Cargando…

Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the length of time between receiving funding and publishing the protocol and main paper for randomised controlled trials. DESIGN: An observational study using survival analysis. SETTING: Publicly funded health and medical research in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Randomised controll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Strand, Linn Beate, Clarke, Philip, Graves, Nicholas, Barnett, Adrian G
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012212

Ejemplares similares

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cross-sectional study of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials: assessment of time to publication and publication history
por: Mooney, LaVerne A, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of retrospective registration in clinical trial publications: a cross-sectional study of German trials
por: Haslberger, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Gender and ethnic differences in publication of BMJ letters to the editor: an observational study using machine learning
por: Zeina, Mohamad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years
por: Loder, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional study
por: Earley, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
por: Rowhani-Farid, Anisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
por: Chow, Natalie L.Y., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Validity of sample sizes in publications of randomised controlled trials on the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: cross-sectional evaluation
por: Tulka, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
por: Maggio, Lauren A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol
por: Zarshenas, Sareh, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015
por: Pu, Qiang-Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of patient involvement: a mixed-methods analysis of current practice in health research publications using a targeted search strategy
por: Weschke, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Are methodological quality and completeness of reporting associated with citation-based measures of publication impact? A secondary analysis of a systematic review of dementia biomarker studies
por: Mackinnon, Shona, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study
por: Salholz-Hillel, Maia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study
por: Barnett, Adrian G., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions for early phase dose-finding clinical trials: the DEFINE (DosE-FIndiNg Extensions) study protocol
por: Espinasse, Aude, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
por: Butcher, Nancy J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations
por: Gewandter, Jennifer S, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study
por: van den Bogert, Cornelis A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Involving clinical experts in prioritising topics for health technology assessment: a randomised controlled trial
por: Cook, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
por: Ivlev, Ilya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers’ perceptions of clinical educational articles: a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study
por: Mamtani, Mira, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting of data on participant ethnicity and socioeconomic status in high-impact medical journals: a targeted literature review
por: Buttery, Sara C, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quantitative investigation of inappropriate regression model construction and the importance of medical statistics experts in observational medical research: a cross-sectional study
por: Nojima, Masanori, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study
por: Hughes, Shannon, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0epie9bkq6jkfbk9l84a3ql023