Cargando…

Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management

BACKGROUND: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. OBJECTIVES: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Brian E., Barboza, Katherine, Jensen, Ashley E., Bennett, Katelyn J., Sherman, Scott E., Schwartz, Mark D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Schattauer 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197620
http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083
_version_ 1782518808425005056
author Dixon, Brian E.
Barboza, Katherine
Jensen, Ashley E.
Bennett, Katelyn J.
Sherman, Scott E.
Schwartz, Mark D.
author_facet Dixon, Brian E.
Barboza, Katherine
Jensen, Ashley E.
Bennett, Katelyn J.
Sherman, Scott E.
Schwartz, Mark D.
author_sort Dixon, Brian E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. OBJECTIVES: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. METHODS: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-intervention. An 8-item scale (range 0-40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s a=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. RESULTS: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. CONCLUSIONS: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5373760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Schattauer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53737602017-04-06 Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management Dixon, Brian E. Barboza, Katherine Jensen, Ashley E. Bennett, Katelyn J. Sherman, Scott E. Schwartz, Mark D. Appl Clin Inform Research Article BACKGROUND: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. OBJECTIVES: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. METHODS: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-intervention. An 8-item scale (range 0-40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s a=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. RESULTS: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. CONCLUSIONS: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs. Schattauer 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5373760/ /pubmed/28197620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083 Text en © Copyright Schattauer 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License terms: CC-BY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Dixon, Brian E.
Barboza, Katherine
Jensen, Ashley E.
Bennett, Katelyn J.
Sherman, Scott E.
Schwartz, Mark D.
Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title_full Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title_fullStr Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title_short Measuring Practicing Clinicians’ Information Literacy: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management
title_sort measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy: an exploratory analysis in the context of panel management
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197620
http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083
work_keys_str_mv AT dixonbriane measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement
AT barbozakatherine measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement
AT jensenashleye measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement
AT bennettkatelynj measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement
AT shermanscotte measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement
AT schwartzmarkd measuringpracticingcliniciansinformationliteracyanexploratoryanalysisinthecontextofpanelmanagement