Cargando…

A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK

Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadson, Simon J., Hall, Jim W., Murgatroyd, Anna, Acreman, Mike, Bates, Paul, Beven, Keith, Heathwaite, Louise, Holden, Joseph, Holman, Ian P., Lane, Stuart N., O'Connell, Enda, Penning-Rowsell, Edmund, Reynard, Nick, Sear, David, Thorne, Colin, Wilby, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
_version_ 1782519411141246976
author Dadson, Simon J.
Hall, Jim W.
Murgatroyd, Anna
Acreman, Mike
Bates, Paul
Beven, Keith
Heathwaite, Louise
Holden, Joseph
Holman, Ian P.
Lane, Stuart N.
O'Connell, Enda
Penning-Rowsell, Edmund
Reynard, Nick
Sear, David
Thorne, Colin
Wilby, Rob
author_facet Dadson, Simon J.
Hall, Jim W.
Murgatroyd, Anna
Acreman, Mike
Bates, Paul
Beven, Keith
Heathwaite, Louise
Holden, Joseph
Holman, Ian P.
Lane, Stuart N.
O'Connell, Enda
Penning-Rowsell, Edmund
Reynard, Nick
Sear, David
Thorne, Colin
Wilby, Rob
author_sort Dadson, Simon J.
collection PubMed
description Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5378234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53782342017-04-14 A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK Dadson, Simon J. Hall, Jim W. Murgatroyd, Anna Acreman, Mike Bates, Paul Beven, Keith Heathwaite, Louise Holden, Joseph Holman, Ian P. Lane, Stuart N. O'Connell, Enda Penning-Rowsell, Edmund Reynard, Nick Sear, David Thorne, Colin Wilby, Rob Proc Math Phys Eng Sci Review Article Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-03 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5378234/ /pubmed/28413336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Dadson, Simon J.
Hall, Jim W.
Murgatroyd, Anna
Acreman, Mike
Bates, Paul
Beven, Keith
Heathwaite, Louise
Holden, Joseph
Holman, Ian P.
Lane, Stuart N.
O'Connell, Enda
Penning-Rowsell, Edmund
Reynard, Nick
Sear, David
Thorne, Colin
Wilby, Rob
A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title_full A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title_fullStr A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title_full_unstemmed A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title_short A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK
title_sort restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the uk
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
work_keys_str_mv AT dadsonsimonj arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT halljimw arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT murgatroydanna arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT acremanmike arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT batespaul arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT bevenkeith arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT heathwaitelouise arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT holdenjoseph arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT holmanianp arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT lanestuartn arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT oconnellenda arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT penningrowselledmund arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT reynardnick arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT seardavid arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT thornecolin arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT wilbyrob arestatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT dadsonsimonj restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT halljimw restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT murgatroydanna restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT acremanmike restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT batespaul restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT bevenkeith restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT heathwaitelouise restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT holdenjoseph restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT holmanianp restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT lanestuartn restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT oconnellenda restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT penningrowselledmund restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT reynardnick restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT seardavid restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT thornecolin restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk
AT wilbyrob restatementofthenaturalscienceevidenceconcerningcatchmentbasednaturalfloodmanagementintheuk