Cargando…
Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
[Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geoch...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151 |
_version_ | 1782518785912078336 |
---|---|
author | Groenenberg, Jan E. Römkens, Paul F. A. M. Zomeren, André Van Rodrigues, Sonia M. Comans, Rob N.J. |
author_facet | Groenenberg, Jan E. Römkens, Paul F. A. M. Zomeren, André Van Rodrigues, Sonia M. Comans, Rob N.J. |
author_sort | Groenenberg, Jan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geochemical modeling. Model predictions indicate that the extraction recovers the reactive concentration quantitatively (>90%). However, at low ratios of element to reactive surfaces the extraction underestimates reactive Cu, Cr, As, and Mo, that is, elements with a particularly high affinity for organic matter or oxides. The 0.43 M HNO(3) together with more dilute and concentrated acid extractions were evaluated by comparing model-predicted and measured dissolved concentrations in CaCl(2) soil extracts, using the different extractions as alternative model-input. Mean errors of the predictions based on 0.43 M HNO(3) are generally within a factor three, while Mo is underestimated and Co, Ni and Zn in soils with pH > 6 are overestimated, for which possible causes are discussed. Model predictions using 0.43 M HNO(3) are superior to those using 0.1 M HNO(3) or Aqua Regia that under- and overestimate the reactive element contents, respectively. Low concentrations of oxyanions in our data set and structural underestimation of their reactive concentrations warrant further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5373566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53735662017-03-31 Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil Groenenberg, Jan E. Römkens, Paul F. A. M. Zomeren, André Van Rodrigues, Sonia M. Comans, Rob N.J. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geochemical modeling. Model predictions indicate that the extraction recovers the reactive concentration quantitatively (>90%). However, at low ratios of element to reactive surfaces the extraction underestimates reactive Cu, Cr, As, and Mo, that is, elements with a particularly high affinity for organic matter or oxides. The 0.43 M HNO(3) together with more dilute and concentrated acid extractions were evaluated by comparing model-predicted and measured dissolved concentrations in CaCl(2) soil extracts, using the different extractions as alternative model-input. Mean errors of the predictions based on 0.43 M HNO(3) are generally within a factor three, while Mo is underestimated and Co, Ni and Zn in soils with pH > 6 are overestimated, for which possible causes are discussed. Model predictions using 0.43 M HNO(3) are superior to those using 0.1 M HNO(3) or Aqua Regia that under- and overestimate the reactive element contents, respectively. Low concentrations of oxyanions in our data set and structural underestimation of their reactive concentrations warrant further investigation. American Chemical Society 2017-02-06 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5373566/ /pubmed/28164700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Groenenberg, Jan E. Römkens, Paul F. A. M. Zomeren, André Van Rodrigues, Sonia M. Comans, Rob N.J. Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title | Evaluation
of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid
Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title_full | Evaluation
of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid
Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title_fullStr | Evaluation
of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid
Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation
of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid
Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title_short | Evaluation
of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid
Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil |
title_sort | evaluation
of the single dilute (0.43 m) nitric acid
extraction to determine geochemically reactive elements in soil |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groenenbergjane evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil AT romkenspaulfam evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil AT zomerenandrevan evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil AT rodriguessoniam evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil AT comansrobnj evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil |