Cargando…

Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning

Due to the potential of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) for enhancement of fine sequenced movements and increasing interest in achieving high level of fine movements in the trained and untrained hands especially at initial stage of learning, we designed this study to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemirad, Fahimeh, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Zoghi, Maryam, Jaberzadeh, Shapour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00153
_version_ 1782519175385710592
author Hashemirad, Fahimeh
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Zoghi, Maryam
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
author_facet Hashemirad, Fahimeh
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Zoghi, Maryam
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
author_sort Hashemirad, Fahimeh
collection PubMed
description Due to the potential of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) for enhancement of fine sequenced movements and increasing interest in achieving high level of fine movements in the trained and untrained hands especially at initial stage of learning, we designed this study to investigate whether the application of single-session a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over FPN sites, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), primary motor cortex (M1) or posterior parietal cortex (PPC) could enhance sequence learning with the trained hand and these effects are transferred into the untrained hand or not. A total of 51 right-handed healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of the four stimulation groups: a-tDCS of left M1, DLPFC, PPC, or sham. Stimulation was applied for 20 min during a sequential visual isometric pinch task (SVIPT). Eight blocks of training using SVIPT were completed with the right hand during stimulation. Two blocks of sequence training with each hand were performed by participants as assessment blocks at three time points: baseline, 15 min and one day following the intervention. Behavioral outcomes including movement time, error rate and skill were assessed in all assessment blocks across three time points. We also measured corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation using single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. The results indicated that the behavioral outcomes were significantly improved with the right trained hand, but this learning effect was not modulated by a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over the FPN. Transfer of learning into the untrained hand was observed in all four groups for movement time but not for the error rate or skill. Our results suggest that sequential learning in SVIPT and its transfer into the untrained hand were not sensitive to a single-session a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over left M1, DLPFC or PPC in young healthy participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5376552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53765522017-04-18 Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning Hashemirad, Fahimeh Fitzgerald, Paul B. Zoghi, Maryam Jaberzadeh, Shapour Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Due to the potential of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) for enhancement of fine sequenced movements and increasing interest in achieving high level of fine movements in the trained and untrained hands especially at initial stage of learning, we designed this study to investigate whether the application of single-session a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over FPN sites, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), primary motor cortex (M1) or posterior parietal cortex (PPC) could enhance sequence learning with the trained hand and these effects are transferred into the untrained hand or not. A total of 51 right-handed healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of the four stimulation groups: a-tDCS of left M1, DLPFC, PPC, or sham. Stimulation was applied for 20 min during a sequential visual isometric pinch task (SVIPT). Eight blocks of training using SVIPT were completed with the right hand during stimulation. Two blocks of sequence training with each hand were performed by participants as assessment blocks at three time points: baseline, 15 min and one day following the intervention. Behavioral outcomes including movement time, error rate and skill were assessed in all assessment blocks across three time points. We also measured corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation using single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. The results indicated that the behavioral outcomes were significantly improved with the right trained hand, but this learning effect was not modulated by a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over the FPN. Transfer of learning into the untrained hand was observed in all four groups for movement time but not for the error rate or skill. Our results suggest that sequential learning in SVIPT and its transfer into the untrained hand were not sensitive to a single-session a-tDCS with small-size stimulating electrodes over left M1, DLPFC or PPC in young healthy participants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5376552/ /pubmed/28420970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00153 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hashemirad, Fitzgerald, Zoghi and Jaberzadeh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hashemirad, Fahimeh
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Zoghi, Maryam
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title_full Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title_fullStr Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title_full_unstemmed Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title_short Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
title_sort single-session anodal tdcs with small-size stimulating electrodes over frontoparietal superficial sites does not affect motor sequence learning
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00153
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemiradfahimeh singlesessionanodaltdcswithsmallsizestimulatingelectrodesoverfrontoparietalsuperficialsitesdoesnotaffectmotorsequencelearning
AT fitzgeraldpaulb singlesessionanodaltdcswithsmallsizestimulatingelectrodesoverfrontoparietalsuperficialsitesdoesnotaffectmotorsequencelearning
AT zoghimaryam singlesessionanodaltdcswithsmallsizestimulatingelectrodesoverfrontoparietalsuperficialsitesdoesnotaffectmotorsequencelearning
AT jaberzadehshapour singlesessionanodaltdcswithsmallsizestimulatingelectrodesoverfrontoparietalsuperficialsitesdoesnotaffectmotorsequencelearning