Cargando…

Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing

C-mechanoreceptors in humans comprise a population of unmyelinated afferents exhibiting a wide range of mechanical sensitivities. C-mechanoreceptors are putatively divided into those signaling gentle touch (C-tactile afferents, CTs) and nociception (C-mechanosensitive nociceptors, CMs), giving rise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watkins, Roger H., Wessberg, Johan, Backlund Wasling, Helena, Dunham, James P., Olausson, Håkan, Johnson, Richard D., Ackerley, Rochelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00939.2016
_version_ 1782519185792827392
author Watkins, Roger H.
Wessberg, Johan
Backlund Wasling, Helena
Dunham, James P.
Olausson, Håkan
Johnson, Richard D.
Ackerley, Rochelle
author_facet Watkins, Roger H.
Wessberg, Johan
Backlund Wasling, Helena
Dunham, James P.
Olausson, Håkan
Johnson, Richard D.
Ackerley, Rochelle
author_sort Watkins, Roger H.
collection PubMed
description C-mechanoreceptors in humans comprise a population of unmyelinated afferents exhibiting a wide range of mechanical sensitivities. C-mechanoreceptors are putatively divided into those signaling gentle touch (C-tactile afferents, CTs) and nociception (C-mechanosensitive nociceptors, CMs), giving rise to positive and negative affect, respectively. We sought to distinguish, compare, and contrast the properties of a population of human C-mechanoreceptors to see how fundamental the divisions between these putative subpopulations are. We used microneurography to record from individual afferents in humans and applied electrical and mechanical stimulation to their receptive fields. We show that C-mechanoreceptors can be distinguished unequivocally into two putative populations, comprising CTs and CMs, by electrically evoked spike latency changes (slowing). After both natural mechanical stimulation and repetitive electrical stimulation there was markedly less latency slowing in CTs compared with CMs. Electrical receptive field stimulation, which bypasses the receptor end organ, was most effective in classifying C-mechanoreceptors, as responses to mechanical receptive field stimulation overlapped somewhat, which may lead to misclassification. Furthermore, we report a subclass of low-threshold CM responding to gentle mechanical stimulation and a potential subclass of CT afferent displaying burst firing. We show that substantial differences exist in the mechanisms governing axonal conduction between CTs and CMs. We provide clear electrophysiological “signatures” (extent of latency slowing) that can be used in unequivocally identifying populations of C-mechanoreceptors in single-unit and multiunit microneurography studies and in translational animal research into affective touch. Additionally, these differential mechanisms may be pharmacologically targetable for separate modulation of positive and negative affective touch information. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Human skin encodes a plethora of touch interactions, and affective tactile information is primarily signaled by slowly conducting C-mechanoreceptive afferents. We show that electrical stimulation of low-threshold C-tactile afferents produces markedly different patterns of activity compared with high-threshold C-mechanoreceptive nociceptors, although the populations overlap in their responses to mechanical stimulation. This fundamental distinction demonstrates a divergence in affective touch signaling from the first stage of sensory processing, having implications for the processing of interpersonal touch.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5376601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53766012017-08-16 Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing Watkins, Roger H. Wessberg, Johan Backlund Wasling, Helena Dunham, James P. Olausson, Håkan Johnson, Richard D. Ackerley, Rochelle J Neurophysiol Rapid Report C-mechanoreceptors in humans comprise a population of unmyelinated afferents exhibiting a wide range of mechanical sensitivities. C-mechanoreceptors are putatively divided into those signaling gentle touch (C-tactile afferents, CTs) and nociception (C-mechanosensitive nociceptors, CMs), giving rise to positive and negative affect, respectively. We sought to distinguish, compare, and contrast the properties of a population of human C-mechanoreceptors to see how fundamental the divisions between these putative subpopulations are. We used microneurography to record from individual afferents in humans and applied electrical and mechanical stimulation to their receptive fields. We show that C-mechanoreceptors can be distinguished unequivocally into two putative populations, comprising CTs and CMs, by electrically evoked spike latency changes (slowing). After both natural mechanical stimulation and repetitive electrical stimulation there was markedly less latency slowing in CTs compared with CMs. Electrical receptive field stimulation, which bypasses the receptor end organ, was most effective in classifying C-mechanoreceptors, as responses to mechanical receptive field stimulation overlapped somewhat, which may lead to misclassification. Furthermore, we report a subclass of low-threshold CM responding to gentle mechanical stimulation and a potential subclass of CT afferent displaying burst firing. We show that substantial differences exist in the mechanisms governing axonal conduction between CTs and CMs. We provide clear electrophysiological “signatures” (extent of latency slowing) that can be used in unequivocally identifying populations of C-mechanoreceptors in single-unit and multiunit microneurography studies and in translational animal research into affective touch. Additionally, these differential mechanisms may be pharmacologically targetable for separate modulation of positive and negative affective touch information. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Human skin encodes a plethora of touch interactions, and affective tactile information is primarily signaled by slowly conducting C-mechanoreceptive afferents. We show that electrical stimulation of low-threshold C-tactile afferents produces markedly different patterns of activity compared with high-threshold C-mechanoreceptive nociceptors, although the populations overlap in their responses to mechanical stimulation. This fundamental distinction demonstrates a divergence in affective touch signaling from the first stage of sensory processing, having implications for the processing of interpersonal touch. American Physiological Society 2017-04-01 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5376601/ /pubmed/28123010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00939.2016 Text en Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Rapid Report
Watkins, Roger H.
Wessberg, Johan
Backlund Wasling, Helena
Dunham, James P.
Olausson, Håkan
Johnson, Richard D.
Ackerley, Rochelle
Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title_full Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title_fullStr Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title_full_unstemmed Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title_short Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
title_sort optimal delineation of single c-tactile and c-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing
topic Rapid Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00939.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT watkinsrogerh optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT wessbergjohan optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT backlundwaslinghelena optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT dunhamjamesp optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT olaussonhakan optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT johnsonrichardd optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing
AT ackerleyrochelle optimaldelineationofsinglectactileandcnociceptiveafferentsinhumansbylatencyslowing