Cargando…
The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
BACKGROUND: Despite a liberal abortion law, access to safe abortion services in South Africa is challenging for many women. Medication abortion was introduced in 2013, but its reach remains limited. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester medication abortio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174615 |
_version_ | 1782519426200895488 |
---|---|
author | Lince-Deroche, Naomi Fetters, Tamara Sinanovic, Edina Devjee, Jaymala Moodley, Jack Blanchard, Kelly |
author_facet | Lince-Deroche, Naomi Fetters, Tamara Sinanovic, Edina Devjee, Jaymala Moodley, Jack Blanchard, Kelly |
author_sort | Lince-Deroche, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite a liberal abortion law, access to safe abortion services in South Africa is challenging for many women. Medication abortion was introduced in 2013, but its reach remains limited. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester medication abortion and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) services to inform planning for first-trimester service provision in South Africa and similar settings. METHODS: We obtained data on service provision and outcomes from an operations research study where medication abortion was introduced alongside existing MVA services in public hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal province. Clinical data were collected through interviews with first-trimester abortion clients and summaries completed by nurses performing the procedures. In parallel, we performed micro-costing at three of the study hospitals. Using a model built in Excel, we estimated the average cost per medical and surgical procedure and determined the cost per complete abortion performed. Results are presented in 2015 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 1,129 women were eligible for a first trimester abortion at the three study sites. The majority (886, 78.5%) were eligible to choose their abortion procedure; 94.1% (n = 834) chose medication abortion. The total average cost per medication abortion was $63.91 (52.32–75.51). The total average cost per MVA was higher at $69.60 (52.62–86.57); though the cost ranges for the two procedures overlapped. Given average costs, the cost per complete medication abortion was lower than the cost per complete MVA despite three (0.4%) medication abortion women being hospitalized and two (0.3%) having ongoing pregnancies at study exit. Personnel costs were the largest component of the total average cost of both abortion methods. CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the scale-up of medication abortion alongside existing MVA services in South Africa. Women can be offered a choice of methods, including medication abortion with MVA as a back-up, without increasing costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5378341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53783412017-04-07 The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa Lince-Deroche, Naomi Fetters, Tamara Sinanovic, Edina Devjee, Jaymala Moodley, Jack Blanchard, Kelly PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite a liberal abortion law, access to safe abortion services in South Africa is challenging for many women. Medication abortion was introduced in 2013, but its reach remains limited. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester medication abortion and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) services to inform planning for first-trimester service provision in South Africa and similar settings. METHODS: We obtained data on service provision and outcomes from an operations research study where medication abortion was introduced alongside existing MVA services in public hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal province. Clinical data were collected through interviews with first-trimester abortion clients and summaries completed by nurses performing the procedures. In parallel, we performed micro-costing at three of the study hospitals. Using a model built in Excel, we estimated the average cost per medical and surgical procedure and determined the cost per complete abortion performed. Results are presented in 2015 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 1,129 women were eligible for a first trimester abortion at the three study sites. The majority (886, 78.5%) were eligible to choose their abortion procedure; 94.1% (n = 834) chose medication abortion. The total average cost per medication abortion was $63.91 (52.32–75.51). The total average cost per MVA was higher at $69.60 (52.62–86.57); though the cost ranges for the two procedures overlapped. Given average costs, the cost per complete medication abortion was lower than the cost per complete MVA despite three (0.4%) medication abortion women being hospitalized and two (0.3%) having ongoing pregnancies at study exit. Personnel costs were the largest component of the total average cost of both abortion methods. CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the scale-up of medication abortion alongside existing MVA services in South Africa. Women can be offered a choice of methods, including medication abortion with MVA as a back-up, without increasing costs. Public Library of Science 2017-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5378341/ /pubmed/28369061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174615 Text en © 2017 Lince-Deroche et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lince-Deroche, Naomi Fetters, Tamara Sinanovic, Edina Devjee, Jaymala Moodley, Jack Blanchard, Kelly The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title | The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title_full | The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title_fullStr | The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title_short | The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa |
title_sort | costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in kwazulu-natal province, south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lincederochenaomi thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT fetterstamara thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT sinanovicedina thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT devjeejaymala thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT moodleyjack thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT blanchardkelly thecostsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT lincederochenaomi costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT fetterstamara costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT sinanovicedina costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT devjeejaymala costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT moodleyjack costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica AT blanchardkelly costsandcosteffectivenessofprovidingfirsttrimestermedicalandsurgicalsafeabortionservicesinkwazulunatalprovincesouthafrica |