Cargando…
Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device
Although mammography has been the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer, if a woman has dense breast tissue, a false negative diagnosis may occur. Breast ultrasound, whether hand-held or automated, is a useful adjunct to mammography but adds extra time and cost. The primary aim was...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7010017 |
_version_ | 1782518740528660480 |
---|---|
author | Padia, Kamila Douglas, Tania S. Cairncross, Lydia L. Baasch, Roland V. Vaughan, Christopher L. |
author_facet | Padia, Kamila Douglas, Tania S. Cairncross, Lydia L. Baasch, Roland V. Vaughan, Christopher L. |
author_sort | Padia, Kamila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although mammography has been the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer, if a woman has dense breast tissue, a false negative diagnosis may occur. Breast ultrasound, whether hand-held or automated, is a useful adjunct to mammography but adds extra time and cost. The primary aim was to demonstrate that our second-generation Aceso system, which combines full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in a single platform, is able to produce improved quality images that provide clinically meaningful results. Aceso was first tested using two industry standards: a Contrast Detail Mammography (CDMAM) phantom to assess the FFDM images, and the CIRS 054GS phantom to evaluate the ABUS images. In addition, 25 women participated in a clinical trial: 14 were healthy volunteers, while 11 were patients referred by the breast clinic at Groote Schuur Hospital. The CDMAM phantom results showed the FFDM results were better than the European Reference (EUREF) standard of “acceptable” and were approaching “achievable”. The ABUS results showed a lateral and axial spatial resolution of 0.5 mm and an adequate depth penetration of 80 mm. Our second-generation Aceso system, with its improved quality of clinical FFDM and ABUS images, has demonstrated its potential for the early detection of breast cancer in a busy clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5373026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53730262017-04-05 Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device Padia, Kamila Douglas, Tania S. Cairncross, Lydia L. Baasch, Roland V. Vaughan, Christopher L. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Although mammography has been the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer, if a woman has dense breast tissue, a false negative diagnosis may occur. Breast ultrasound, whether hand-held or automated, is a useful adjunct to mammography but adds extra time and cost. The primary aim was to demonstrate that our second-generation Aceso system, which combines full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in a single platform, is able to produce improved quality images that provide clinically meaningful results. Aceso was first tested using two industry standards: a Contrast Detail Mammography (CDMAM) phantom to assess the FFDM images, and the CIRS 054GS phantom to evaluate the ABUS images. In addition, 25 women participated in a clinical trial: 14 were healthy volunteers, while 11 were patients referred by the breast clinic at Groote Schuur Hospital. The CDMAM phantom results showed the FFDM results were better than the European Reference (EUREF) standard of “acceptable” and were approaching “achievable”. The ABUS results showed a lateral and axial spatial resolution of 0.5 mm and an adequate depth penetration of 80 mm. Our second-generation Aceso system, with its improved quality of clinical FFDM and ABUS images, has demonstrated its potential for the early detection of breast cancer in a busy clinic. MDPI 2017-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5373026/ /pubmed/28335472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7010017 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Padia, Kamila Douglas, Tania S. Cairncross, Lydia L. Baasch, Roland V. Vaughan, Christopher L. Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title | Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title_full | Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title_fullStr | Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title_short | Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device |
title_sort | detecting breast cancer with a dual-modality device |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7010017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT padiakamila detectingbreastcancerwithadualmodalitydevice AT douglastanias detectingbreastcancerwithadualmodalitydevice AT cairncrosslydial detectingbreastcancerwithadualmodalitydevice AT baaschrolandv detectingbreastcancerwithadualmodalitydevice AT vaughanchristopherl detectingbreastcancerwithadualmodalitydevice |