Cargando…

Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil

[Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geoch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groenenberg, Jan E., Römkens, Paul F. A. M., Zomeren, André Van, Rodrigues, Sonia M., Comans, Rob N.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151
_version_ 1782518785912078336
author Groenenberg, Jan E.
Römkens, Paul F. A. M.
Zomeren, André Van
Rodrigues, Sonia M.
Comans, Rob N.J.
author_facet Groenenberg, Jan E.
Römkens, Paul F. A. M.
Zomeren, André Van
Rodrigues, Sonia M.
Comans, Rob N.J.
author_sort Groenenberg, Jan E.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geochemical modeling. Model predictions indicate that the extraction recovers the reactive concentration quantitatively (>90%). However, at low ratios of element to reactive surfaces the extraction underestimates reactive Cu, Cr, As, and Mo, that is, elements with a particularly high affinity for organic matter or oxides. The 0.43 M HNO(3) together with more dilute and concentrated acid extractions were evaluated by comparing model-predicted and measured dissolved concentrations in CaCl(2) soil extracts, using the different extractions as alternative model-input. Mean errors of the predictions based on 0.43 M HNO(3) are generally within a factor three, while Mo is underestimated and Co, Ni and Zn in soils with pH > 6 are overestimated, for which possible causes are discussed. Model predictions using 0.43 M HNO(3) are superior to those using 0.1 M HNO(3) or Aqua Regia that under- and overestimate the reactive element contents, respectively. Low concentrations of oxyanions in our data set and structural underestimation of their reactive concentrations warrant further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5373566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53735662017-03-31 Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil Groenenberg, Jan E. Römkens, Paul F. A. M. Zomeren, André Van Rodrigues, Sonia M. Comans, Rob N.J. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Recently a dilute nitric acid extraction (0.43 M) was adopted by ISO (ISO-17586:2016) as standard for extraction of geochemically reactive elements in soil and soil like materials. Here we evaluate the performance of this extraction for a wide range of elements by mechanistic geochemical modeling. Model predictions indicate that the extraction recovers the reactive concentration quantitatively (>90%). However, at low ratios of element to reactive surfaces the extraction underestimates reactive Cu, Cr, As, and Mo, that is, elements with a particularly high affinity for organic matter or oxides. The 0.43 M HNO(3) together with more dilute and concentrated acid extractions were evaluated by comparing model-predicted and measured dissolved concentrations in CaCl(2) soil extracts, using the different extractions as alternative model-input. Mean errors of the predictions based on 0.43 M HNO(3) are generally within a factor three, while Mo is underestimated and Co, Ni and Zn in soils with pH > 6 are overestimated, for which possible causes are discussed. Model predictions using 0.43 M HNO(3) are superior to those using 0.1 M HNO(3) or Aqua Regia that under- and overestimate the reactive element contents, respectively. Low concentrations of oxyanions in our data set and structural underestimation of their reactive concentrations warrant further investigation. American Chemical Society 2017-02-06 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5373566/ /pubmed/28164700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Groenenberg, Jan E.
Römkens, Paul F. A. M.
Zomeren, André Van
Rodrigues, Sonia M.
Comans, Rob N.J.
Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title_full Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title_short Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil
title_sort evaluation of the single dilute (0.43 m) nitric acid extraction to determine geochemically reactive elements in soil
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05151
work_keys_str_mv AT groenenbergjane evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil
AT romkenspaulfam evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil
AT zomerenandrevan evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil
AT rodriguessoniam evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil
AT comansrobnj evaluationofthesingledilute043mnitricacidextractiontodeterminegeochemicallyreactiveelementsinsoil