Cargando…

Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: To identify, critically appraise and summarise existing systematic reviews on the impact of global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews published between January 2005 and October...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Dylan R J, Tompson, Alice C, Onakpoya, Igho J, Roberts, Nia, Ward, Alison M, Heneghan, Carl J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013650
_version_ 1782518551645519872
author Collins, Dylan R J
Tompson, Alice C
Onakpoya, Igho J
Roberts, Nia
Ward, Alison M
Heneghan, Carl J
author_facet Collins, Dylan R J
Tompson, Alice C
Onakpoya, Igho J
Roberts, Nia
Ward, Alison M
Heneghan, Carl J
author_sort Collins, Dylan R J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify, critically appraise and summarise existing systematic reviews on the impact of global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews published between January 2005 and October 2016 in The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE or CINAHL databases, and post hoc analysis of primary trials. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, OUTCOMES: Systematic reviews of interventions involving global cardiovascular risk assessment relative to no formal risk assessment in adults with no history of CVD. The primary outcomes of interest were CVD-related morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP), cholesterol and smoking. RESULTS: We identified six systematic reviews of variable but generally of low quality (mean Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 4.2/11, range 0/11 to 7/11). No studies identified by the systematic reviews reported CVD-related morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis of reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed small reductions in SBP (mean difference (MD) −2.22 mm Hg (95% CI −3.49 to −0.95); I(2)=66%; n=9; GRADE: very low), total cholesterol (MD −0.11 mmol/L (95% CI −0.20 to −0.02); I(2)=72%; n=5; GRADE: very low), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD −0.15 mmol/L (95% CI −0.26 to −0.05), I(2)=47%; n=4; GRADE: very low) and smoking cessation (RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.43); I(2)=17%; n=7; GRADE: low). The median follow-up time of reported RCTs was 12 months (range 2–36 months). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of existing systematic reviews was generally poor and there is currently no evidence reported in these reviews that the prospective use of global cardiovascular risk assessment translates to reductions in CVD morbidity or mortality. There are reductions in SBP, cholesterol and smoking but they may not be clinically significant given their small effect size and short duration. Resources need to be directed to conduct high-quality systematic reviews focusing on hard patient outcomes, and likely further primary RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019821.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53720722017-04-12 Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews Collins, Dylan R J Tompson, Alice C Onakpoya, Igho J Roberts, Nia Ward, Alison M Heneghan, Carl J BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To identify, critically appraise and summarise existing systematic reviews on the impact of global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews published between January 2005 and October 2016 in The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE or CINAHL databases, and post hoc analysis of primary trials. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, OUTCOMES: Systematic reviews of interventions involving global cardiovascular risk assessment relative to no formal risk assessment in adults with no history of CVD. The primary outcomes of interest were CVD-related morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP), cholesterol and smoking. RESULTS: We identified six systematic reviews of variable but generally of low quality (mean Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 4.2/11, range 0/11 to 7/11). No studies identified by the systematic reviews reported CVD-related morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis of reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed small reductions in SBP (mean difference (MD) −2.22 mm Hg (95% CI −3.49 to −0.95); I(2)=66%; n=9; GRADE: very low), total cholesterol (MD −0.11 mmol/L (95% CI −0.20 to −0.02); I(2)=72%; n=5; GRADE: very low), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD −0.15 mmol/L (95% CI −0.26 to −0.05), I(2)=47%; n=4; GRADE: very low) and smoking cessation (RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.43); I(2)=17%; n=7; GRADE: low). The median follow-up time of reported RCTs was 12 months (range 2–36 months). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of existing systematic reviews was generally poor and there is currently no evidence reported in these reviews that the prospective use of global cardiovascular risk assessment translates to reductions in CVD morbidity or mortality. There are reductions in SBP, cholesterol and smoking but they may not be clinically significant given their small effect size and short duration. Resources need to be directed to conduct high-quality systematic reviews focusing on hard patient outcomes, and likely further primary RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019821. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5372072/ /pubmed/28341688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013650 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Collins, Dylan R J
Tompson, Alice C
Onakpoya, Igho J
Roberts, Nia
Ward, Alison M
Heneghan, Carl J
Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title_short Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
title_sort global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013650
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsdylanrj globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT tompsonalicec globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT onakpoyaighoj globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT robertsnia globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT wardalisonm globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT heneghancarlj globalcardiovascularriskassessmentintheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseinadultssystematicreviewofsystematicreviews