Cargando…

Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump

Common methods to estimate vertical jump height (VJH) are based on the measurements of flight time (FT) or vertical reaction force. This study aimed to assess the measurement errors when estimating the VJH with flight time using photocell devices in comparison with the gold standard jump height meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attia, A, Dhahbi, W, Chaouachi, A, Padulo, J, Wong, DP, Chamari, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5377563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28416900
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2017.63735
_version_ 1782519335219101696
author Attia, A
Dhahbi, W
Chaouachi, A
Padulo, J
Wong, DP
Chamari, K
author_facet Attia, A
Dhahbi, W
Chaouachi, A
Padulo, J
Wong, DP
Chamari, K
author_sort Attia, A
collection PubMed
description Common methods to estimate vertical jump height (VJH) are based on the measurements of flight time (FT) or vertical reaction force. This study aimed to assess the measurement errors when estimating the VJH with flight time using photocell devices in comparison with the gold standard jump height measured by a force plate (FP). The second purpose was to determine the intrinsic reliability of the Optojump photoelectric cells in estimating VJH. For this aim, 20 subjects (age: 22.50±1.24 years) performed maximal vertical jumps in three modalities in randomized order: the squat jump (SJ), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and CMJ with arm swing (CMJarm). Each trial was simultaneously recorded by the FP and Optojump devices. High intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for validity (0.98-0.99) and low limits of agreement (less than 1.4 cm) were found; even a systematic difference in jump height was consistently observed between FT and double integration of force methods (-31% to -27%; p<0.001) and a large effect size (Cohen’s d>1.2). Intra-session reliability of Optojump was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, low coefficients of variation (3.98%), and low standard errors of measurement (0.8 cm). It was concluded that there was a high correlation between the two methods to estimate the vertical jump height, but the FT method cannot replace the gold standard, due to the large systematic bias. According to our results, the equations of each of the three jump modalities were presented in order to obtain a better estimation of the jump height.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5377563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53775632017-04-17 Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump Attia, A Dhahbi, W Chaouachi, A Padulo, J Wong, DP Chamari, K Biol Sport Original Paper Common methods to estimate vertical jump height (VJH) are based on the measurements of flight time (FT) or vertical reaction force. This study aimed to assess the measurement errors when estimating the VJH with flight time using photocell devices in comparison with the gold standard jump height measured by a force plate (FP). The second purpose was to determine the intrinsic reliability of the Optojump photoelectric cells in estimating VJH. For this aim, 20 subjects (age: 22.50±1.24 years) performed maximal vertical jumps in three modalities in randomized order: the squat jump (SJ), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and CMJ with arm swing (CMJarm). Each trial was simultaneously recorded by the FP and Optojump devices. High intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for validity (0.98-0.99) and low limits of agreement (less than 1.4 cm) were found; even a systematic difference in jump height was consistently observed between FT and double integration of force methods (-31% to -27%; p<0.001) and a large effect size (Cohen’s d>1.2). Intra-session reliability of Optojump was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, low coefficients of variation (3.98%), and low standard errors of measurement (0.8 cm). It was concluded that there was a high correlation between the two methods to estimate the vertical jump height, but the FT method cannot replace the gold standard, due to the large systematic bias. According to our results, the equations of each of the three jump modalities were presented in order to obtain a better estimation of the jump height. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2016-12-01 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5377563/ /pubmed/28416900 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2017.63735 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Attia, A
Dhahbi, W
Chaouachi, A
Padulo, J
Wong, DP
Chamari, K
Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title_full Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title_fullStr Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title_full_unstemmed Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title_short Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump
title_sort measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of optojump
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5377563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28416900
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2017.63735
work_keys_str_mv AT attiaa measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump
AT dhahbiw measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump
AT chaouachia measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump
AT paduloj measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump
AT wongdp measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump
AT chamarik measurementerrorswhenestimatingtheverticaljumpheightwithflighttimeusingphotocelldevicestheexampleofoptojump