Cargando…

The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy

Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walter, James, Francis, Gloria, Matro, Rebecca, Kedika, Ramalinga, Grosso, Rachael, Keith, Scott W., Kastenberg, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694
_version_ 1782519093707931648
author Walter, James
Francis, Gloria
Matro, Rebecca
Kedika, Ramalinga
Grosso, Rachael
Keith, Scott W.
Kastenberg, David
author_facet Walter, James
Francis, Gloria
Matro, Rebecca
Kedika, Ramalinga
Grosso, Rachael
Keith, Scott W.
Kastenberg, David
author_sort Walter, James
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = – 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5375955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53759552017-04-05 The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy Walter, James Francis, Gloria Matro, Rebecca Kedika, Ramalinga Grosso, Rachael Keith, Scott W. Kastenberg, David Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = – 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5375955/ /pubmed/28382323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Walter, James
Francis, Gloria
Matro, Rebecca
Kedika, Ramalinga
Grosso, Rachael
Keith, Scott W.
Kastenberg, David
The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title_full The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title_fullStr The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title_short The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
title_sort impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694
work_keys_str_mv AT walterjames theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT francisgloria theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT matrorebecca theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT kedikaramalinga theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT grossorachael theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT keithscottw theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT kastenbergdavid theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT walterjames impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT francisgloria impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT matrorebecca impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT kedikaramalinga impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT grossorachael impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT keithscottw impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy
AT kastenbergdavid impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy