Cargando…

Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Single outpatient oncology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miles, A, Chronakis, I, Fox, J, Mayer, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935
_version_ 1782518560426295296
author Miles, A
Chronakis, I
Fox, J
Mayer, A
author_facet Miles, A
Chronakis, I
Fox, J
Mayer, A
author_sort Miles, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Single outpatient oncology department in central London. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive recruitment of 13 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, 12 of whom completed the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; complete resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; patients within 14–56 days after surgery; no contraindication to adjuvant chemotherapy; able to give written informed consent. Exclusion criterion: previous chemotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Patient perceived usefulness (assessed by the PrepDM questionnaire) and acceptability of the DA. RESULTS: PrepDM scores, measuring the perceived usefulness of the DA in preparing the patient to communicate with their doctor and make a health decision, were above those reported in other patient groups. Patient acceptability scores were also high; however, interviews showed that there was evidence of a lack of understanding of key information among some patients, in particular their baseline risk of recurrence, the net benefit of combination chemotherapy and the rationale for having chemotherapy when cancer had apparently gone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients found the DA acceptable and useful in supporting their decision about whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. Suggested improvements for the DA include: sequential presentation of treatment options (eg, no treatment vs 1 drug, 1 drug vs 2 drugs) to enhance patient understanding of the difference between combination and single therapy, diagrams to help patients understand the rationale for chemotherapy to prevent a recurrence and inbuilt checks on patient understanding of baseline risk of recurrence and net benefit of chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53721122017-04-12 Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation Miles, A Chronakis, I Fox, J Mayer, A BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Single outpatient oncology department in central London. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive recruitment of 13 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, 12 of whom completed the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; complete resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; patients within 14–56 days after surgery; no contraindication to adjuvant chemotherapy; able to give written informed consent. Exclusion criterion: previous chemotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Patient perceived usefulness (assessed by the PrepDM questionnaire) and acceptability of the DA. RESULTS: PrepDM scores, measuring the perceived usefulness of the DA in preparing the patient to communicate with their doctor and make a health decision, were above those reported in other patient groups. Patient acceptability scores were also high; however, interviews showed that there was evidence of a lack of understanding of key information among some patients, in particular their baseline risk of recurrence, the net benefit of combination chemotherapy and the rationale for having chemotherapy when cancer had apparently gone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients found the DA acceptable and useful in supporting their decision about whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. Suggested improvements for the DA include: sequential presentation of treatment options (eg, no treatment vs 1 drug, 1 drug vs 2 drugs) to enhance patient understanding of the difference between combination and single therapy, diagrams to help patients understand the rationale for chemotherapy to prevent a recurrence and inbuilt checks on patient understanding of baseline risk of recurrence and net benefit of chemotherapy. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5372112/ /pubmed/28341685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Miles, A
Chronakis, I
Fox, J
Mayer, A
Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title_full Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title_fullStr Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title_short Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
title_sort use of a computerised decision aid (da) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage ii colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935
work_keys_str_mv AT milesa useofacomputeriseddecisionaiddatoinformthedecisionprocessonadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageiicolorectalcancerdevelopmentandpreliminaryevaluation
AT chronakisi useofacomputeriseddecisionaiddatoinformthedecisionprocessonadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageiicolorectalcancerdevelopmentandpreliminaryevaluation
AT foxj useofacomputeriseddecisionaiddatoinformthedecisionprocessonadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageiicolorectalcancerdevelopmentandpreliminaryevaluation
AT mayera useofacomputeriseddecisionaiddatoinformthedecisionprocessonadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageiicolorectalcancerdevelopmentandpreliminaryevaluation