Cargando…

Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Engagement in online programs is difficult to maintain. Gamification is the recent trend that offers to increase engagement through the inclusion of game-like features like points and badges, in non-game contexts. This review will answer the following question, ‘Are gamification strategi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looyestyn, Jemma, Kernot, Jocelyn, Boshoff, Kobie, Ryan, Jillian, Edney, Sarah, Maher, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403
_version_ 1782519103726026752
author Looyestyn, Jemma
Kernot, Jocelyn
Boshoff, Kobie
Ryan, Jillian
Edney, Sarah
Maher, Carol
author_facet Looyestyn, Jemma
Kernot, Jocelyn
Boshoff, Kobie
Ryan, Jillian
Edney, Sarah
Maher, Carol
author_sort Looyestyn, Jemma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Engagement in online programs is difficult to maintain. Gamification is the recent trend that offers to increase engagement through the inclusion of game-like features like points and badges, in non-game contexts. This review will answer the following question, ‘Are gamification strategies effective in increasing engagement in online programs?’ METHOD: Eight databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, Medline, INSPEC, ERIC, Cochrane Library, Business Source Complete and ACM Digital Library) were searched from 2010 to the 28(th) of October 2015 using a comprehensive search strategy. Eligibility criteria was based on the PICOS format, where “population” included adults, “intervention” involved an online program or smart phone application that included at least one gamification feature. “Comparator” was a control group, “outcomes” included engagement and “downstream” outcomes which occurred as a result of engagement; and “study design” included experimental studies from peer-reviewed sources. Effect sizes (Cohens d and 95% confidence intervals) were also calculated. RESULTS: 1017 studies were identified from database searches following the removal of duplicates, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The studies involved a total of 10,499 participants, and were commonly undertaken in tertiary education contexts. Engagement metrics included time spent (n = 5), volume of contributions (n = 11) and occasions visited to the software (n = 4); as well as downstream behaviours such as performance (n = 4) and healthy behaviours (n = 1). Effect sizes typically ranged from medium to large in direct engagement and downstream behaviours, with 12 out of 15 studies finding positive significant effects in favour of gamification. CONCLUSION: Gamification is effective in increasing engagement in online programs. Key recommendations for future research into gamification are provided. In particular, rigorous study designs are required to fully examine gamification’s effects and determine how to best achieve sustained engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5376078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53760782017-04-07 Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review Looyestyn, Jemma Kernot, Jocelyn Boshoff, Kobie Ryan, Jillian Edney, Sarah Maher, Carol PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Engagement in online programs is difficult to maintain. Gamification is the recent trend that offers to increase engagement through the inclusion of game-like features like points and badges, in non-game contexts. This review will answer the following question, ‘Are gamification strategies effective in increasing engagement in online programs?’ METHOD: Eight databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, Medline, INSPEC, ERIC, Cochrane Library, Business Source Complete and ACM Digital Library) were searched from 2010 to the 28(th) of October 2015 using a comprehensive search strategy. Eligibility criteria was based on the PICOS format, where “population” included adults, “intervention” involved an online program or smart phone application that included at least one gamification feature. “Comparator” was a control group, “outcomes” included engagement and “downstream” outcomes which occurred as a result of engagement; and “study design” included experimental studies from peer-reviewed sources. Effect sizes (Cohens d and 95% confidence intervals) were also calculated. RESULTS: 1017 studies were identified from database searches following the removal of duplicates, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The studies involved a total of 10,499 participants, and were commonly undertaken in tertiary education contexts. Engagement metrics included time spent (n = 5), volume of contributions (n = 11) and occasions visited to the software (n = 4); as well as downstream behaviours such as performance (n = 4) and healthy behaviours (n = 1). Effect sizes typically ranged from medium to large in direct engagement and downstream behaviours, with 12 out of 15 studies finding positive significant effects in favour of gamification. CONCLUSION: Gamification is effective in increasing engagement in online programs. Key recommendations for future research into gamification are provided. In particular, rigorous study designs are required to fully examine gamification’s effects and determine how to best achieve sustained engagement. Public Library of Science 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5376078/ /pubmed/28362821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403 Text en © 2017 Looyestyn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Looyestyn, Jemma
Kernot, Jocelyn
Boshoff, Kobie
Ryan, Jillian
Edney, Sarah
Maher, Carol
Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title_full Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title_fullStr Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title_short Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review
title_sort does gamification increase engagement with online programs? a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403
work_keys_str_mv AT looyestynjemma doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview
AT kernotjocelyn doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview
AT boshoffkobie doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview
AT ryanjillian doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview
AT edneysarah doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview
AT mahercarol doesgamificationincreaseengagementwithonlineprogramsasystematicreview