Cargando…

A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome

Shifts in healthy human microbial communities have now been linked to disease in numerous body sites. Noninvasive swabbing remains the sampling technique of choice in most locations; however, it is not well known if this method samples the entire community, or only those members that are easily remo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanshew, Alissa S., Jetté, Marie E., Tadayon, Stephanie, Thibeault, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174765
_version_ 1782518986938777600
author Hanshew, Alissa S.
Jetté, Marie E.
Tadayon, Stephanie
Thibeault, Susan L.
author_facet Hanshew, Alissa S.
Jetté, Marie E.
Tadayon, Stephanie
Thibeault, Susan L.
author_sort Hanshew, Alissa S.
collection PubMed
description Shifts in healthy human microbial communities have now been linked to disease in numerous body sites. Noninvasive swabbing remains the sampling technique of choice in most locations; however, it is not well known if this method samples the entire community, or only those members that are easily removed from the surface. We sought to compare the communities found via swabbing and biopsied tissue in true vocal folds, a location that is difficult to sample without causing potential damage and impairment to tissue function. A secondary aim of this study was to determine if swab sampling of the false vocal folds could be used as proxy for true vocal folds. True and false vocal fold mucosal samples (swabbed and biopsied) were collected from six pigs and used for 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Most of the alpha and beta measures of diversity were found to be significantly similar between swabbed and biopsied tissue samples. Similarly, the communities found in true and false vocal folds did not differ considerably. These results suggest that samples taken via swabs are sufficient to assess the community, and that samples taken from the false vocal folds may be used as proxies for the true vocal folds. Assessment of these techniques opens an avenue to less traumatic means to explore the role microbes play in the development of diseases of the vocal folds, and perhaps the rest of the respiratory tract.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5375147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53751472017-04-07 A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome Hanshew, Alissa S. Jetté, Marie E. Tadayon, Stephanie Thibeault, Susan L. PLoS One Research Article Shifts in healthy human microbial communities have now been linked to disease in numerous body sites. Noninvasive swabbing remains the sampling technique of choice in most locations; however, it is not well known if this method samples the entire community, or only those members that are easily removed from the surface. We sought to compare the communities found via swabbing and biopsied tissue in true vocal folds, a location that is difficult to sample without causing potential damage and impairment to tissue function. A secondary aim of this study was to determine if swab sampling of the false vocal folds could be used as proxy for true vocal folds. True and false vocal fold mucosal samples (swabbed and biopsied) were collected from six pigs and used for 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Most of the alpha and beta measures of diversity were found to be significantly similar between swabbed and biopsied tissue samples. Similarly, the communities found in true and false vocal folds did not differ considerably. These results suggest that samples taken via swabs are sufficient to assess the community, and that samples taken from the false vocal folds may be used as proxies for the true vocal folds. Assessment of these techniques opens an avenue to less traumatic means to explore the role microbes play in the development of diseases of the vocal folds, and perhaps the rest of the respiratory tract. Public Library of Science 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5375147/ /pubmed/28362810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174765 Text en © 2017 Hanshew et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanshew, Alissa S.
Jetté, Marie E.
Tadayon, Stephanie
Thibeault, Susan L.
A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title_full A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title_fullStr A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title_short A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
title_sort comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174765
work_keys_str_mv AT hanshewalissas acomparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT jettemariee acomparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT tadayonstephanie acomparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT thibeaultsusanl acomparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT hanshewalissas comparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT jettemariee comparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT tadayonstephanie comparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome
AT thibeaultsusanl comparisonofsamplingmethodsforexaminingthelaryngealmicrobiome