Cargando…

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management

Introduction Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palma Diaz, Marite, Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos, Vega Alarcón, Alfredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599785
_version_ 1782519038688100352
author Palma Diaz, Marite
Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos
Vega Alarcón, Alfredo
author_facet Palma Diaz, Marite
Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos
Vega Alarcón, Alfredo
author_sort Palma Diaz, Marite
collection PubMed
description Introduction Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony, hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus and hearing loss. When symptoms are mild, they are usually managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be needed for patients with debilitating symptoms. Objective The aim of this manuscript is to review the different surgical techniques used to repair the superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Data Sources PubMed and Ovid-SP databases. Data Synthesis The different approaches are described and discussed, as well as their limitations. We also review the advantages and disadvantages of the plugging, capping and resurfacing techniques to repair the dehiscence. Conclusions Each of the surgical approaches has advantages and disadvantages. The middle fossa approach gives a better view of the dehiscence, but comes with a higher morbidity than the transmastoid approach. Endoscopic assistance may be advantageous during the middle cranial fossa approach for better visualization. The plugging and capping techniques are associated with higher success rates than resurfacing, with no added risk of hearing loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5375705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53757052017-04-05 Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management Palma Diaz, Marite Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos Vega Alarcón, Alfredo Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony, hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus and hearing loss. When symptoms are mild, they are usually managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be needed for patients with debilitating symptoms. Objective The aim of this manuscript is to review the different surgical techniques used to repair the superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Data Sources PubMed and Ovid-SP databases. Data Synthesis The different approaches are described and discussed, as well as their limitations. We also review the advantages and disadvantages of the plugging, capping and resurfacing techniques to repair the dehiscence. Conclusions Each of the surgical approaches has advantages and disadvantages. The middle fossa approach gives a better view of the dehiscence, but comes with a higher morbidity than the transmastoid approach. Endoscopic assistance may be advantageous during the middle cranial fossa approach for better visualization. The plugging and capping techniques are associated with higher success rates than resurfacing, with no added risk of hearing loss. Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5375705/ /pubmed/28382131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599785 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Palma Diaz, Marite
Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos
Vega Alarcón, Alfredo
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title_full Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title_fullStr Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title_full_unstemmed Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title_short Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome – Diagnosis and Surgical Management
title_sort superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome – diagnosis and surgical management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599785
work_keys_str_mv AT palmadiazmarite superiorsemicircularcanaldehiscencesyndromediagnosisandsurgicalmanagement
AT cisneroslesserjuancarlos superiorsemicircularcanaldehiscencesyndromediagnosisandsurgicalmanagement
AT vegaalarconalfredo superiorsemicircularcanaldehiscencesyndromediagnosisandsurgicalmanagement