Cargando…

Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study

OBJECTIVES: To compare user experiences of 8 regional urgent and emergency care systems in the Republic of Ireland, and explore potential avenues for improvement. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Several distinct models of urgent and emergency care operate in Ireland, as system reconfigura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Conor, Droog, Elsa, Boyce, Maria, Healy, Orla, Browne, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013339
_version_ 1782518561114161152
author Foley, Conor
Droog, Elsa
Boyce, Maria
Healy, Orla
Browne, John
author_facet Foley, Conor
Droog, Elsa
Boyce, Maria
Healy, Orla
Browne, John
author_sort Foley, Conor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare user experiences of 8 regional urgent and emergency care systems in the Republic of Ireland, and explore potential avenues for improvement. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Several distinct models of urgent and emergency care operate in Ireland, as system reconfiguration has been implemented in some regions but not others. The Urgent Care System Questionnaire was used to explore service users' experiences with urgent and emergency care. Linear regression and logistic regression were used to detect regional variation in each of the 3 domains and overall ratings of care. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample (N=8002) of the general population was contacted by telephone, yielding 1205 participants who self-identified as having used urgent and emergency care services in the previous 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient experience was assessed across 3 domains: entry into the system, progress through the system and patient convenience of the system. Participants were also asked to provide an overall rating of the care they received. RESULTS: Service users in Dublin North East gave lower ratings on the entry into the system scale than those in Dublin South (adjusted mean difference=−0.18; 95% CI −0.35 to −0.10; p=0.038). For overall ratings of care, service users in the Mid-West were less likely than those in Dublin North East to give an excellent rating (adjusted OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92; p=0.022). Survey items relating to communication, and consideration of patients' needs were comparatively poorly rated. The use of public emergency departments and out-of-hours general practice care was associated with poorer patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent relationship was found between the type of urgent and emergency care model in different regions and patient experience. Scale-level data may not offer a useful metric for exploring the impact of system-level service change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53721152017-04-12 Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study Foley, Conor Droog, Elsa Boyce, Maria Healy, Orla Browne, John BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To compare user experiences of 8 regional urgent and emergency care systems in the Republic of Ireland, and explore potential avenues for improvement. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Several distinct models of urgent and emergency care operate in Ireland, as system reconfiguration has been implemented in some regions but not others. The Urgent Care System Questionnaire was used to explore service users' experiences with urgent and emergency care. Linear regression and logistic regression were used to detect regional variation in each of the 3 domains and overall ratings of care. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample (N=8002) of the general population was contacted by telephone, yielding 1205 participants who self-identified as having used urgent and emergency care services in the previous 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient experience was assessed across 3 domains: entry into the system, progress through the system and patient convenience of the system. Participants were also asked to provide an overall rating of the care they received. RESULTS: Service users in Dublin North East gave lower ratings on the entry into the system scale than those in Dublin South (adjusted mean difference=−0.18; 95% CI −0.35 to −0.10; p=0.038). For overall ratings of care, service users in the Mid-West were less likely than those in Dublin North East to give an excellent rating (adjusted OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92; p=0.022). Survey items relating to communication, and consideration of patients' needs were comparatively poorly rated. The use of public emergency departments and out-of-hours general practice care was associated with poorer patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent relationship was found between the type of urgent and emergency care model in different regions and patient experience. Scale-level data may not offer a useful metric for exploring the impact of system-level service change. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5372115/ /pubmed/28320790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013339 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Foley, Conor
Droog, Elsa
Boyce, Maria
Healy, Orla
Browne, John
Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title_full Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title_fullStr Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title_full_unstemmed Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title_short Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
title_sort patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013339
work_keys_str_mv AT foleyconor patientexperienceofdifferentregionalmodelsofurgentandemergencycareacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT droogelsa patientexperienceofdifferentregionalmodelsofurgentandemergencycareacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT boycemaria patientexperienceofdifferentregionalmodelsofurgentandemergencycareacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT healyorla patientexperienceofdifferentregionalmodelsofurgentandemergencycareacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT brownejohn patientexperienceofdifferentregionalmodelsofurgentandemergencycareacrosssectionalsurveystudy