Cargando…

Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging

BACKGROUND: Time resolved 4D phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in mice is challenging due to long scan times, small animal ECG-gating and the rapid blood flow and cardiac motion of small rodents. To overcome several of these technical challenges we implemented a retrospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krämer, M., Motaal, A. G., Herrmann, K-H., Löffler, B., Reichenbach, J. R., Strijkers, G. J., Hoerr, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28359292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9
_version_ 1782518923939282944
author Krämer, M.
Motaal, A. G.
Herrmann, K-H.
Löffler, B.
Reichenbach, J. R.
Strijkers, G. J.
Hoerr, V.
author_facet Krämer, M.
Motaal, A. G.
Herrmann, K-H.
Löffler, B.
Reichenbach, J. R.
Strijkers, G. J.
Hoerr, V.
author_sort Krämer, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Time resolved 4D phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in mice is challenging due to long scan times, small animal ECG-gating and the rapid blood flow and cardiac motion of small rodents. To overcome several of these technical challenges we implemented a retrospectively self-gated 4D PC radial ultra-short echo-time (UTE) acquisition scheme and assessed its performance in healthy mice by comparing the results with those obtained with an ECG-triggered 4D PC fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence. METHODS: Cardiac 4D PC CMR images were acquired at 9.4 T in healthy mice using the proposed self-gated radial center-out UTE acquisition scheme (TE/TR of 0.5 ms/3.1 ms) and a standard Cartesian 4D PC imaging sequence (TE/TR of 2.1 ms/5.0 ms) with a four-point Hadamard flow encoding scheme. To validate the proposed UTE flow imaging technique, experiments on a flow phantom with variable pump rates were performed. RESULTS: The anatomical images and flow velocity maps of the proposed 4D PC UTE technique showed reduced artifacts and an improved SNR (left ventricular cavity (LV): 8.9 ± 2.5, myocardium (MC): 15.7 ± 1.9) compared to those obtained using a typical Cartesian FLASH sequence (LV: 5.6 ± 1.2, MC: 10.1 ± 1.4) that was used as a reference. With both sequences comparable flow velocities were obtained in the flow phantom as well as in the ascending aorta (UTE: 132.8 ± 18.3 cm/s, FLASH: 134.7 ± 13.4 cm/s) and pulmonary artery (UTE: 78.5 ± 15.4 cm/s, FLASH: 86.6 ± 6.2 cm/s) of the animals. Self-gated navigator signals derived from information of the oversampled k-space center were successfully extracted for all animals with a higher gating efficiency of time spent on acquiring gated data versus total measurement time (UTE: 61.8 ± 11.5%, FLASH: 48.5 ± 4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed self-gated 4D PC UTE sequence enables robust and accurate flow velocity mapping of the mouse heart in vivo at high magnetic fields. At the same time SNR, gating efficiency, flow artifacts and image quality all improved compared to the images obtained using the well-established, ECG-triggered, 4D PC FLASH sequence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5374606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53746062017-03-31 Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging Krämer, M. Motaal, A. G. Herrmann, K-H. Löffler, B. Reichenbach, J. R. Strijkers, G. J. Hoerr, V. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Time resolved 4D phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in mice is challenging due to long scan times, small animal ECG-gating and the rapid blood flow and cardiac motion of small rodents. To overcome several of these technical challenges we implemented a retrospectively self-gated 4D PC radial ultra-short echo-time (UTE) acquisition scheme and assessed its performance in healthy mice by comparing the results with those obtained with an ECG-triggered 4D PC fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence. METHODS: Cardiac 4D PC CMR images were acquired at 9.4 T in healthy mice using the proposed self-gated radial center-out UTE acquisition scheme (TE/TR of 0.5 ms/3.1 ms) and a standard Cartesian 4D PC imaging sequence (TE/TR of 2.1 ms/5.0 ms) with a four-point Hadamard flow encoding scheme. To validate the proposed UTE flow imaging technique, experiments on a flow phantom with variable pump rates were performed. RESULTS: The anatomical images and flow velocity maps of the proposed 4D PC UTE technique showed reduced artifacts and an improved SNR (left ventricular cavity (LV): 8.9 ± 2.5, myocardium (MC): 15.7 ± 1.9) compared to those obtained using a typical Cartesian FLASH sequence (LV: 5.6 ± 1.2, MC: 10.1 ± 1.4) that was used as a reference. With both sequences comparable flow velocities were obtained in the flow phantom as well as in the ascending aorta (UTE: 132.8 ± 18.3 cm/s, FLASH: 134.7 ± 13.4 cm/s) and pulmonary artery (UTE: 78.5 ± 15.4 cm/s, FLASH: 86.6 ± 6.2 cm/s) of the animals. Self-gated navigator signals derived from information of the oversampled k-space center were successfully extracted for all animals with a higher gating efficiency of time spent on acquiring gated data versus total measurement time (UTE: 61.8 ± 11.5%, FLASH: 48.5 ± 4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed self-gated 4D PC UTE sequence enables robust and accurate flow velocity mapping of the mouse heart in vivo at high magnetic fields. At the same time SNR, gating efficiency, flow artifacts and image quality all improved compared to the images obtained using the well-established, ECG-triggered, 4D PC FLASH sequence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5374606/ /pubmed/28359292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Krämer, M.
Motaal, A. G.
Herrmann, K-H.
Löffler, B.
Reichenbach, J. R.
Strijkers, G. J.
Hoerr, V.
Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title_full Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title_fullStr Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title_short Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging
title_sort cardiac 4d phase-contrast cmr at 9.4 t using self-gated ultra-short echo time (ute) imaging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28359292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerm cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT motaalag cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT herrmannkh cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT lofflerb cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT reichenbachjr cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT strijkersgj cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging
AT hoerrv cardiac4dphasecontrastcmrat94tusingselfgatedultrashortechotimeuteimaging