rutberg, Hans
Michael, Soop
Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title_full Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title_fullStr Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title_full_unstemmed Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title_short Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
title_sort exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between norway and sweden using global trigger tool
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492
work_keys_str_mv AT deilkasellentveter exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT risbergmadeleineborgstedt exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT haugenmarion exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT lindstrømjonaschristoffer exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT nylenurban exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT rutberghans exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool
AT michaelsoop exploringsimilaritiesanddifferencesinhospitaladverseeventratesbetweennorwayandswedenusingglobaltriggertool