Cargando…
The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694 |
_version_ | 1782519093707931648 |
---|---|
author | Walter, James Francis, Gloria Matro, Rebecca Kedika, Ramalinga Grosso, Rachael Keith, Scott W. Kastenberg, David |
author_facet | Walter, James Francis, Gloria Matro, Rebecca Kedika, Ramalinga Grosso, Rachael Keith, Scott W. Kastenberg, David |
author_sort | Walter, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = – 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5375955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53759552017-04-05 The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy Walter, James Francis, Gloria Matro, Rebecca Kedika, Ramalinga Grosso, Rachael Keith, Scott W. Kastenberg, David Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = – 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5375955/ /pubmed/28382323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Walter, James Francis, Gloria Matro, Rebecca Kedika, Ramalinga Grosso, Rachael Keith, Scott W. Kastenberg, David The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title | The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title_full | The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title_short | The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
title_sort | impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walterjames theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT francisgloria theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT matrorebecca theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT kedikaramalinga theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT grossorachael theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT keithscottw theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT kastenbergdavid theimpactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT walterjames impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT francisgloria impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT matrorebecca impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT kedikaramalinga impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT grossorachael impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT keithscottw impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT kastenbergdavid impactofdietliberalizationonbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy |