Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale

PURPOSE: Serial assessment of gross motor development of infants at risk is an established procedure in neonatal follow-up clinics. Assessments based on home video recordings could be a relevant addition. METHODS: In 48 infants (1.5-19 months), the concurrent validity of 2 applications was examined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boonzaaijer, Marike, van Dam, Ellen, van Haastert, Ingrid C., Nuysink, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Research Reports
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000363
_version_ 1782518954307092480
author Boonzaaijer, Marike
van Dam, Ellen
van Haastert, Ingrid C.
Nuysink, Jacqueline
author_facet Boonzaaijer, Marike
van Dam, Ellen
van Haastert, Ingrid C.
Nuysink, Jacqueline
author_sort Boonzaaijer, Marike
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Serial assessment of gross motor development of infants at risk is an established procedure in neonatal follow-up clinics. Assessments based on home video recordings could be a relevant addition. METHODS: In 48 infants (1.5-19 months), the concurrent validity of 2 applications was examined using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: (1) a home video made by parents and (2) simultaneous observation on-site by a pediatric physical therapist. Parents' experiences were explored using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement between live and home video assessment was 0.99, with a standard error of measurement of 1.41 items. Intra- and interrater reliability: intraclass correlation coefficients were more than 0.99. According to 94% of the parents, recording their infant's movement repertoire was easy to perform. CONCLUSION: Assessing the Alberta Infant Motor Scale based on home video recordings is comparable to assessment by live observation. The video method is a promising application that can be used with low burden for parents and infants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5374751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53747512017-04-07 Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Boonzaaijer, Marike van Dam, Ellen van Haastert, Ingrid C. Nuysink, Jacqueline Pediatr Phys Ther Research Reports PURPOSE: Serial assessment of gross motor development of infants at risk is an established procedure in neonatal follow-up clinics. Assessments based on home video recordings could be a relevant addition. METHODS: In 48 infants (1.5-19 months), the concurrent validity of 2 applications was examined using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: (1) a home video made by parents and (2) simultaneous observation on-site by a pediatric physical therapist. Parents' experiences were explored using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement between live and home video assessment was 0.99, with a standard error of measurement of 1.41 items. Intra- and interrater reliability: intraclass correlation coefficients were more than 0.99. According to 94% of the parents, recording their infant's movement repertoire was easy to perform. CONCLUSION: Assessing the Alberta Infant Motor Scale based on home video recordings is comparable to assessment by live observation. The video method is a promising application that can be used with low burden for parents and infants. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-04 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5374751/ /pubmed/28350771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000363 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. and the Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of APTA This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Boonzaaijer, Marike
van Dam, Ellen
van Haastert, Ingrid C.
Nuysink, Jacqueline
Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_full Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_fullStr Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_short Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_sort concurrent validity between live and home video observations using the alberta infant motor scale
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000363
work_keys_str_mv AT boonzaaijermarike concurrentvaliditybetweenliveandhomevideoobservationsusingthealbertainfantmotorscale
AT vandamellen concurrentvaliditybetweenliveandhomevideoobservationsusingthealbertainfantmotorscale
AT vanhaastertingridc concurrentvaliditybetweenliveandhomevideoobservationsusingthealbertainfantmotorscale
AT nuysinkjacqueline concurrentvaliditybetweenliveandhomevideoobservationsusingthealbertainfantmotorscale

Ejemplares similares