Cargando…

Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures

BACKGROUND: Analysis of integrated genome-scale networks is a challenging problem due to heterogeneity of high-throughput data. There are several topological measures, such as graphlet counts, for characterization of biological networks. RESULTS: In this paper, we present methods for counting small...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonmez, Arzu Burcak, Can, Tolga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1525-z
_version_ 1782518910020485120
author Sonmez, Arzu Burcak
Can, Tolga
author_facet Sonmez, Arzu Burcak
Can, Tolga
author_sort Sonmez, Arzu Burcak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analysis of integrated genome-scale networks is a challenging problem due to heterogeneity of high-throughput data. There are several topological measures, such as graphlet counts, for characterization of biological networks. RESULTS: In this paper, we present methods for counting small sub-graph patterns in integrated genome-scale networks which are modeled as labeled multidigraphs. We have obtained physical, regulatory, and metabolic interactions between H. sapiens proteins from the Pathway Commons database. The integrated network is filtered for tissue/disease specific proteins by using a large-scale human transcriptional profiling study, resulting in several tissue and disease specific sub-networks. We have applied and extended the idea of graphlet counting in undirected protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to directed multi-labeled networks and represented each network as a vector of graphlet counts. Graphlet counts are assessed for statistical significance by comparison against a set of randomized networks. We present our results on analysis of differential graphlets between different conditions and on the utility of graphlet count vectors for clustering multiple condition specific networks. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there are numerous statistically significant graphlets in integrated biological networks and the graphlet signature vector can be used as an effective representation of a multi-labeled network for clustering and systems level analysis of tissue/disease specific networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5374550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53745502017-03-31 Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures Sonmez, Arzu Burcak Can, Tolga BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Analysis of integrated genome-scale networks is a challenging problem due to heterogeneity of high-throughput data. There are several topological measures, such as graphlet counts, for characterization of biological networks. RESULTS: In this paper, we present methods for counting small sub-graph patterns in integrated genome-scale networks which are modeled as labeled multidigraphs. We have obtained physical, regulatory, and metabolic interactions between H. sapiens proteins from the Pathway Commons database. The integrated network is filtered for tissue/disease specific proteins by using a large-scale human transcriptional profiling study, resulting in several tissue and disease specific sub-networks. We have applied and extended the idea of graphlet counting in undirected protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to directed multi-labeled networks and represented each network as a vector of graphlet counts. Graphlet counts are assessed for statistical significance by comparison against a set of randomized networks. We present our results on analysis of differential graphlets between different conditions and on the utility of graphlet count vectors for clustering multiple condition specific networks. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there are numerous statistically significant graphlets in integrated biological networks and the graphlet signature vector can be used as an effective representation of a multi-labeled network for clustering and systems level analysis of tissue/disease specific networks. BioMed Central 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5374550/ /pubmed/28361704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1525-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sonmez, Arzu Burcak
Can, Tolga
Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title_full Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title_fullStr Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title_short Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
title_sort comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1525-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sonmezarzuburcak comparisonoftissuediseasespecificintegratednetworksusingdirectedgraphletsignatures
AT cantolga comparisonoftissuediseasespecificintegratednetworksusingdirectedgraphletsignatures