Cargando…

Type 1 diabetes: Developing the first risk-estimation model for predicting silent myocardial ischemia. The potential role of insulin resistance

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to develop a novel risk estimation model for predicting silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and no clinical cardiovascular disease, evaluating the potential role of insulin resistance in such a model. Additionally, the accurac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llauradó, Gemma, Cano, Albert, Hernández, Cristina, González-Sastre, Montserrat, Rodríguez, Ato-Antonio, Puntí, Jordi, Berlanga, Eugenio, Albert, Lara, Simó, Rafael, Vendrell, Joan, González Clemente, José-Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174640
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to develop a novel risk estimation model for predicting silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and no clinical cardiovascular disease, evaluating the potential role of insulin resistance in such a model. Additionally, the accuracy of this model was compared with currently available models for predicting clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) in general and diabetic populations. RESEARCH, DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with T1DM (35–65years, >10-year duration) and no clinical cardiovascular disease were consecutively evaluated for: 1) clinical and anthropometric data (including classical cardiovascular risk factors), 2) insulin sensitivity (estimate of glucose disposal rate (eGDR)), and 3) SMI diagnosed by stress myocardial perfusion gated SPECTs. RESULTS: Eighty-four T1DM patients were evaluated [50.1±9.3 years, 50% men, 36.9% active smokers, T1DM duration: 19.0(15.9–27.5) years and eGDR 7.8(5.5–9.4)mg·kg(-1)·min(-1)]. Of these, ten were diagnosed with SMI (11.9%). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that only eGDR (OR = -0.593, p = 0.005) and active smoking (OR = 7.964, p = 0.018) were independently associated with SMI. The AUC of the ROC curve of this risk estimation model for predicting SMI was 0.833 (95%CI:0.692–0.974), higher than those obtained with the use of currently available models for predicting clinical CAD (Framingham Risk Equation: 0.833 vs. 0.688, p = 0.122; UKPDS Risk Engine (0.833 vs. 0.559; p = 0.001) and EDC equation: 0.833 vs. 0.558, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first ever reported risk-estimation model for predicting SMI in T1DM. The model only includes insulin resistance and active smoking as main predictors of SMI.