Cargando…

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects

BACKGROUND: Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluation combines relationship information from pedigree and genomic marker data. The inclusion of the genomic information into mixed model equations requires the inverse of the combined relationship matrix [Formula: see text]...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taskinen, Matti, Mäntysaari, Esa A., Strandén, Ismo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28359261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0310-9
_version_ 1782518952268660736
author Taskinen, Matti
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
Strandén, Ismo
author_facet Taskinen, Matti
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
Strandén, Ismo
author_sort Taskinen, Matti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluation combines relationship information from pedigree and genomic marker data. The inclusion of the genomic information into mixed model equations requires the inverse of the combined relationship matrix [Formula: see text] , which has a dense matrix block for genotyped animals. METHODS: To avoid inversion of dense matrices, single-step genomic BLUP can be transformed to single-step single nucleotide polymorphism BLUP (SNP-BLUP) which have observed and imputed marker coefficients. Simple block LDL type decompositions of the single-step relationship matrix [Formula: see text] were derived to obtain different types of linearly equivalent single-step genomic mixed model equations with different sets of reparametrized random effects. For non-genotyped animals, the imputed marker coefficient terms in the single-step SNP-BLUP were calculated on-the-fly during the iterative solution using sparse matrix decompositions without storing the imputed genotypes. Residual polygenic effects were added to genotyped animals and transmitted to non-genotyped animals using relationship coefficients that are similar to imputed genotypes. The relationships were further orthogonalized to improve convergence of iterative methods. RESULTS: All presented single-step SNP-BLUP models can be solved efficiently using iterative methods that rely on iteration on data and sparse matrix approaches. The efficiency, accuracy and iteration convergence of the derived mixed model equations were tested with a small dataset that included 73,579 animals of which 2885 were genotyped with 37,526 SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: Inversion of the large and dense genomic relationship matrix was avoided in single-step evaluation by using fully orthogonalized single-step SNP-BLUP formulations. The number of iterations until convergence was smaller in single-step SNP-BLUP formulations than in the original single-step GBLUP when heritability was low, but increased above that of the original single-step when heritability was high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5374736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53747362017-04-03 Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects Taskinen, Matti Mäntysaari, Esa A. Strandén, Ismo Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluation combines relationship information from pedigree and genomic marker data. The inclusion of the genomic information into mixed model equations requires the inverse of the combined relationship matrix [Formula: see text] , which has a dense matrix block for genotyped animals. METHODS: To avoid inversion of dense matrices, single-step genomic BLUP can be transformed to single-step single nucleotide polymorphism BLUP (SNP-BLUP) which have observed and imputed marker coefficients. Simple block LDL type decompositions of the single-step relationship matrix [Formula: see text] were derived to obtain different types of linearly equivalent single-step genomic mixed model equations with different sets of reparametrized random effects. For non-genotyped animals, the imputed marker coefficient terms in the single-step SNP-BLUP were calculated on-the-fly during the iterative solution using sparse matrix decompositions without storing the imputed genotypes. Residual polygenic effects were added to genotyped animals and transmitted to non-genotyped animals using relationship coefficients that are similar to imputed genotypes. The relationships were further orthogonalized to improve convergence of iterative methods. RESULTS: All presented single-step SNP-BLUP models can be solved efficiently using iterative methods that rely on iteration on data and sparse matrix approaches. The efficiency, accuracy and iteration convergence of the derived mixed model equations were tested with a small dataset that included 73,579 animals of which 2885 were genotyped with 37,526 SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: Inversion of the large and dense genomic relationship matrix was avoided in single-step evaluation by using fully orthogonalized single-step SNP-BLUP formulations. The number of iterations until convergence was smaller in single-step SNP-BLUP formulations than in the original single-step GBLUP when heritability was low, but increased above that of the original single-step when heritability was high. BioMed Central 2017-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5374736/ /pubmed/28359261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0310-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taskinen, Matti
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
Strandén, Ismo
Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title_full Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title_fullStr Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title_full_unstemmed Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title_short Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
title_sort single-step snp-blup with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28359261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0310-9
work_keys_str_mv AT taskinenmatti singlestepsnpblupwithontheflyimputedgenotypesandresidualpolygeniceffects
AT mantysaariesaa singlestepsnpblupwithontheflyimputedgenotypesandresidualpolygeniceffects
AT strandenismo singlestepsnpblupwithontheflyimputedgenotypesandresidualpolygeniceffects