Cargando…

Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy

The Prostate Health Index (PHI) has been used increasingly in the context of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics since 2010. Previous studies have shown an association between PHI and a tumor volume of >0.5 cm(3). The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between PHI and tumor volume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedersdorff, Frank, Groß, Britt, Maxeiner, Andreas, Jung, Klaus, Miller, Kurt, Stephan, Carsten, Busch, Jonas, Kilic, Ergin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28245570
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030488
_version_ 1782518630904233984
author Friedersdorff, Frank
Groß, Britt
Maxeiner, Andreas
Jung, Klaus
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
Busch, Jonas
Kilic, Ergin
author_facet Friedersdorff, Frank
Groß, Britt
Maxeiner, Andreas
Jung, Klaus
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
Busch, Jonas
Kilic, Ergin
author_sort Friedersdorff, Frank
collection PubMed
description The Prostate Health Index (PHI) has been used increasingly in the context of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics since 2010. Previous studies have shown an association between PHI and a tumor volume of >0.5 cm(3). The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between PHI and tumor volume as well as the Gleason score. A total of 196 selected patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study. The tumor volume was calculated and preoperative serum parameters total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), [−2]proPSA, and PHI were evaluated. The association between the pathological findings such as Gleason score, pathological T-stage (pT stage), and tumor volume were evaluated. We further used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for assessing the association between tumor volume and PHI and for predicting biochemical recurrence. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, PHI is the most accurate predictor of a tumor volumes >0.5 cm(3). Moreover, PHI correlates significantly with the tumor volume (r = 0.588), which is significantly different (p = 0.008) from the correlation of the Gleason score with tumor volume (r = 0.385). PHI correlates more strongly with the tumor volume than does the Gleason score. Using PHI improves the prediction of larger tumor volume and subsequently clinically significant cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5372504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53725042017-04-10 Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy Friedersdorff, Frank Groß, Britt Maxeiner, Andreas Jung, Klaus Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten Busch, Jonas Kilic, Ergin Int J Mol Sci Article The Prostate Health Index (PHI) has been used increasingly in the context of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics since 2010. Previous studies have shown an association between PHI and a tumor volume of >0.5 cm(3). The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between PHI and tumor volume as well as the Gleason score. A total of 196 selected patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study. The tumor volume was calculated and preoperative serum parameters total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), [−2]proPSA, and PHI were evaluated. The association between the pathological findings such as Gleason score, pathological T-stage (pT stage), and tumor volume were evaluated. We further used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for assessing the association between tumor volume and PHI and for predicting biochemical recurrence. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, PHI is the most accurate predictor of a tumor volumes >0.5 cm(3). Moreover, PHI correlates significantly with the tumor volume (r = 0.588), which is significantly different (p = 0.008) from the correlation of the Gleason score with tumor volume (r = 0.385). PHI correlates more strongly with the tumor volume than does the Gleason score. Using PHI improves the prediction of larger tumor volume and subsequently clinically significant cancer. MDPI 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5372504/ /pubmed/28245570 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030488 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Friedersdorff, Frank
Groß, Britt
Maxeiner, Andreas
Jung, Klaus
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
Busch, Jonas
Kilic, Ergin
Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title_full Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title_short Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?—A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort does the prostate health index depend on tumor volume?—a study on 196 patients after radical prostatectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28245570
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030488
work_keys_str_mv AT friedersdorfffrank doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT großbritt doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT maxeinerandreas doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT jungklaus doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT millerkurt doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT stephancarsten doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT buschjonas doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kilicergin doestheprostatehealthindexdependontumorvolumeastudyon196patientsafterradicalprostatectomy