Cargando…

Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the push-out bond strength of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite to intracanal dentin in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 39 primary anterior teeth, which were randomly divided into th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosharrafian, Shahram, Sharifi, Zeynab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392818
_version_ 1782519174745030656
author Mosharrafian, Shahram
Sharifi, Zeynab
author_facet Mosharrafian, Shahram
Sharifi, Zeynab
author_sort Mosharrafian, Shahram
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the push-out bond strength of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite to intracanal dentin in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 39 primary anterior teeth, which were randomly divided into three groups. After cleaning and shaping, the root canals were filled with Metapex in such a way that after the application of 1mm light-cure liner on top of it, the coronal 3mm of the canal remained empty for composite post space. Z250 conventional composite was used in group 1 and SonicFill and Filtek bulk-fill composites along with Single Bond 2 were used in groups 2 and 3, respectively. The samples were subjected to thermocycling. One-millimeter thick sections were made of the mid-root and subjected to push-out bond strength test. Mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation) push-out bond strength was 11.40±4.23MPa, 10.94±6.69MPa and 8.79±4.12MPa in the conventional, SonicFill and Filtek groups, respectively. The difference in this regard among the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.397). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, bulk-fill composites, similar to conventional types, can be successfully used for the fabrication of composite intracanal posts in primary teeth to decrease the treatment time in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5376548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53765482017-04-07 Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth Mosharrafian, Shahram Sharifi, Zeynab J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the push-out bond strength of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite to intracanal dentin in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 39 primary anterior teeth, which were randomly divided into three groups. After cleaning and shaping, the root canals were filled with Metapex in such a way that after the application of 1mm light-cure liner on top of it, the coronal 3mm of the canal remained empty for composite post space. Z250 conventional composite was used in group 1 and SonicFill and Filtek bulk-fill composites along with Single Bond 2 were used in groups 2 and 3, respectively. The samples were subjected to thermocycling. One-millimeter thick sections were made of the mid-root and subjected to push-out bond strength test. Mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation) push-out bond strength was 11.40±4.23MPa, 10.94±6.69MPa and 8.79±4.12MPa in the conventional, SonicFill and Filtek groups, respectively. The difference in this regard among the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.397). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, bulk-fill composites, similar to conventional types, can be successfully used for the fabrication of composite intracanal posts in primary teeth to decrease the treatment time in children. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5376548/ /pubmed/28392818 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mosharrafian, Shahram
Sharifi, Zeynab
Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title_full Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title_fullStr Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title_short Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Bulk-Fill and One Conventional Composite to Intracanal Dentin in Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth
title_sort comparison of push-out bond strength of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite to intracanal dentin in severely damaged primary anterior teeth
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392818
work_keys_str_mv AT mosharrafianshahram comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoftwobulkfillandoneconventionalcompositetointracanaldentininseverelydamagedprimaryanteriorteeth
AT sharifizeynab comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoftwobulkfillandoneconventionalcompositetointracanaldentininseverelydamagedprimaryanteriorteeth